Assume you are a policy analyst working for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife.In this policy case memo assignment, you need to identify the problem, suggest different solutions for the problem, analyze them and make a recommendation.
PA 506: Policy Analysis and Alternatives Spring 2019 University of Illinois – Chicago Department of Public Administration, CUPPA Professor Agustina Laurito Assignment 4 Due: VIA BLACKBOARD ON March 20 before class Page limit: No more than 5 pages - double spaced This is an INDIVIDUAL assignment Prompt You are a policy analyst working for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Recently, reports of poaching activity have become increasingly common. Poachers are targeting various species of California succulent plants and one rare specimen in particular (Dudleya), which they smuggle to various destinations. Your boss, Charlton H. Bonham, Director of the Department of Fish and Wildlife is concerned about this trend and has tasked you with identifying the problem (causes, who is more likely affected, what is the extent of the problem), suggesting different solutions for the problem (policy alternatives) analyzing them and making a recommendation. Director Bonham has given you a week to write this policy memo. He will present your findings to Governor Newsom and other relevant stakeholders. This case study is a starting point for you to work on this issue: Goodyear, Dana “Succulent-Smugglers Descend on California”, The New Yorker, February 21, 2019. You are expected to do additional research and to follow Bardach’s model in writing the memo. The analysis needs to be supported by evidence and your thought process for why you make a certain prediction or statement needs to be spelled out (nothing is obvious). Again, each memo should being with a memo heading and have the following sections: · Short overview: summarize the key problem and your recommendation (two or three sentences). · Problem statement (needs to be detailed and context specific) · Alternatives (need to include details and no analysis) · Criteria (connected to problem, written as active sentences) · Analysis (project the outcomes of alternatives, use evidence to justify projections, nothing is obvious. Use criteria as a guide) · Recommendation (no new analysis in the recommendation) · Include an outcome’s matrix.
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here