Assignment and marking criteria added in that
ME504 [Advanced Networking] Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines School School of IT and Engineering (SITE) Course Name Master of Engineering (MENG) Unit Code ME504 Unit Title Advanced Networking Assessment Author Dr Noor u Zaman Laghari Assessment Type Individual Assessment Title Assignment 1 – Detailed design of a modern network for a multi building campus Unit Learning Outcomes covered in This assessment The purpose of this assignment is to design and develop NETWORK requirements, which can be implemented with LAN/WLAN/WAN services for a University Campus (any campus having multiple buildings). The design of network and service must be specific so that it can be used for a purpose of a quotation and proposal from vendors and internet service providers. After the assignment, students are expected to learn not only the knowledge and current technical aspects of advanced networking but also research, data collection, analysis and writing skills, which are very important and helpful. The following ULOs: a. Model and critically compare LAN and WAN network technologies, topologies and implementation; b. Configure, test and troubleshoot various network devices including routers and switches c. Evaluate, different WAN protocols; such as HDLC, PPP, Frame Relay, DHCP, ISDN, NAT and PAT in a network environment, and configure, verify, troubleshoot related equipment; Weight 10% of Total Assessment Total Marks 60 Word limit Maximum 1500-2500 words Release Date Week 6 Due Date 11:55 PM Friday 04 January 2019 (Week 7) ME504 Advanced Networking, T3 2018 Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Dr Noor U Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Sharly J Halder December, 2018 Submission Guidelines • All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page. • The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. • Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using APA or IEEE referencing style for School of Business and School of Information Technology and Engineering respectively. Extension If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly to the School's Administration Officer, in Melbourne on Level 6 or in Sydney on Level 7. You must submit this application three working days prior to the due date of the assignment. Further information is available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures- andguidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment Last updated: Aug, 2018 Academic Misconduct Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about- mit/institutepublications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic- MisconductPolicy-Procedure. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description. Assignment Description Tasks: There are two parts to this assignment, i.e. part A and part B. A. Research and propose a modern network for a multi (five) building university campus with internet and wireless access. Details description is as under. 60 marks Description: There are three (3) areas to consider for advanced network design in this assignment. 1. Propose a detailed design/layout for a campus having multiple buildings; 2. Design LAN (including Wireless LAN) and WAN services for the users 3. Research about LAN, wireless LAN and WAN technologies (Equipment, protocols and services) 4. Report must include: a. Introduction b. Building diagram (this need to be virtually assumed according to you own thinking) c. Scopes and Limitations d. Requirements (Network LAN,WLAN, WAN) e. Solution Design http://www.mit.edu.au/about http://www.mit.edu.au/about http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure ME504 Advanced Networking, T3 2018 Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Dr Noor U Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Sharly J Halder December, 2018 f. Logical Design and physical Design g. Network structure/topologies h. Protocols, technologies and services i. IP addressing ( IPv4 and Ipv6) j. Security features, policies, redundancy k. Provision of wired and wireless internet for staff and student References “CISCO-Campus LAN and Wireless LAN Design Guide”- https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/solutions/CVD/Campus/CVD-Campus-LAN-WLAN-Design- Guide-2018JAN.pdf Marking criteria: Example of marking criteria is shown in following table. Marks are allocated as follows, whist details marking guide can be seen in the Moodle submission link: Note: The marking criteria varies for each assignment Section to be included in the report Detailed Description of the Criteria Marks Introduction A brief introduction should be included (4-5 sentences) 3 Report Layout The document should include all necessary headings, texts, figures, citations and sections to depict services and network design. Structure (format) and contents quality will be used for markings 2 Scope Scope of the networking project should be clearly defined with the help of appropriate description and tools (figures and tables) need to be included to properly show the margins and requirements. 10 Design/Solutions This section should include proper headings and contents to propose a solution for the campus network. Wireless LAN solution needs to be included. LAN and WAN need to be shown with network topology. 15 Protocols and Technologies Analyse and compare protocols, technologies and services for LAN, WLAN and WAN. 10 LAN and WAN services design and analysis LAN/WAN services design and analysis including VPWS, VPLS, VPRN, Ethernet (MEF) services 5 Internet Detailed design for the provision of wired and wireless internet to staff and students 5 Summary A report Summary must be included at the end of the report 5 ME504 Advanced Networking, T3 2018 Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Dr Noor U Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Sharly J Halder December, 2018 References Follow IEEE style for the references 5 Total 60 Marking Rubric for Assignment #: Total Marks 60 Note: The marking criteria varies for each assignment Marking Rubric Criteria/ Grades High Distinction (HD) [Excellent] >80% Distinction (D) [Very Good] 70%-80% Credits (C) [Good] 60%-70% Pass (P) [Satisfactory] 50%- 60% Fail (N) [Unsatisfactory] <50% criteria 1 all topics are pertinent and covered in depth. ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated topics are relevant and soundly analysed. generally relevant and analysed. some relevance and briefly presented. this is not relevant to the assignment topic. criteria 2 exceptional report layout, style and language used very good report layout, style and language used good report layout, style and language used acceptable report layout, style and language used. poor report layout, style and language used. criteria 3 demonstrated excellent ability to define the project scope/boundari es/margins and general requirements demonstrated excellent ability to define the project scope/boundarie s/margins and general requirements demonstrated ability to define the project scope/boundaries/ margins and general requirements demonstrated ability to define the project scope/boundaries/ margins and general requirements did not demonstrate ability to define the project scope/boundaries/ margins and general requirements criteria 4 demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but did not source reference material appropriately demonstrated ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately demonstrated ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately did not demonstrate ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately criteria 5 excellent understanding of lan/wan and wlan architecture and applications very good understanding of lan/wan and wlan architecture and applications good understanding of lan/wan and wlan architecture and criteria="" 1="" all="" topics="" are="" pertinent="" and="" covered="" in="" depth.="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" and="" source="" material="" is="" demonstrated="" topics="" are="" relevant="" and="" soundly="" analysed.="" generally="" relevant="" and="" analysed.="" some="" relevance="" and="" briefly="" presented.="" this="" is="" not="" relevant="" to="" the="" assignment="" topic.="" criteria="" 2="" exceptional="" report="" layout,="" style="" and="" language="" used="" very="" good="" report="" layout,="" style="" and="" language="" used="" good="" report="" layout,="" style="" and="" language="" used="" acceptable="" report="" layout,="" style="" and="" language="" used.="" poor="" report="" layout,="" style="" and="" language="" used.="" criteria="" 3="" demonstrated="" excellent="" ability="" to="" define="" the="" project="" scope/boundari="" es/margins="" and="" general="" requirements="" demonstrated="" excellent="" ability="" to="" define="" the="" project="" scope/boundarie="" s/margins="" and="" general="" requirements="" demonstrated="" ability="" to="" define="" the="" project="" scope/boundaries/="" margins="" and="" general="" requirements="" demonstrated="" ability="" to="" define="" the="" project="" scope/boundaries/="" margins="" and="" general="" requirements="" did="" not="" demonstrate="" ability="" to="" define="" the="" project="" scope/boundaries/="" margins="" and="" general="" requirements="" criteria="" 4="" demonstrated="" excellent="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" and="" sourced="" reference="" material="" appropriately="" demonstrated="" excellent="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" but="" did="" not="" source="" reference="" material="" appropriately="" demonstrated="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" and="" sourced="" reference="" material="" appropriately="" demonstrated="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" and="" did="" not="" source="" reference="" material="" appropriately="" did="" not="" demonstrate="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" and="" did="" not="" source="" reference="" material="" appropriately="" criteria="" 5="" excellent="" understanding="" of="" lan/wan="" and="" wlan="" architecture="" and="" applications="" very="" good="" understanding="" of="" lan/wan="" and="" wlan="" architecture="" and="" applications="" good="" understanding="" of="" lan/wan="" and="" wlan="" architecture="">50% criteria 1 all topics are pertinent and covered in depth. ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated topics are relevant and soundly analysed. generally relevant and analysed. some relevance and briefly presented. this is not relevant to the assignment topic. criteria 2 exceptional report layout, style and language used very good report layout, style and language used good report layout, style and language used acceptable report layout, style and language used. poor report layout, style and language used. criteria 3 demonstrated excellent ability to define the project scope/boundari es/margins and general requirements demonstrated excellent ability to define the project scope/boundarie s/margins and general requirements demonstrated ability to define the project scope/boundaries/ margins and general requirements demonstrated ability to define the project scope/boundaries/ margins and general requirements did not demonstrate ability to define the project scope/boundaries/ margins and general requirements criteria 4 demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but did not source reference material appropriately demonstrated ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately demonstrated ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately did not demonstrate ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately criteria 5 excellent understanding of lan/wan and wlan architecture and applications very good understanding of lan/wan and wlan architecture and applications good understanding of lan/wan and wlan architecture and>