ASSIGNMENT 1-B and 2 are combined assignment on the basis of ass-1 which is uploaded on the link given by the expert monica in chat box.the assignment is all about stake holders of the industry to make it competitive.and u can use the references from ass-1 also.
SM - Assessment 1_Trade Me Analysis by Diogo Cris De Lara Submission date: 23-Jun-2018 06:11PM (UTC+1200) Submission ID: 976950064 File name: 60256_Diogo_Cris_De_Lara_SM_-_Assessment_1_Trade_Me_Analysis_540315_774456297.pdf Word count: 3964 Character count: 23192 7% SIMILARITY INDEX 1% INTERNET SOURCES 0% PUBLICATIONS 6% STUDENT PAPERS 1 1% 2 1% 3 1% 4 1% 5 1% 6 1% 7 <1% 8=""><1% 9="" sm="" -="" assessment="" 1_trade="" me="" analysis="" originality="" report="" primary="" sources="" submitted="" to="" auckland="" institute="" of="" studies="" student="" paper="" submitted="" to="" mfh="" international="" institute="" student="" paper="" submitted="" to="" university="" of="" sydney="" student="" paper="" submitted="" to="" embry="" riddle="" aeronautical="" university="" student="" paper="" submitted="" to="" victoria="" university="" of="" wellington="" student="" paper="" submitted="" to="" anglia="" ruskin="" university="" student="" paper="" submitted="" to="" university="" of="" auckland="" student="" paper="" submitted="" to="" massey="" university="" student="" paper="" submitted="" to="" city="" university="" of="" hong="" kong=""><1% 10=""><1% 11=""><1% 12=""><1% 13=""><1% 14=""><1% exclude quotes of f exclude bibliography of f exclude matches of f student paper submitted to bryan college student paper submitted to turun yliopisto student paper www.oecd.org internet source enrico bonetti. "the effectiveness of meta‐ brands in the typical product industry: mozzarella cheese", british food journal, 2004 publicat ion submitted to british school of commerce - colombo student paper sm - assessment 1_trade me analysis by diogo cris de lara sm - assessment 1_trade me analysis originality report primary sources auckland international campus cx770020 strategic management page | 6 assessment 1: part b instructions (individual) write an individual report that demonstrates critical reflection around the following: stakeholders and wider issues 1. consider the expectations of stakeholders by discussing a wide range of relevant issues, such as environmental sustainability, ethics, leadership, culture, the global environment, and making workplaces fit for humans. 2. how could responding to these expectations and issues, to create competitive advantage for a business? report structure your report could have the following structure: title page (includes title of the proposal, name of the person the report is for, date submitted) table of contents introduction stakeholders and wider issue o stakeholders expectation and wider issues o responding to create competitive advantage conclusion note that you must use appropriate referencing (in text and a reference list). referencing the source of concepts, tools and techniques is an important aspect to enhance the credibility of your evaluation. word count the word count excludes your reference list and appendix. plagiarism plagiarism is a form of academic dishonesty. cases of dishonesty are regarded as serious by otago polytechnic. see the course outline and opaic policies about this. minimum achievement requirement you must achieve a combined minimum of 40% for the individual reports (assessment 1: part b and assessment 2) for a mark below 40% the lecturer will reduce the marks for all other assessments (assessment 1: part a, and assessment 3) to the same level, unless compelling evidence exists of the student’s contribution to these assessments. for a mark between 40% and 50% the lecturer may also reduce the marks for all other assessments (assessment 1:part a, and assessment 3) to the same level. the lecturer may make a determination about this adjustment based on the individual’s contribution to group work in class, attendance and other factors indicating individual effort and contribution. the lecturer could also assign additional work, or a resubmission of all or selected parts of the assignment. however, such determination will be the exception, and is at the discretion of the lecturer. auckland international campus cx770020 strategic management page | 7 submission the reports for assessment 1: part b, and assessment 2 will be submitted as one combined report on moodle. this is done to simplify the submission process of these individual reports for students. marking rubric – individual report p e rf e c t e x c e lle n t v e ry g o o d g o o d a b o v e a v e ra g e a v e ra g e b e lo w a v e ra g e in a d e q u a te p o o r v e ry p o o r % 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 percentages are indicative introduction: purpose of the report, key focus of this report, brief description of the organisation. 