Assignment 3. With 10 to 15 ppt slides
Page 4 of 7 Page 4 of 7 applied the law appropriately (20 marks) added their individual remark. have added their individual remark. group members have added their individual remark. have added their individual remark. their individual remark. Clarity of Expression (10 marks) Writing lacks clarity and coherence. Points have not been paraphrased well. There are many errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. . Writing is generally clear with some lapses in coherence. Some points have been paraphrased well. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Writing is clear and coherent. Most points have been paraphrased well. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Writing shows good clarity and cohesion. Points have been paraphrased well. There are few errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Writing shows excellent clarity and cohesion. Points have been skilfully paraphrased. There are no or very few errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Reference and Formatting (10 marks) Assignment mostly failed to adhere to APIC Harvard style of referencing. Assignment only show some adherence to APIC Harvard style of referencing. Assignment mostly adheres to APIC Harvard style of referencing. With few inconsistencies, Assignment mostly completely adheres to APIC assessment presentation guidelines with few inconsistencies with APIC Harvard style of referencing. Assignment completely adheres to APIC Harvard style of referencing. . Assessment 3: Essay and Presentation Due date: Week 11 (Assignment submission) and week 12(Presentation) Group/individual: Individual Word count / Time provided: 2000 words Weighting: 40% (25% submission and 15% presentation) Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO-1, ULO-2, ULO-4, Assignment details: The Essay Assessment requires students to demonstrate their knowledge of the Australian business law, concepts, and rules. To successfully answer the questions, the analysis, the discussions, and examinations of topics must be supported by the relevant sections of the law, cases, examples, journal articles and books. For this Assessment, students must answer four questions. You are expected to write about 500 words for each question, and total of 2000 words for Assessment 3. Essay Questions 1. By giving at least four different examples, explain the different business structures. To completely answer this question, you must define each business structure, explain the legal requirements to establish each business structure and explain the differences between each business structures. 2. Examine the legal protections provided under the Australian Consumer Law for consumers. To completely answer this question, you are required to Page 5 of 7 Page 5 of 7 support your discussion with the relevant sections of the law and provide relevant court cases that show the legal protections provided under Australian Consumer Law. 3. Identify the essential elements that should be fulfilled to have a valid contract, and by giving relevant examples, elaborate the available remedies if there is breach of a contract. To completely answer this question, you need to support your answer with the relevant sections of the law and relevant examples. 4. Discuss the different aspects of legal risks of doing business. You can answer this question from the perspective of negligence, tort, business crimes and business ethics. You will make a presentation on the main points of your answers for the Essay questions. The presentation must show the main findings and you have 10 minutes to complete the presentation, and 5 minutes to answer questions. Marking Criteria and Rubric: The assessment (Written submission and presentation combined) will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 40% of the total unit mark. Marking Criteria Not satisfactory (0-49%) of the criterion mark) Satisfactory (50-64%) of the criterion mark Good (65-74%) of the criterion mark Very Good (75-84%) of the criterion mark Excellent (85-100%) of the criterion mark Analysis and accuracy of answer – demonstrated knowledge (20 marks) Question 1 Demonstrated Inadequate and poor understanding of Australian Business Law concepts and their practical application Demonstrated reasonable understanding of Australian Business Law concepts and their practical application with necessary adjustments. Demonstrated good understanding of Australian Business Law concepts and their practical application with necessary adjustments. Demonstrated very good understanding of Australian Business Law concepts and their practical application with necessary adjustments. Demonstrated exceptional understanding of Australian Business Law concepts and their practical application with necessary adjustments. Analysis and accuracy of answer – demonstrated knowledge (20 marks) Question 2 Demonstrated Inadequate and poor understanding of Australian Business Law concepts and their practical application Demonstrated reasonable understanding of Australian Business Law concepts and their practical application with necessary adjustments. Demonstrated good understanding of Australian Business Law concepts and their practical application with necessary adjustments. Demonstrated very good understanding of Australian Business Law concepts and their practical application with necessary adjustments. Demonstrated exceptional understanding of Australian Business Law concepts and their practical application with necessary adjustments. Analysis and accuracy of answer – demonstrated knowledge (20 marks) Question 3 Demonstrated Inadequate and poor understanding of Australian Business Law concepts and their practical application Demonstrated reasonable understanding of Australian Business Law concepts and their practical application with Demonstrated good understanding of Australian Business Law concepts and their practical application with Demonstrated very good understanding of Australian Business Law concepts and their practical application with Demonstrated exceptional understanding of Australian Business Law concepts and their practical application with Page 6 of 7 Page 6 of 7 necessary adjustments. necessary adjustments. necessary adjustments. necessary adjustments. Analysis and accuracy of answer – demonstrated knowledge (20 marks) Question 4 Demonstrated Inadequate and poor understanding of Australian Business Law concepts and their practical application Demonstrated reasonable understanding of Australian Business Law concepts and their practical application with necessary adjustments. Demonstrated good understanding of Australian Business Law concepts and their practical application with necessary adjustments. Demonstrated very good understanding of Australian Business Law concepts and their practical application with necessary adjustments. Demonstrated exceptional understanding of Australian Business Law concepts and their practical application with necessary adjustments. Clarity of Expression (10 marks) Writing lacks clarity and coherence. Points have not been paraphrased well. There are many errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. . Writing is generally clear with some lapses in coherence. Some points have been paraphrased well. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Writing is clear and coherent. Most points have been paraphrased well. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Writing shows good clarity and cohesion. Points have been paraphrased well. There are few errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Writing shows excellent clarity and cohesion. Points have been skilfully paraphrased. There are no errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Reference and Formatting (10 marks) Assignment is not presented as per APIC assessment presentation guidelines and includes insufficient application of APIC Harvard style of referencing. Assignment show some adherence to APIC assessment presentation guidelines and APIC Harvard style of referencing. Assignment mostly adheres to APIC assessment presentation guidelines and APIC Harvard style of referencing. Assignment completely adheres to APIC assessment presentation guidelines with few inconsistencies with APIC Harvard style of referencing. Assignment completely adheres to APIC assessment presentation guidelines and APIC Harvard style of referencing. PRESENTATION Comprehension Of the presentation. (60 Marks) Presentation is poorly structured, and the main points are not accurately included Presentation is reasonably structured, and the main points are included with some points missing. Presentation is mostly structured, and the main points included with one or two points missing. Presentation is highly structured, and the main points are mostly accurately included Presentation is highly structured, and the main points accurately included Visual Appeal Presentation slides, clarity, grammar, spelling and engaging (20 marks) Poor presentation skill. The slides were difficult to read and too much information had been copied onto them. There are many errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. No Visual appeal. Partially good presentation skills. critical review of the chosen case. Minimal effort made to make