Criteria |
High Distinction (85%+) |
Distinction (75-84%) |
Credit (65-74%) |
Pass (50-64%) |
Fail (0-49%) |
Identification of issue and its relevance to Australian education contexts. Awareness and appreciation of diversity in Australian society and understand how equity of access and participation affects the quality of educational provision.
/5
|
Issue statement was focused and succinct, well articulated, justified and clearly identifies the following report structure for the reader. Provides a well articulated statement that shows clarity of understanding of the equity issue and a broad and deep understanding of the issue in the Australian education context. Statement clearly articulates how the issue is relevant to either early childhood and/or primary contexts. Relevant references used to support the issue statement.
|
Issue statement was succinct and orientates the reader to the report focus.Provides a well articulated and clear explanation of the equity issue that shows understanding of the issue in the Australian education context. Statement identifies clearly how the issue is relevant to either early childhood and/or primary contexts. References used to support the issue statement. |
Equity issue was clearly explained and well thought out. The statement may be supported by some references and shows awareness of the importance of the issue in the Australian education context. Statement identifies the issue's relevance to either early childhood and/or primary contexts. Provides a clear identification of the equity issue. |
An equity issue that is appropriate in the context of the subject content and the Australian education context was identified. Some evidence of how the issue is relevant to either early childhood and/or primary contexts. The statement may lack some detail as noted by marker.
|
Equity issue was not appropriate in relation to the module topics and/or marker’s suggestions to the student’s Assessment 1 submission. Indequate demonstration of how the issue is relevant to either early childhood and/or primary contexts. Equity issue is not well identified or articulated. |
Discussion of the issue and application of relevant sociological theory. Awareness of conceptual frameworks for understanding family issues of relevance to curriculum, pedagogy and service provision.
/10
|
Accurate, detailed explanation and application of sociological theory and concepts to the equity issue. An analysis and justification of the chosen sociological theory in relation to the equity issue is presented. Response shows deep understanding of appropriate sociological theory. A selective use of the readings and modules which were well synthesised and applied analytically in the student’s own words. |
A detailed explanation and application of sociological theory and concepts to issue. Relevance of the theory to the equity issue is clearly articulated and well reasoned. Response shows a thorough understanding of an appropriate sociological theory and how it is applicable to the equity issue. |
A relevant sociological theory and application of sociological theory and concepts to the issue are explained. Relevance of the theory to the equity issue is clearly articulated. Response shows sound understanding of an appropriate sociological theory and how it is applicable to the equity issue. |
Response shows recognition of relevant sociological theory and how it is applicable to the equity issue. Response describes an appropriate sociological theory and concepts applicable to the issue. |
Response does not identify relevant sociological theory. No or limited or inappropriate application of sociological theory and concepts to the issue. |
Significance of the issue to stakeholders. Awareness and appreciation of diversity in Australian society and understand how equity of access and participation affects the quality of educational provision. Awareness of how social, political and educational policies and practices affect children and families.
/10
|
A rigorous application of the literature in discussing the issue’s significance to all stakeholders. Excellent understanding and explanation of how the issue is relevant to students, families and teaching professionals with strong links to relevant research. Depth and breadth of understanding and application of policy information and its implications is clearly evident. Understanding shows awareness of diversity in Australian society by avoiding generalisations and drawing on relevant and targeted literature. Clear, logical and well-reasoned links to a range of quality scholarly literature and research. |
Clear understanding of how the issue is significant to students, families, teaching professionals and governments with appropriate links to relevant research. A broad understanding and application of policy information and its implications is clearly evident. Understanding shows awareness of diversity in Australian society by avoiding generalisations and drawing on relevant and targeted literature. Clear and logical links made to scholarly literature.
|
Understanding of how the issue is significant to students, families, teaching professionals and governments is explained with links to relevant research. Understanding of policy information and its implications is clearly evident. Understanding shows awareness of diversity in Australian society by avoiding generalisations and drawing on relevant and targeted literature. Clear links made to scholarly literature, with a range of literature cited.