5 introduction judged by how well it prepares the reader for the content of the report. stakeholders and wider issues 1- stakeholders and wider issues analysis 50 a range of relevant stakeholders and issues are discussed. indicative issues include environmental sustainability, ethics, leadership, culture, the global environment, and making workplaces fit for humans. 2- responding to create competitive advantage 40 an analysis is done of how responding to these expectations and issue create competitive advantage for a business? presentation: presentation supports understanding of the report. 5 how well does the presentation of the report support understanding of the report by a reader (e.g. a busy manager or ceo). indicative aspects to consider could include: physical appearance, length, writing style, grammar, spelling and punctuation, referencing, use of figures, headings and summaries, use of appendices. strategic management assessment 2 - critical review - term 3 2018 auckland international campus bachelor of applied management graduate diploma in applied management cx770020 strategic management assessment 2 individual critical review and planning study block 3: 2018 due: week 6, day 1 weighting: 15% type: individual assessment report length: 1,000 – 2,000 words submit: electronically (no hard copy) to the moodle site for this paper. important note: you must achieve a combined minimum of 40% for the individual reports (assessment 1: part b and assessment 2). in other words 40% minimum across assessment 1b and assessment 2. auckland international campus cx770020 strategic management page | 2 objectives this assessment is designed to allow you to demonstrate your understanding of the concepts, tools, and techniques fundamental to strategic management. you will critically consider how the concepts, tools, techniques and the overall approach to strategic management could be adjusted to take into account stakeholder’s needs and related issues. learning outcomes 1. think critically regarding the application of relevant concepts, tools, and techniques of strategy instructions – all assessments see in report 1 instructions. assessment 2 instructions (individual) you are expected to write an individual report that demonstrates critical reflection around the following: you are required to: 1. reflect on the analysis done in assessment 1. did this adequately consider the needs of stakeholder and wider issues? what could make it more responsive to these needs and issues? refer to your analysis done on 1a above. 2. given your stakeholder analysis, state (1) what the key determinants of competitive advantage would be, and (2) how you would formulate a strategy in report 3, for instance its structure, and what tools, concepts, approaches etc. could be used in this formulation. report structure your report could have the following structure: title page (includes title of the proposal, name of the person the report is for, date submitted) table of contents introduction reflecting and planning o report 1 reflection needs of stakeholders and wider issues being more responsive to these needs and issues o report 3 reflective planning – stakeholder focused key determinants of competitive advantage strategy to improve competitive advantage conclusion note that you must use appropriate referencing (in text and a reference list). referencing the source of concepts, tools and techniques is an important aspect to enhance the credibility of your evaluation. auckland international campus cx770020 strategic management page | 3 word count the word count excludes your reference list and appendix. plagiarism plagiarism is a form of academic dishonesty. cases of dishonesty