AssignmentDetails:Interview a fellow peer in your class who works in a different health discipline...

Question

AssignmentDetails:Interview a fellow peer in your class who works in a different  health discipline than you. Begin your interview with the following  questions:	What is your role as a health care team member?	How do you define professionalism and how does professional responsibility influence your work?	Do you consider leaders in your organization stewards of health care? Why or Why not?	Is it important to you that leaders exercise professional advocacy  and authenticity as well as power and influence when working with  colleagues? Why or why not?In 500-750 words, summarize your interview and share your impressions of your peer's responses.Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the  APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is  not required.This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the  rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the  rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the  assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the  assignment.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the  directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be  submitted to Turnitin.Please Note: Assignment will not be  submitted to the faculty member until the "Submit" button under "Final  Submission" is clicked.New Attempt						Title			Attached Documents			Turnitin Report			Similarity Index			Final Submission											Click 'New Attempt' to start assignment or attach documents																Apply Rubrics				Professional Identity and Stewardship - Part I: Peer Interview																																						1Unsatisfactory 0-71%0.00%																						2Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%75.00%																						3Satisfactory 76-79%79.00%																						4Good 80-89%89.00%																						5Excellent 90-100%100.00%																																		80.0 %								Content																																									80.0 %								Detailed Summary of Peer Interview																						Summary of peer interview is not provided or is incomplete.															Summary of peer review is unclear or inconsistent with professionalism and the role of stewardship.															Summary of peer review is clear, but one of the four components of the interview is lacking.															Summary of peer review is provided with  detailed explanation of each component of professionalism, stewardship,  advocacy, and authenticity.															Comprehensive summary of peer review is  provided with detailed explanations of each component of professional  identity and a thoughtful discussion of the interviewer's perceptions of  the interview experience.																											15.0 %								Organization and Effectiveness																																									5.0 %								Thesis Development and Purpose																						Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.															Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.															Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.															Thesis and/or main claim are clear and  forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective  of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.															Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive;  contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis  statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.																											5.0 %								Paragraph Development and Transitions																						Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack  unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are  established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope.  Organization is disjointed.															Some paragraphs and transitions may lack  logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness.  Some degree of organization is evident.															Paragraphs are generally competent, but  ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their  relationships to each other.															A logical progression of ideas between  paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and  cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to  purpose.															There is a sophisticated construction of  paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other.  Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph  structure is seamless.																											5.0 %								Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)																						Surface errors are pervasive enough that  they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or  sentence construction are used.															Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors  distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register),  sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.															Some mechanical errors or typos are present,  but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence  structure and audience-appropriate language are used.															Prose is largely free of mechanical errors,  although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and  effective figures of speech are used.															Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.																											5.0 %								Format																																									5.0 %								Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)																						Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.															Template is used, but some elements are  missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.															Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.															Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.															All format elements are correct.																											100 %								Total Weightage

David · Accepted Answer

Running Header: Interview and summary of findings 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Title: Interview and summary of findings 
Presented By: 
Presented To: 
Date: 8/6/2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interview and summary of findings 
2 
 
Interview and summary of findings 
Preface:  
For this interview, I made the selection of a peer who is working in the clinical psychology health care 
domain. I made a very detailed analysis of my classmate perceptions towards profession by making a 
good interview. The following part of the interview is focused on focused questions about the health 
care as well as the professionalism, the answers provided by my class mate are provided below in the 
observations made from the interview.
Summary of observations: 
My class mate indicated that he is doing primary health care in the psychological domain for the 
patients. Typically he will work to render assistance and health care advice for the people who are 
depressed as well who are seriously disturbed due to racial discriminations, domestic violence and 
community suppressions etc. Also, he indicated that he is providing services to the people who are 
victims of workplace bullying and gender discrimination practices. Basically,

Assignment Details: Interview a fellow peer in your class who works in a different health discipline than you. Begin your interview with the following questions: What is your role as a health care...

Answer To: Assignment Details: Interview a fellow peer in your class who works in a different health discipline...

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment