assignment is attachment 4.07 creating the outline. Use 4.05 for resources and highlighted on 4.05 is the claim and counterclaim make sure you use those in the outline. there are 2 other sources from 4.05 chapter which needs to be included in the outline.
Example Outline Planning Guide Research: Source where you found this information I. Introduction I. Body Part 1 II. State your claim III. Point A A. Make your first point B. Support your first point IV. Counterpoint A A. Present first counterpoint B. Support first counterpoint V. Rebuttal A A. State first rebuttal point B. Support rebuttal point II. A. B. III. A. B. IV. A. B. V. A. B. Body Part II. VI. Point B A. Make your second point B. Support your second point VII. Counterpoint B A. Present second counterpoint B. Support second counterpoint VIII. Rebuttal B A. State second rebuttal point B. Support rebuttal point VI. A. B. VII. A. B. VIII. A. B. Body Part X* *Continue pattern until all points and counterpoints have been addressed. IX. Conclusion IX. Lesson 05: Preparing Your Argument Preparing Your Argument Graphic Organizer Position New York City soda ban is a great decision because it will help to promote healthier lifestyle and reduce health issues such as obesity and diabetes. Audience Identify and describe your audience. My audience will consist of New York citizens who are still confused whether soda ban is a good decision. Research Where did you find this source? How do you know it is credible? Source: https://healthysd.gov/the-debate-over-sugary-drinks/ This source was available on internet. The source and data is credible because it is from a government website (.gov) Source: https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/healthy-drinks/beverages-public-health-concerns/ This source was available on internet. The source and data is credible because it is from a university’s website (Harvard T.H Chan) Source: Chart, graph, infographic: Public Health Concerns: Sugary Drinks (Harvard T.H CHAN, 2021) Image described the different sodas. This source was available on internet. The source and data is credible because it is from a university’s website (Harvard T.H Chan). It shows different categories of drinks available and distinguishing soda from them Writing Your Claim 1. Complete the following sentence: I plan to prove that... I plan to prove that The New York City soda ban is an excellent decision. 2. Cross out "I plan to prove that." What remains is your clearly stated position. Soda should be banned in the New York City despite of the court’s stay on New York's supersized soda ban. 3. Complete the following sentence: This matters because... This matters because soda is harmful for your health. 4. Cross out "This matters because." What remains is your purpose for writing. Soda is harmful for health and nutritionists as well as healthcare specialists have supported this statement. Soda is a relatively easier way of consuming large number of calories in very short period. Most of the calories are from sugars leading to health issues such as diabetes and obesity among citizens. 5. Combine these two thoughts into one sentence; this is your claim. Soda should be banned because it is harmful for health and can lead to health issues such as diabetes and obesity. Your finalized claim: Soda should be banned in New York City because it is harmful for the health of citizens. Identifying the Counterclaim 1. Complete the following sentence: My claim states that... My claim states that Soda is harmful for health of citizens; therefore, it should be banned. 2. Cross out "My claim states that." What remains is your clearly stated position. Soda consumption leads to health issues such as diabetes and obesity, which is supported by nutritionists. Therefore, soda should be banned because it is harmful for health. 3. Complete the following sentence: Some may disagree with me because... Some may disagree with me that soda ban is not a good decision 4. Cross out "Some may disagree with me because." What remains is your purpose for writing. Soda ban will lead to adverse economic impact on small businesses and will also lead to unemployment among people working in soda factories. Moreover, this will also lead to ban on options such as ‘diet soda’, which are not harmful. 5. Combine these two thoughts into one sentence; this is your counterclaim. Soda ban is not a good decision because it will lead to unemployment and adverse economic impact on small business. Your finalized counterclaim: Soda sizes should not be limited as there are many other factors involved in New York's obesity epidemic. Microsoft Word - OTF Report _5-31 Final 1133am_.docx Reversing the Epidemic: The New York City Obesity Task Force Plan to Prevent and Control Obesity May 31, 2012 2 Introduction In December 2011, Mayor Bloomberg announced a significant victory in the battle against obesity: after years of aggressive efforts to improve nutrition and expand physical activity opportunities for all New Yorkers, New York City experienced a small but statistically significant drop in rates of childhood obesity. Bucking national trends, rates of obesity for NYC kindergartners through eighth graders decreased 5.5 percent from 2006 to 2011, with the sharpest declines – 10 percent – seen among children ages 5 to 6 years old. Mayor Bloomberg makes announcement about New York City child obesity rates with Deputy