are regarded as serious by otago polytechnic. see the course outline and opaic policies about this. minimum achievement requirement you must achieve a combined minimum of 40% for the individual reports (assessment 1: part b and assessment 2). for a mark below 40% the lecturer will reduce the marks for all other assessments (assessment 1: part a, and assessment 3) to the same level, unless compelling evidence exists of the student’s contribution to these assessments. for a mark between 40% and 50% the lecturer may also reduce the marks for all other assessments (assessment 1:part a, and assessment 3) to the same level. the lecturer may make a determination about this adjustment based on the individual’s contribution to group work in class, attendance and other factors indicating individual effort and contribution. the lecturer could also assign additional work, or a resubmission of all or selected parts of the assignment. however, such determination will be the exception, and is at the discretion of the lecturer. see in the course outline how these evaluations will be done by the lecturer (see heading “determining whether a student contributed to group work, and whether their individual marks should be adjusted”). the peer reviews will also affect this determination. note that the preference is always to make no changes, and this intervention is to ensure that any freeloading or free rider behaviour is prevented, or that exceptional performance is rewarded more. it is not intended to make small changes based on minimal differences between group members. submission the reports for assessment 1: part b, and assessment 2 will be submitted as one combined report on moodle. this is done to simplify the submission process of these individual reports for students. auckland international campus cx770020 strategic management page | 4 marking rubric – individual report p e rf e c t e x c e lle n t v e ry g o o d g o o d a b o v e a v e ra g e a v e ra g e exclude="" quotes="" of="" f="" exclude="" bibliography="" of="" f="" exclude="" matches="" of="" f="" student="" paper="" submitted="" to="" bryan="" college="" student="" paper="" submitted="" to="" turun="" yliopisto="" student="" paper="" www.oecd.org="" internet="" source="" enrico="" bonetti.="" "the="" effectiveness="" of="" meta‐="" brands="" in="" the="" typical="" product="" industry:="" mozzarella="" cheese",="" british="" food="" journal,="" 2004="" publicat="" ion="" submitted="" to="" british="" school="" of="" commerce="" -="" colombo="" student="" paper="" sm="" -="" assessment="" 1_trade="" me="" analysis="" by="" diogo="" cris="" de="" lara="" sm="" -="" assessment="" 1_trade="" me="" analysis="" originality="" report="" primary="" sources="" auckland="" international="" campus="" cx770020="" strategic="" management="" page="" |="" 6="" assessment="" 1:="" part="" b="" instructions="" (individual)="" write="" an="" individual="" report="" that="" demonstrates="" critical="" reflection="" around="" the="" following:="" stakeholders="" and="" wider="" issues="" 1.="" consider="" the="" expectations="" of="" stakeholders="" by="" discussing="" a="" wide="" range="" of="" relevant="" issues,="" such="" as="" environmental="" sustainability,="" ethics,="" leadership,="" culture,="" the="" global="" environment,="" and="" making="" workplaces="" fit="" for="" humans.="" 2.="" how="" could="" responding="" to="" these="" expectations="" and="" issues,="" to="" create="" competitive="" advantage="" for="" a="" business?="" report="" structure="" your="" report="" could="" have="" the="" following="" structure:="" ="" title="" page="" (includes="" title="" of="" the="" proposal,="" name="" of="" the="" person="" the="" report="" is="" for,="" date="" submitted)="" ="" table="" of="" contents="" ="" introduction="" ="" stakeholders="" and="" wider="" issue="" o="" stakeholders="" expectation="" and="" wider="" issues="" o="" responding="" to="" create="" competitive="" advantage="" ="" conclusion="" note="" that="" you="" must="" use="" appropriate="" referencing="" (in="" text="" and="" a="" reference="" list).="" referencing="" the="" source="" of="" concepts,="" tools="" and="" techniques="" is="" an="" important="" aspect="" to="" enhance="" the="" credibility="" of="" your="" evaluation.