Blanshard claims that “if you place the nature of truth in one sort of character and its test in something quite different, you are pretty certain, sooner or later, to find the two falling apart.”...

Blanshard claims that “if you place the nature of truth in one sort of character and its test in something quite different, you are pretty certain, sooner or later, to find the two falling apart.” What does he mean by this? Why is this claim important to his attempt to show that the “nature of truth” is correspondence with our accepted beliefs?