Mayor Gibbs, Health Commissioner Farley and Schools Chancellor Walcott December 15, 2011 (Photo Credit: Kristen Artz) The data on obesity rates remained bleak for adults, however, and although the decline in rates for children was better news, there are still 40 percent who are overweight or obese, a rate higher than the national average. With evidence that targeted local efforts could have an impact on obesity, Mayor Bloomberg charged Deputy Mayor of Health & Human Services Linda Gibbs and Deputy Mayor of Operations Cas Holloway with significantly strengthening the City’s anti- obesity efforts by convening a multi-agency Obesity Task Force that would recommend innovative, aggressive solutions to address the obesity challenge in New York City. The Obesity Task Force was convened in January 2012 and conducted its work over the following several months. Commissioners from eleven City agencies and representatives from the Mayor’s Office participated: Linda Gibbs, Deputy Mayor for Health and Human Services, co-chair Caswell Holloway, Deputy Mayor for Operations, co-chair Alan Aviles, President, Health and Hospitals Corporation Adrian Benepe, Commissioner, Department of Parks and Recreation David Bragdon, Director, Office of Long Term Planning and Sustainability Amanda Burden, Commissioner, Department of City Planning David Burney, FAIA, Commissioner, Department of Design and Construction Robert Doar, Commissioner, Human Resources Administration 3 Dr. Thomas Farley, Commissioner, Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Kim Kessler, Food Policy Coordinator Robert LiMandri, Commissioner, Department of Buildings John Rhea, Chairman, NYC Housing Authority Janette Sadik-Khan, Commissioner, Department of Transportation Carter Strickland, Commissioner, Department of Environmental Protection Dennis Walcott, Chancellor, Department of Education Many of the agencies represented on the Task Force had not previously had a programmatic focus on public health or obesity, but each was engaged in activities that could improve the health of New Yorkers by improving the food environment; making tap water more accessible; making public spaces more amenable to physical activity or active transportation; promoting building design that encouraged physical activity; or marshaling resources to identify and best treat children at risk of obesity-related diseases. The Task Force identified four key goals to guide its work: • Reduce obesity • Address disparities between communities • Reduce preventable health conditions • Create strategies to lower health care spending and lost productivity Three workgroups – Food Environment, Physical Activity/Physical Design, and City Practices -- were convened on multiple occasions to generate and vet innovative ideas. In addition, outside stakeholders were consulted informally and in structured roundtables to brainstorm and refine proposals. The following outlines the findings and recommendations of the Task Force. ***** 4 Finding: Obesity is one of our most serious and rapidly growing health problems New York City – like the rest of the nation – is experiencing an obesity crisis. Obesity is among the most rapidly growing serious health problems we face as Americans. In the early 1960s it affected only 13 percent of Americans; by 2007-2008 one-third (34 percent) were obese.i It is also a leading cause of preventable death, second only to tobacco, and kills 5,800 New York City residents per year. Being overweight or obese is now the norm in our city: 58 percent of adults – or a total of 3,437,000 people – are overweight or obese. And the obesity epidemic strikes hardest in communities already suffering from health and economic disparities, particularly our black, Latino and low-income communities where the rate of overweight and obesity reaches 70 percent in some neighborhoods. Source: NYC Community Health Survey (CHS) 2002-2010, Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) 2001-2011, NYC FITNESSGRAM 2006-2010. Obesity statistics are even more startling among NYC’s youth, despite recent progress. Among NYC children ages 6-11 years, 21.3 percent are obese versus 19.6 percent nationally.ii Even more are overweight and on a path to obesity once they are adults. The obesity epidemic, if left unchecked, threatens to reverse the enormous progress made in health and life expectancy in recent decades.iii If obesity rates continue to grow, this generation of children may live shorter lives than their parents. Obesity is not a cosmetic problem. Epidemic obesity has led to massive increases in prevalence of Type II diabetes, which can result in blindness, hypertension, and amputations. One in three adult New Yorkers now either has diabetes or a condition known as pre-diabetes. Obesity also 5 increases cancer, heart disease, arthritis, depression, asthma and a host of other problems. Severe obesity leads many to immobility and depression. In NYC as of 2007, there were 2,600 hospitalizations for amputations related to diabetes and 1,400 people who end up on dialysis due to diabetes.iv In addition, applying national estimates to the NYC population, over 100,000 adults have diabetic retinopathy (eye disease) which if untreated, can lead to blindness.v Finding: Obesity has a disproportionate impact on low-income and minority communities The toll of obesity and resulting diabetes is striking New Yorkers unequally