="" word="" count="" the="" word="" count="" excludes="" your="" reference="" list="" and="" appendix.="" plagiarism="" plagiarism="" is="" a="" form="" of="" academic="" dishonesty.="" cases="" of="" dishonesty="" are="" regarded="" as="" serious="" by="" otago="" polytechnic.="" see="" the="" course="" outline="" and="" opaic="" policies="" about="" this.="" minimum="" achievement="" requirement="" you="" must="" achieve="" a="" combined="" minimum="" of="" 40%="" for="" the="" individual="" reports="" (assessment="" 1:="" part="" b="" and="" assessment="" 2)="" for="" a="" mark="" below="" 40%="" the="" lecturer="" will="" reduce="" the="" marks="" for="" all="" other="" assessments="" (assessment="" 1:="" part="" a,="" and="" assessment="" 3)="" to="" the="" same="" level,="" unless="" compelling="" evidence="" exists="" of="" the="" student’s="" contribution="" to="" these="" assessments.="" for="" a="" mark="" between="" 40%="" and="" 50%="" the="" lecturer="" may="" also="" reduce="" the="" marks="" for="" all="" other="" assessments="" (assessment="" 1:part="" a,="" and="" assessment="" 3)="" to="" the="" same="" level.="" the="" lecturer="" may="" make="" a="" determination="" about="" this="" adjustment="" based="" on="" the="" individual’s="" contribution="" to="" group="" work="" in="" class,="" attendance="" and="" other="" factors="" indicating="" individual="" effort="" and="" contribution.="" the="" lecturer="" could="" also="" assign="" additional="" work,="" or="" a="" resubmission="" of="" all="" or="" selected="" parts="" of="" the="" assignment.="" however,="" such="" determination="" will="" be="" the="" exception,="" and="" is="" at="" the="" discretion="" of="" the="" lecturer.="" auckland="" international="" campus="" cx770020="" strategic="" management="" page="" |="" 7="" submission="" the="" reports="" for="" assessment="" 1:="" part="" b,="" and="" assessment="" 2="" will="" be="" submitted="" as="" one="" combined="" report="" on="" moodle.="" this="" is="" done="" to="" simplify="" the="" submission="" process="" of="" these="" individual="" reports="" for="" students.="" marking="" rubric="" –="" individual="" report="" p="" e="" rf="" e="" c="" t="" e="" x="" c="" e="" lle="" n="" t="" v="" e="" ry="" g="" o="" o="" d="" g="" o="" o="" d="" a="" b="" o="" v="" e="" a="" v="" e="" ra="" g="" e="" a="" v="" e="" ra="" g="" e="" b="" e="" lo="" w="" a="" v="" e="" ra="" g="" e="" in="" a="" d="" e="" q="" u="" a="" te="" p="" o="" o="" r="" v="" e="" ry="" p="" o="" o="" r="" %="" 100="" 90="" 80="" 70="" 60="" 50="" 40="" 30="" 20="" 10="" percentages="" are="" indicative="" introduction:="" purpose="" of="" the="" report,="" key="" focus="" of="" this="" report,="" brief="" description="" of="" the="" organisation.="" 5="" introduction="" judged="" by="" how="" well="" it="" prepares="" the="" reader="" for="" the="" content="" of="" the="" report.="" stakeholders="" and="" wider="" issues="" 1-="" stakeholders="" and="" wider="" issues="" analysis="" 50="" a="" range="" of="" relevant="" stakeholders="" and="" issues="" are="" discussed.="" indicative="" issues="" include="" environmental="" sustainability,="" ethics,="" leadership,="" culture,="" the="" global="" environment,="" and="" making="" workplaces="" fit="" for="" humans.="" 2-="" responding="" to="" create="" competitive="" advantage="" 40="" an="" analysis="" is="" done="" of="" how="" responding="" to="" these="" expectations="" and="" issue="" create="" competitive="" advantage="" for="" a="" business?="" presentation:="" presentation="" supports="" understanding="" of="" the="" report.="" 5="" how="" well="" does="" the="" presentation="" of="" the="" report="" support="" understanding="" of="" the="" report="" by="" a="" reader="" (e.g.="" a="" busy="" manager="" or="" ceo).="" indicative="" aspects="" to="" consider="" could="" include:="" physical="" appearance,="" length,="" writing="" style,="" grammar,="" spelling="" and="" punctuation,="" referencing,="" use="" of="" figures,="" headings="" and="" summaries,="" use="" of="" appendices.