Before beginning this assignment review the guidance on "Writing an Article Review" Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is for you to show your understanding ofpeer-reviewed empirical...

1 answer below »

Before beginning this assignment review the guidance on "Writing an Article Review"


Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is for you to show your understanding ofpeer-reviewed empirical articlesthrough: 1) reviewing original research; 2) evaluating claims, methods, and conclusions; and 3) communicating your analysis in a way that translates scientific information into common terms for a general audience. In writing an article review, you gain skills in summarizing key points and findings, interpreting results, evaluating the validity of the methods used and results reported, and communicating information to an audience in ways they understand.



Step 1: Read the tips from the UMGC library on “Finding Experimental (Empirical) Research Articles.” Pay special attention to the sections on “Scholarly Research Articles” the “Structure of An Experimental Article”


Step 2: Using theUMGC Libraryelectronic databases, find an article published in the last seven (7) years in an APA journal with a focus on Personality (e.g., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology or Personality and Personality Disorders). The article should describe, specifically, an experiment or empirical study by the researchers. This means that the researchers conducted a study that contains easily identifiable independent and dependent variables. (Do not select meta-analyses, summaries, editorials, or theoretical articles. It is your responsibility to make sure that the journal article you select is appropriate. If you are unsure about the relevance of your article, contact your instructor for approval.).


Step 3: Read the article starting with the Title and Abstract, which will give you a quick preview of the purpose and results of the article.


Step 4: Read the Introduction. Highlight the purpose of the article and the author’s hypothesis (e.g., what was studied, what the authors predicted, and why they found the topic worthy of study). Pay attention to the context provided for the research (i.e., what research has been done previously in the field? what issue or problem is this study trying to address?)


Step 5: Read the Methods section. Note the description of the participants and any tests, surveys, questionnaires, apparatus, or other materials that were used. Pay particular attention to the details involved in the experimental procedure. How were the variables manipulated or measured? Recall that the Independent Variable (IV) is the variable that is manipulated by the research (i.e., whether the room is hot or cold (if that is the variable of interest) or whether participants are given a placebo, shown any type of media or other stimuli, given talk therapy, or instructed to take medication (if that is the variable of interest). Remember that the Independent Variable is what was different about the experiences of the different groups. Recall also that the Dependent Variable (DV) is that variable that is measured, or, the outcome of the study (i.e., test performance or lessening of depressive symptoms).


Step 6: Read the Results. Try not to get intimidated by complex statistical analysis. Instead of focusing on the numbers, focus on the short descriptions that accompany the findings explaining what the researchers found (i.e., Did the researchers find evidence that supports their hypothesis?)


Step 7: Read the Discussion. Pay special attention here to what the authors say about the importance of their findings or the lack of findings. Think about other things you could do to look at this issue.


Step 8: Prepare a 2 to 5 page summary of the article in your own words. Be sure to address the following questions in your summary:



  • What is the purpose of the research? (Address specifics regarding the overall purpose of the research in question.)

  • What hypothesis is tested? (Provide a clear statement of the researchers’ prediction.)

  • How did the researchers investigate their research question? (Provide details regarding the study methodology.)

  • What are the pertinent results of the manipulation? (What were the findings and conclusions drawn?)

  • What is yourpersonal opinion of the study conducted? Should it be repeated? What could be improved?

  • What is your overall impression of the work? What are the implications of the study for the practice of counseling psychology?


Your summary should be written as a coherent essay (do not format as a list of answers to these questions). You may include additional insights in your analysis, but you must address these key issues.


Step 9: Prepare your Article Review according to the following guidelines:



  • Structure your paper utilizingAPA style(7th Edition); this includes title page,headings,in-text citations, reference page, and general paper format (1-inch margins, double-spaced, appropriately sizedsans serif or serif fonts- e.g., 12 Times Roman).An abstract isnotrequired.

  • Apply sound writing mechanics: write with clarity, paying attention to spelling, grammar, and syntax.

  • Submit to your Assignment Folder as a single document in either Microsoft Word, PDF, or RTF format.

Answered 3 days AfterNov 04, 2021

Answer To: Before beginning this assignment review the guidance on "Writing an Article Review" Purpose: The...

Soumi answered on Nov 08 2021
125 Votes
Running Head: ARTICLE REVIEW                                1
ARTICLE REVIEW                                         8
ARTICLE REVIEW
Table of Contents
Introduction    3
The Purpose of the Research    3
Tested Hypothesis    3
Methodology and Investigation    4
Study 1    4
Study 2    5
Results    5
Study 1    5
Study 2    5
Discussion and Recomme
ndations    6
Implications    7
Conclusion    7
References    8
Introduction
This paper is a review of an article “The State of Social and Personality Science: Rotten to the Core, Not So Bad, Getting Better, or Getting Worse”, from the “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”. In this paper, the purpose and research questions of the article are the initial points to discuss. Further it will highlight the methodology and finding of the study conducted. Based on all, I have given my personal opinion with few recommendations as a discussion. Lastly, it will be concluded with the overall impression of the work and implications for future practices.
The Purpose of the Research
The present debate's influence on social and Personality Psychology Research Procedures is uncertain; however, it has been hotly disputed in recent years. The study looks at if and how practices have altered, if at all, in the recent decade. It wraps up by examining the prevalence of “Questionable Research Practices (QRPs)” and the reproducibility of specific findings (Motyl et al., 2017).
Personality and social psychologists have turned inward and begun to doubt the veracity of the research published in the publications. This debate may be compared to a revolution in many respects, with a growing number of people aiming for a new "scientific paradise". This article investigates if there is proof that the scientific quality of personality and social psychology has shifted. The authors also look at whether the debate about testing procedures is contributing to better scientific practice.
Tested Hypothesis
There are four major viewpoints on the present status of social and personality research, which differ along two major aspects.
1. One is rotten to the core, with researchers seeing the literature as full of false positives and little potential for improvement. If this is the prevalent thinking in the field, author can expect to observe high self-reported rates of QRP engagement with primarily cynical reasoning.
2. It can get better perspective believes that the published literature contains many false positives, but is more hopeful that the research sector can improve. The development of strong ethical cultures that clearly express the spectrum of permissible and unacceptable conduct via leader role modelling, reward systems, and informal norms helps minimize unethical behavior.
3. Failure to reproduce is a feature, not a flaw. Van Bavel and colleagues assessed how contextually sensitive each of the 100...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here