AssignmentSelect one company from the world’s 500 largest companies of Fortune Index(http://fortune.com/fortune500/list/) and choose a recent organisational changedecision that the company took or is considering to take (instead of the Fortune Index,a local alternative from another country could be utilised, in case this makes youranalysis easier). Examples of strategic decisions or change initiatives include mergerand acquisitions, restructuring, culture change and expansion of the organisation.Prepare an assignment of 2000 words in length in which you will:Section 1 (20%) (Approximately 400 words).Briefly introduce the organisation that you have chosen to analyse. In this section,your analysis should include, but not be limited to:o The organisation and its structure - overview of the organisation(mission, objectives, areas of operations etc.); background (when it wascreated, how it has developed so far, main achievements, etc.); trackrecord (size and performance).o The market in which the company operates - market position andpotential growth for the company.o Main products/services.o The organisational change decisionExtensive use of appendices for this section is highly advisable so that you can supportand justify your arguments in the main body of our assignment.Section 2 (40%) (Approximately 800 words) Utilising relevant theories analyse, discuss and explain how the leader of thecompany has managed to empower their subordinates regarding the recentdecision or change event. What do you believe they should have donedifferently? Where there any negative consequences?Section 3 (40%) (Approximately 800 words) Utilising one of the organisational change models, evaluate the role of Board ofDirectors or the TMT in in the implementation of the change. Your discussionin this section should include:o Governance and organisation structure; governance policies andprocedures; governing bodies and committeeso The team (history, composition, turnover, remuneration) Make an evaluation of the CEO’s leadership style using leadership theories andconcepts learned in this module. You can use data derived from speeches,communication and annual reports for this purpose. Does the CEO possess theelements/traits of a successful change leader?References- AppendixesImportant Note: the company that you will choose for this assignment can be used inyour final exam.Word count does not include appendices, tables and referencing list. The majority ofthe data should be presented in the appendices.GUIDANCE:Previous experience suggests several important differences between excellent andmediocre written case analyses.Excellent written analyses “tell a story” about a firm’s strategies. Excellent analysesjustify each major point with reference to critical facts in the case. Ideas and conceptsfrom lectures and the readings are incorporated into the discussion as appropriate andin a seamless way. The application of these ideas and concepts often leads to surprising,counter-intuitive analyses and recommendations. At the end of these excellent writtenanalyses, the reader is absolutely convinced of the wisdom of any finalrecommendations.Mediocre written analyses have few of these attributes. Instead of “telling a story”about a firm’s corporate strategies, these analyses simply repeat the facts andassertions contained in the case. Critical facts in the case are ignored or not integratedinto the paper. For example, these mediocre written analyses will often include asummary and cursory analysis of a firm’s profit and loss statement and its balance sheetbut will fail to discuss the strategic implications of these analyses. The authors of thesereports often seem more interested in making sure that every theory or modelmentioned by in the book is mentioned in the report rather than making sure that thereport tells an integrated story about a firm’s strategy. Often, the different parts ofthese mediocre analyses are not linked—almost as if different people wrote differentsections, but no one took the time to bring these sections together, to discuss theimplications of each section for other sections. These written analyses rarely generateany counter-intuitive or surprising analyses or recommendations. At the end of readingthese reports, the reader is only convinced that, in fact, members of the group read thecase. The reader is not convinced about the wisdom of any final recommendations.Certainly, just answering the study questions associated with each case almost certainlydooms a written case analysis to mediocrity.Points for consideration - does my case study have the following traits:• Relevant information presented in a comprehensive and unbiased fashionExplains adequately the application of the relevant frameworks• Accurate information• Appropriate sources/citations• Well-written• Appropriate structure and flow• Selected appropriate scope for firm issues• Present competitive data, company history and/or additional data and supportingdocumentation where needed• Relevant data and issues clearly identified (or embedded in the case) for the reader toidentifyGeneral hints about good practices and common problems to avoid in your paper:• Focus - Strive to develop a small set of actions or tactics that will work together in acoherent manner. By contrast, do not throw all possible ideas into your paper.Creativity is good – and logical consistency for a viable set of actions is just asimportant.• Pay attention to assumptions - You will have to make assumptions in any project. Forinstance, you will likely make assumptions involving: 1) competitive reactions (e.g., ifand how competing firms will respond to actions you consider), 2) the outcome ofvarious company actions (e.g., product development or clinical trial efforts), 3)patient/consumer responses (e.g., whether citing clinical data is enough to convinceend users that an intervention has medical value). Try to make these assumptions asreasonable as possible, and indicate why you think your assumptions are reasonable.Also, try to think through the possible implications for your recommendations if eachassumption is wrong. Above all, make sure that you explicitly identify the assumptionsyou make. An important part of effective strategy is making sure you know what youdon’t know.• Specify your proposals in a concise, yet concrete manner - Put recommendationsinto concrete terms that managers and/or policy makers would understand and be ableto act on. For instance, it is much more direct to specify that a product "should runpatient testimonial advertisements in magazines targeted to medium- to high-incomepeople over 50 years old” than it would be to simply state that the product "shouldengage in direct to consumer advertising."• Balance analytics and creativity - The most rigorous analytical work does notnecessarily lead to a great idea (ideas can be right without being exciting). In parallel,the most creative ideas do not necessarily hold up to analytical scrutiny (ideas can beexciting without being right). In the early phase of your work, try to cycle back and forthbetween brainstorming (for creative ideas) and careful analysis (for correct ideas). Thisis particularly important when you are trying to identify the concrete offering (e.g.,product/service/intervention) that you will evaluate.SourcesUse a combination of sources to back up your arguments. It is important that thesources you use are accurate, thorough and verifiable. Sources that you can use are thefollowing: scholarly, and/or peer-reviewed articles from the online library of the University; articles from the Google Scholar and ssrn.com; books and book chapters; business magazine and newspaper articles; reports from consulting companies, government agencies or institutions; interview and speech transcripts and recordings; personal communicationsAppendicesAn appendix contains material which is too detailed or technical to include in the bodyof the assignment. Appendices are put at the very end of the coursework. Eachappendix should be clearly, neatly and numbered.Appendices are always supplementary to the assignment. Your assignment must beable to stand alone without the appendices, and the paper must contain all informationincluding tables, diagrams, and results necessary to understand thearguments/discussions. The key point to remember when including an appendix is thatthe information is non-essential; if it were removed, the reader would still be ableto comprehend the significance, validity, and implications of your research.It is appropriate to include appendices for the following reasons: Including this material in the body of the paper that would render it poorlystructured or interrupt the narrative flow; Information is too lengthy and detailed to be easily summarised in the body ofthe paper; Inclusion of helpful, supporting, or useful material would otherwise distract thereader from the main content of the paper; Provides relevant information or data that is more easily understood or analyzedin a self-contained section of the paper; Can be used when there are constraints placed on the length of your paper; and, Provides a place to further demonstrate your understanding of the researchproblem by giving additional details about a new or innovative method,technical details, or design protocols.ReferencesAll citations should be supported with appropriate literature sources. Include allreferences with appropriate formatting in the Harvard Referencing Style.