Assignment-4.for applied project,kindly review the attached document.please ensure that PPT slides must, and word document for 2000 words.it should be clear and brief.
Microsoft Word - SBM1203_2020_latest : SBM1203 Venture/Project Economics and Finance Assessment Overview Assessment Task Weighting Due Length ULO CLOs Assessment 4: Applied Project :Project Economic and Finance Analysis and presentation slides: Individual assignment on analysing realworld (simulated) financial data and information and interpreting the outcomes using the concept and principles of finance you have learnt in this unit and submission of presentation slides 40% Report 30% and Presentation slides 10%) Week- 12 2000 word And power point presentation slides ULO-1 ULO-2 ULO-3 ULO-4 CLO-1 CLO-4 CLO-7 CLO-8 CLO-9 -9318 8111 10 | P a g e Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D Approved: 15/04/2020 Version Assessment 4: Applied Project Economic and Finance Analysis and presentation slides: Due date: Week12 Group/individual: Individual Word count / Time provided: 2000 words and PP presentation slides Weighting: 40% (30% report, 10% powerpoint presentation slides) Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO-1, ULO-2, ULO-3, ULO-4 Assessment Details: This assessment is designed to assess your technical, financial, economical and analytical skills in planning , evaluating and implementing a project effectively and efficiently You are required to select a real life project from an organisation of your selection and prepare the report and provide presentation slide. Assume that your have been hired by a contractor wishing to prepare and submit an economical and Financial analysis report of the case project. You should prepare a financial report that focuses on economical aspects of the case project. All submissions should be in MS Word format. In this assignment, the following information should be included: 1. Information about the case project in particular the decision-making situation in which financial/Economical analysis is being applied. In this regard alternatives and their differences should be clearly defined. 2. Assumptions made for modelling and analysis including interest rates, inflation, project life, exchange rate, etc. 3. Risks involved in the case project 4. Cash inflows and outflows for each alternative 5. Financial Analysis of the Case Project 6. Sensitivity Analysis of the Case Project including scenarios for risk and analysis of each scenario. 7. Other non-financial decision making factors involved in the case project (if any) 8. Selection of best alternative 9. Recommendation For successful completion of this assessment, you are required to study the material provided (lecture slides, tutorials, and reading materials) and engage in the unit’s activities. Students are expected to discuss their work with tutor / lecturer and to seek support. Submission of the MS-Word file and the MS-PowerPoint file needs to be then made into Canvas before the stipulated deadline. In completing this assessment successfully, you will be able to effectively perform project initiation which will help in achieving ULO-1, ULO-2, ULO-3, ULO-4 and ULO-5. 11 | P a g e Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D Approved: 15/04/2020 Version Marking Criteria and Rubric: The assessment (Written submission and presentation combined) will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 40% of the total unit mark. Marking Criteria Not satisfactory (0-49%) of the criterion mark) Satisfactory (50-64%) of the criterion mark Good (65-74%) of the criterion mark Very Good (75-84%) of the criterion mark Excellent (85-100%) of the criterion mark Written Assignment Structure and Flow (10%): Appropriate structure with informative headings; smooth flow Poor structure and flow with informative headings. Assignment template modified. Satisfactory structure and flow with informative headings. Assignment template modified. Good structure and flow with informative headings. Generally, follows assignment template. Very good structure and flow with informative headings. Follows assignment template Excellent structure and flow with informative headings. Follows assignment template Conceptual foundation of the business model (20%) understanding & knowledge of organisation & product/services profile and the business model Inadequate and poor understanding of concepts and limited work of organisation & product/services profile and the business model Basic knowledge & understanding of organisation & product/services profile and the business model Demonstrated limited capacity of understanding of organisation & product/services profile and the business model Demonstrated a good grasp of organisation & product/services profile and the business model; good knowledge of basic business model and how they can be applied for practical application Demonstrated exceptional knowledge of concepts and their practical application of organisation & product/services profile and the business model and it’s practical application Market and Marketing feasibility analysis (20%) Understanding of scenario analysis, market feasibility and marketing feasibility analysis with demonstrated application for the project Inadequate and poor understanding of scenario analysis, market feasibility and marketing feasibility analysis with demonstrated application for the project Basic knowledge only on scenario analysis, market feasibility and marketing feasibility analysis with demonstrated application for the project Demonstrated limited capacity of understanding of scenario analysis, market feasibility and marketing feasibility analysis with demonstrated application for the project Demonstrated a good grasp of scenario analysis, market feasibility and marketing feasibility analysis with demonstrated application for the project Demonstrated exceptional knowledge of scenario analysis, market feasibility and marketing feasibility analysis with demonstrated application for the project Financial feasibility and Risk analysis (20%) demonstrated knowledge & application of Financial feasibility and risk analysis Inadequate and poor understanding of Financial feasibility and Risk evaluation and conclusion Basic knowledge only on Financial feasibility and Risk evaluation and conclusion Demonstrated limited capacity of understanding of Financial feasibility and Risk evaluation and conclusion Demonstrated a good grasp of Financial feasibility and Risk evaluation and conclusion Demonstrated exceptional knowledge of Financial feasibility and Risk evaluation and conclusion Presentation assignment 13 | P a g e Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D Approved: 15/04/2020 Version Visual Appeal Presentation slides, clarity, grammar, spelling and engaging (10 %s) Lack of evidence of written skills (no visual appeal). The slides were difficult to read and too much information had been copied onto them. There are many errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Evidence of basic skills of communicating (writing) in project environment. Minimal effort made to make slides appealing Has given a factual and/or conceptual skill base in communication (writing) in project environment. There are some errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. In some slides, too much information on two or more slides. Good visual appeal. Has very good skills in communicating (writing) a project report in slides. There are few errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Very good visual appeal. Has excellent skills in communicating (writing) a project report in slides. There are no errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Information is clear and concise on each slide. Excellent visually appeal that is engaging. Marking Criteria Not satisfactory (0-49%) of the criterion mark) Satisfactory (50-64%) of the criterion mark Good (65-74%) of the criterion mark Very Good (75-84%) of the criterion mark Excellent (85-100%) of the criterion mark Comprehension and Content of slides General knowledge of the selected project case (10 %) Lack of evidence of comprehensive knowledge in the topic. Majority of information irrelevant to the selected project case. Evidence of basic knowledge in the topic. Basic information about the project background and lack of evidence of comprehensive knowledge of the assignment content into the slides. Has given a factual and/or conceptual knowledge to the case project, identifying project stakeholders and writing stakeholders register Good evidence of comprehensive knowledge of the assignment content into the slides. Reasonable knowledge of background of case project and very good level of awareness of assignment content into the slides. Extensive comprehension knowledge of topic. Members showed complete understanding of the sleeted project and project scope statement. Accurately included all written report content. For both Presentation and written assignment Referencing and Grammar: (10%) Harvard formatting style and citation of references in the body of the report structure, grammar and presentation Includes identifying information with many errors in format. Paper is poorly organized and difficult to read – does not flow logically from one part to another. There are several spelling and/or grammatical errors; technical terms may not be defined or are poorly defined. Writing lacks clarity and conciseness Includes identifying information with some errors in format. Paper shows some organization. At times, difficult to read and does not flow logically from one part to another. There are some spelling and/or grammatical errors; technical terms are generally are poorly defined. All references cited correctly using citation style with some minor errors. Paper is generally well organized and most of