|
Some understanding of the significance of the issue to students, families, teaching professionals and governments. Some understanding of policy information and its implications is evident. Understanding shows some awareness of diversity in Australian society.Few links to literature are used, or links may be lacking in relevance.
|
No or limited identification of the the significance of the issue to stakeholders including students, families, teaching professionals and governments. Significance is poorly explained or justified. No or limited understanding of policy information and its implications is evident. |
Potential strategies to address the issue (policy and/or pedagogical) and conclusion. Understanding of social policy and service provision for children and families as they apply in the early childhood and primary educational contexts.
/10
|
A wide range of relevant and well-informed strategies for the provision of policy or service for children and families are recommended for the resolution of the issue. Strategies reflect a detailed understanding of social policy and service provision at different levels (ie individual, group, community, government). Responses demonstrate a thorough and insightful understanding of the issue and offer creative and innovative strategies for resolution. Strategies are well informed, supported by a wide range of literature (including wider reading) and links to and application of sociological theory. |
A range of relevant strategies for the provision of policy or service for children and families are recommended for the resolution of the issue. Strategies reflect understanding of social policy and service provision at different levels (ie individual, group, community, government). Responses demonstrate a thorough understanding of the issue, and offer solutions that are practical and well thought out.Strategies supported by links to literature and application of sociological theory. |
Relevant strategies for the provision of policy or service for children and families are recommended for the resolution of the issue. Strategies demonstrate sound understanding of social policy and service provision relevant to the equity issue and offer some realistic solutions to the issue. Strategies supported by links to the literature and recognition of sociological literature. |
Some strategies for the provision of policy or service for children and families are recommended for the resolution of the issue. The strategies recommended show understanding of social policy and service provision relevant to the equity issue. Response may be lacking in some detail or clarity.Strategies supported by minimal links to the literature. |
No or limited recommendation of strategies to resolve the issue. Strategies are irrelevant to the equity issue, poorly thought out or lacking in explanation.Strategies are not supported by links to literature. |
Academic literacy, use of scholarly literature, use of report format and APA referencing /5
|
Grammar, spelling and punctuation are correct and used to a very high standard. Use of literature strengthens explanation and justification of the issue. Exceeds minimum source requirements. Direct quotes are used minimally and discerningly.Excellent use of a report format, with clear, logical headings and structure throughout.Reference list is extensive, complete and correct. Correct use of APA 6th referencing with no errors. |
Grammar, spelling and punctuation are correct and used to a high standard. A range of quality literature and research is cited to support explanation of the issue.Exceeds minimum source requirements.Direct quotes are used discerningly. Very good use of a report format, with clear, logical headings and structure throughout.Reference list is complete and correct. APA 6th referencing is correct with minor errors. |
Good use of grammar, spelling and/or punctuation with only minor errors. Literature is scholarly and relevant to the issue.Exceeds minimum source requirements. Direct quotes are used discerningly.Good use of the report format, with clear headings and structure.Reference list is generally complete and correct. Generally correct use of APA 6th referencing but with some errors. |
Satisfactory use of grammar. Some spelling and/or punctuation mistakes. References and links to scholarly literature are evident. Meets minimum source requirements. Paraphrasing evident but some overuse of direct quotes.Satisfactory use of a report format, with evidence of headings and structure.Reference list is mostly correct with some errors. Some examples of weak or incredible references.APA 6th style is mostly correct. |
Poor use of grammar, spelling and/or punctuation. Inadequate links to scholarly literature and/or links to research. Overuse of direct quotes. Sources not acknowledged. Does not meet minimum source requirements.Fails to utilise a report format. Format and layout are poor. Limited use of headings and/or structure. Sections of the report are missing.Reference list is incorrectly referenced, incomplete, or cites weak or incredible references. Poor use of APA 6th referencing. Does not adhere to word limit requirements. |