Assignment Instruction PDF attached as well. Please note Instructions as given below :- 1.Articles should be yr 2009 onward ( yr XXXXXXXXXXWord limit should be between XXXXXXXXXXReferences exclude...

Assignment Instruction PDF attached as well. Please note Instructions as given below :- 1.Articles should be yr 2009 onward ( yr 2009-2016) 2.Word limit should be between 5750-6200 3. References exclude word limit 4. Kotter's eight step changes model can be used to improve ISBAR (Part2 of assingment). 5.I have included reference list as well, which may be useful 6. Part 1 of assignment is to discuss concept of quality improvement and reole of ACSQHC 7. APA referencing style - min 40-50 references 8. We need this assignment by 2June for review. So we have to pass this assignment. FURTHER ASSIGNMENT UNI INFORMATION GIVEN BELOW.- Assessment title: Assignment 2 Change Management Alignment with learning outcome(s): This assessment aligns with the following learning outcomes: Examine the impact of health policy on nursing management Critique extant theories of power and their application to health care settings Appraise the characteristics of effective organisations through the use of continuous improvement strategies Critically analyse theories of change management and their application to health care settings Details of task: This assignment is in 2 parts: Part 1 Discuss the concept of quality improvement and its importance in health care. In your discussion consider the role of the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) and the role of the Victorian State Government Department of Health and Human Services in quality, safety and service improvement within hospitals and health services. Part 2 A key focus of quality improvement for the ACSQHC is clinical communication. To assist health services with improving clinical handover, the ACSQHC has published “The OSSIE Guide to Clinical Handover Improvement” (available: http://www.safetyandquality. gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/ossie.pdf ) The implementation of any improvement such as this requires clinicians to change their practice. In this unit we have looked at a number of approaches and theories related to implementing organisational change. In this part of your assignment you are required to use change management theory to critically review the “The OSSIE Guide to Clinical Handover Improvement”. 14 Release date (where applicable): N/A Due date: Friday 10 June 2016 by 23:00 hrs Word limit: 5,000 – 6,000 words Value: 50% Presentation requirements: In addition to the usual assignment presentation requirements, (described later in this unit guide) when completing this paper ensure that you provide an introduction and conclusion for Part 1 and Part 2. There is no need to provide an overall conclusion for the paper at the end of Part 2. A single reference list is required. Estimated return date: 11 July 2016 Hurdle requirements (where applicable): Please note Assignment 2 is considered an academic hurdle. Students must achieve a pass (50%) in this assignment to pass the unit. Individual assessment in group tasks (where applicable): N/A Criteria for marking: Attribute Task Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction 1. Students embark on inquiry and so determine a need for knowledge/ understanding Identify the key concepts within the task, and determine knowledge required to complete task. Total: 15 marks ☐ Key concepts from the task not addressed ☐ Response to task irrelevant 0-6 marks ☐ Limited identification of key concepts ☐ Response to task mostly irrelevant 7-8 marks ☐ Some key concepts from the tasks identified but in a limited capacity ☐ Response to task contains some irrelevancies 9-10 marks ☐ Most of the key concepts and issues are identified ☐ Appropriate response to task 11-12 marks ☐ All of the key concepts and issues are identified ☐ Appropriate response to task ☐ Demonstrates insight and ability to apply knowledge gained to other situations 13-15 marks 2. Students find/generate needed information /data using appropriate methodology Gather relevant information from a variety of sources including unit textbook and readings Total: 15 marks ☐ No evidence of research ☐ Irrelevant theories and concepts are used 0-6 marks ☐ Limited evidence of research ☐ Limited number of sources ☐ Sources are mostly old or out of date ☐ Theories and concepts do not clearly address task 7-8 marks ☐ Some evidence of research ☐ Satisfactory number of sources ☐ A mix of out of date and contemporary sources ☐ Some theories and concepts are irrelevant 9-10 marks ☐ Evidence of wide research ☐ Large number of sources ☐ Sources are mostly contemporary ☐ Relevant theories and concepts obtained from sources 11-12 marks ☐ Evidence of extensive research ☐ A broad range of sources ☐ Contemporary sources used throughout ☐ Highly relevant theories and concepts obtained from sources 13-15 marks 16 3. Students critically evaluate information /data Evaluate information on the bases of academic reliability and credibility, currency, and arguments presented. Total: 10 marks ☐ No sources used to back up concepts, issues, or theories 0-4 marks ☐ Sources used to back up concepts, issues, or theories are not credible ☐ Poorly presented or misinterpreted information 5 marks ☐ Limited use of sources to back up concepts, issues, or theories ☐ Some sources are not credible ☐ Some poorly presented or misinterpreted information 6 marks ☐ Appropriate use of sources to back up concepts, issues, or theories ☐ Sources are credible ☐ Information appropriate presented and interpreted 7-8 marks ☐ Excellent use of sources to back up concepts, issues, or theories ☐ Sources are highly credible ☐ Highly effective presentation and interpretation of information 9-10 marks