Attached are instructions please assigned to expert SHEWTA. Attached is also example from prior week.
SOCIOLOGY 200 – TIDEWATER COMMUNITY COLLEGE WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT 3 WEEK 3 Please use complete sentences to answer the following questions. Each of these questions can be answered after completing the Chapter Readings (linked to the module) You may submit your answers by typing them and attaching them in a Word Doc, or by submitting through Canvas as a textbox. Chapter 6 Questions: 1. Define: primary groups, secondary groups, in-groups, out-groups, and reference groups? 2. What is the function of a primary group? What is the function of a secondary group? How has technology changed your primary groups and secondary groups? 3. The concept of hate crimes has been linked to in-groups and out-groups. Can you think of an example where people have been excluded or tormented due to this kind of group dynamic? Chapter 7 Questions 1. Since deviance is culturally defined, most of the decisions we make are dependent on the reactions of others. Is there anything the people in your life encourage you to do that you don’t? Why don’t you? 2. Think of a recent time when you used informal negative sanctions. To what act of deviance were you responding? How did your actions affect the deviant person or persons? How did your reaction help maintain social control? Please provide in text Citations and references from the reading material provided chapter 6 and chapter 7. USE THE READING THAT IS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE ASSIGMENT. Use in text citations and include reference page. Jessica Claiborne SOC 200 Spring 2023 Written Assignment 2 Chapter 3 Questions Question 1: The intangible characteristics of a civilization that are expressed via observable and touchable artefacts are referred to as the "material culture" of that society. These are items that were made by man and encompass a wide variety of institutions, such as homes, schools, churches, factories, and companies, as well as other establishments of a similar kind. The electronic gadget that is being used to read this is one example of an object that is typical of the material culture of today (such as a laptop, smartphone, or tablet). On the other side, the term "non-material culture" refers to the aspects of a culture that are not tangible and do not take up physical space. These aspects include ideas, beliefs, values, and norms [1]. Non-material culture is separate from "material culture." For instance, the concept of religion refers to a set of views that are generally believed about an all-powerful entity, worship, and ethical standards, and it is found to be practiced in a variety of groups located all over the world. Question 2: The existence of social problems is a phenomenon that will never come to an end; the root cause, which is ultimately a result of differing values and ideas. Although individuals have varying conceptions of what constitutes a social problem, those who share a similar set of values are likely to see the same situations as problematic in society. Think of a societal issue as something that affects everyone and that, in large part, has to be fixed by the belief system of an individual. This problem is often a behavior of the person that is considered to be problematic in some way [2]. It is likely that the individual wants to fight for his or her opinion, or that the individual was personally impacted by the issue. In general, individuals disregard the views and values held by others because they perceive their own to be superior for everyone. They do this in order to force their views and ideals upon other people, which in and of itself is the source of a societal issue. Question 3: The experience of "culture shock" is a natural part of the process of acclimating to a foreign culture. It is a moment when a person becoming conscious of the contrasts and/or conflicts in the values and practices of their native culture and the culture they are a part of now, which may be a different culture. Anxiety, bewilderment, homesickness, and/or rage are common emotions that people may experience [3]. The manner in which one evaluates or assesses cultures that are not one's own is the primary distinction that exists between ethnocentrism and cultural relativism. Ethnocentrism is the practice of seeing another culture through the lens of one's own culture, while cultural relativism is the practice of viewing another culture through the lens of that culture's own viewpoint rather than through the lens of one's own culture. Chapter 5 Questions: Question 1: The process of acquiring and internalizing the rules, values, and behaviors of a particular culture is referred to as socialization. Karl Marx advised as the vigor that drives human history and is at the central of human society. Individuals' familiarization well with norms of a particular social group or culture is one of the goals of the socialization process [4]. In addition to this, it teaches students how to work together with others and solve difficulties. The majority of the time, it is the parents who are the ones who make it possible for their children to interact with others who are not members of their close relatives in settings such as the children's schools, places of worship, groups, and sports leagues. Question 2: Kids do not "innately" turn into human adults; even though their bodies change, they need contact with other people to acquire the characteristics that we regard to be typical of human beings. Socialization refers to the process of learning the norms and customs of a society via participation in activities and conversations with other people. This demonstrates that it is society that makes us human. References: 1. Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons, and Charles D. Fennig (eds.). 2020. Ethnologue: Languages of the World. Twenty-Third edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version http://www.ethnologue.com 2. Weber, Bruce. 2001. “Harold Garfinkel, a Common-Sense Sociologist, Dies at 93.” The New York Times, May 3. Retrieved February 10, 2012 (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/04/US/04garfinkel.html?_r=2) 3. Swoyer, Chris. 2003. “The Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta, Winter. Retrieved May 5, 2011 (http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2003/entries/davidson/) 4. Roberts, Donald F., Ulla G. Foehr, and Victoria Rideout. 2005. “Parents, Children, and Media: A Kaiser Family Foundation Survey.” The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved February 14, 2012 (http://www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/7638.pdf).