Assignment: Reflection (GRADED)
First of all, take a deep breath and pat yourself on the back—you worked through the writing and research process to develop a persuasive essay. This is no easy feat, and you did it. Well done!
Now, there is just one more assignment that needs to be completed in the course, and it's an important one. Reflection is a key component of any major project, including writing essays. It gives you an opportunity to look back at your progress in the course, as well as look towards future degree-specific courses.
For this assignment, you will write a reflection that explores your experience of the writing process throughout the course. Consider feedback you received about your argument, your exploration of the issue, and your inclusion of sources. How did the resources you included support your claim?
Be sure to look over the assignment guidelines and rubric below to make sure you're fulfilling each aspect of the assignment.
Assignment Guidelines and Rubric
"Put the argument into a concrete shape, into an image, some hard phrase, round and solid as a ball, which they can see and handle and carry home with them, and the cause is half won."
Ralph Waldo Emerson
Overview:In this assignment, you will write a reflection essay that explores how you chose to incorporate feedback on your argument, your exploration of the issue, and your source integration in the persuasive essay, as well as how your incorporation of resources supported your claim. Additionally, you will note any challenges you faced in incorporating resources and developing your argument throughout the writing process.
Prompt:Previously, you identified an issue in your current major, a major you are interested in pursuing, or your field of work. You then established an argument and supported that argument with research and relevant evidence. In this assignment, you will reflect on how you chose to incorporate feedback concerning your argument, your exploration of the issue, and your integration of sources. Additionally, you will note any challenges you faced in incorporating resources and developing your argument throughout the writing process.
Specifically, the followingcritical elementsmust be addressed:
- Reflection:Each response should be one fully developed paragraph in length (5–8 sentences).
- What peer-review feedback did you choose to incorporate concerning yourargumentand why?
- Whatchallengesdid you face in developing your argument? What could you have done differently?
- What peer-review feedback did you choose to incorporate concerning yourexploration of the issueand why?
- What peer-review feedback did you choose to incorporate concerning youreffective source integrationand why?
- Whatwriting strategieswere most effective in supporting your argument, given your audience, subject, and purpose?
Guidelines for Submission:Save your work in a Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Then,check your writing for errors. Once you haveproofreadyour document,submit itvia theModule 8, 8-4 Reflection Assignmentlink inBrightspace.
Rubric
Critical Elements |
Exemplary |
Proficient |
Needs Improvement |
Not Evident |
Value |
---|
Reflection: Argument
|
Meets "Proficient" criteria and displays cogent connections to specific elements of essay (100%) |
Describes peer feedback that was incorporated into the argument in the final essay and justifies choice (85%) |
Describes peer feedback that was incorporated into the argument in the final essay but does not justify choice (55%) |
Does not describe peer feedback that was incorporated (0%) |
10 |
---|
Reflection: Challenges
|
Meets "Proficient" criteria and demonstrates a nuanced understanding of the reflection process (100%) |
Identifies challenges faced while developing argument and describes what could have been done differently (85%) |
Identifies challenges faced while developing argument but does not describe what could have been done differently (55%) |
Does not identify challenges faced while developing argument (0%) |
30 |
---|
Reflection: Exploration of the Issue
|
Meets "Proficient" criteria and displays cogent connections to specific elements of essay (100%) |
Describes peer feedback that was incorporated into the exploration of the issue in the final essay and justifies choice (85%) |
Describes peer feedback that was incorporated into the exploration of the issue in the final essay but does not justify choice (55%) |
Does not describe peer feedback that was incorporated (0%) |
10 |
---|
Reflection: Effective Source Integration
|
Meets "Proficient" criteria and displays cogent connections to specific elements of essay (100%) |
Describes peer feedback that was incorporated into the effective integration of sources in the final essay and justifies choice (85%) |
Describes peer feedback that was incorporated into the effective integration of sources in the final essay but does not justify choice (55%) |
Does not describe peer feedback that was incorporated (0%) |
10 |
---|
Reflection: Writing Strategies
|
Meets "Proficient" criteria and description is exceptionally clear and contextualized (100%) |
Describes the writing strategies thought to be most effective in supporting the argument, given audience, subject, and purpose (85%) |
Describes the writing strategies felt to be most effective in supporting argument, given audience, subject, and purpose, but description lacks detail (55%) |
Does not describe the writing strategies (0%) |
30 |
---|
Articulation of Response |
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format (100%) |
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization (85%) |
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (55%) |
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas (0%) |
10 |
---|
|
Total |