="" strategic="" management="" assessment="" 2="" -="" critical="" review="" -="" term="" 3="" 2018="" auckland="" international="" campus="" bachelor="" of="" applied="" management="" graduate="" diploma="" in="" applied="" management="" cx770020="" strategic="" management="" assessment="" 2="" individual="" critical="" review="" and="" planning="" study="" block="" 3:="" 2018="" due:="" week="" 6,="" day="" 1="" weighting:="" 15%="" type:="" individual="" assessment="" report="" length:="" 1,000="" –="" 2,000="" words="" submit:="" electronically="" (no="" hard="" copy)="" to="" the="" moodle="" site="" for="" this="" paper.="" important="" note:="" you="" must="" achieve="" a="" combined="" minimum="" of="" 40%="" for="" the="" individual="" reports="" (assessment="" 1:="" part="" b="" and="" assessment="" 2).="" in="" other="" words="" 40%="" minimum="" across="" assessment="" 1b="" and="" assessment="" 2.="" auckland="" international="" campus="" cx770020="" strategic="" management="" page="" |="" 2="" objectives="" this="" assessment="" is="" designed="" to="" allow="" you="" to="" demonstrate="" your="" understanding="" of="" the="" concepts,="" tools,="" and="" techniques="" fundamental="" to="" strategic="" management.="" you="" will="" critically="" consider="" how="" the="" concepts,="" tools,="" techniques="" and="" the="" overall="" approach="" to="" strategic="" management="" could="" be="" adjusted="" to="" take="" into="" account="" stakeholder’s="" needs="" and="" related="" issues.="" learning="" outcomes="" 1.="" think="" critically="" regarding="" the="" application="" of="" relevant="" concepts,="" tools,="" and="" techniques="" of="" strategy="" instructions="" –="" all="" assessments="" see="" in="" report="" 1="" instructions.="" assessment="" 2="" instructions="" (individual)="" you="" are="" expected="" to="" write="" an="" individual="" report="" that="" demonstrates="" critical="" reflection="" around="" the="" following:="" you="" are="" required="" to:="" 1.="" reflect="" on="" the="" analysis="" done="" in="" assessment="" 1.="" did="" this="" adequately="" consider="" the="" needs="" of="" stakeholder="" and="" wider="" issues?="" what="" could="" make="" it="" more="" responsive="" to="" these="" needs="" and="" issues?="" refer="" to="" your="" analysis="" done="" on="" 1a="" above.="" 2.="" given="" your="" stakeholder="" analysis,="" state="" (1)="" what="" the="" key="" determinants="" of="" competitive="" advantage="" would="" be,="" and="" (2)="" how="" you="" would="" formulate="" a="" strategy="" in="" report="" 3,="" for="" instance="" its="" structure,="" and="" what="" tools,="" concepts,="" approaches="" etc.="" could="" be="" used="" in="" this="" formulation.="" report="" structure="" your="" report="" could="" have="" the="" following="" structure:="" ="" title="" page="" (includes="" title="" of="" the="" proposal,="" name="" of="" the="" person="" the="" report="" is="" for,="" date="" submitted)="" ="" table="" of="" contents="" ="" introduction="" ="" reflecting="" and="" planning="" o="" report="" 1="" reflection="" ="" needs="" of="" stakeholders="" and="" wider="" issues="" ="" being="" more="" responsive="" to="" these="" needs="" and="" issues="" o="" report="" 3="" reflective="" planning="" –="" stakeholder="" focused="" ="" key="" determinants="" of="" competitive="" advantage="" ="" strategy="" to="" improve="" competitive="" advantage="" ="" conclusion="" note="" that="" you="" must="" use="" appropriate="" referencing="" (in="" text="" and="" a="" reference="" list).="" referencing="" the="" source="" of="" concepts,="" tools="" and="" techniques="" is="" an="" important="" aspect="" to="" enhance="" the="" credibility="" of="" your="" evaluation.="" auckland="" international="" campus="" cx770020="" strategic="" management="" page="" |="" 3="" word="" count="" the="" word="" count="" excludes="" your="" reference="" list="" and="" appendix.="" plagiarism="" plagiarism="" is="" a="" form="" of="" academic="" dishonesty.="" cases="" of="" dishonesty="" are="" regarded="" as="" serious="" by="" otago="" polytechnic.="" see="" the="" course="" outline="" and="" opaic="" policies="" about="" this.="" minimum="" achievement="" requirement="" you="" must="" achieve="" a="" combined="" minimum="" of="" 40%="" for="" the="" individual="" reports="" (assessment="" 1:="" part="" b="" and="" assessment="" 2).="" for="" a="" mark="" below="" 40%="" the="" lecturer="" will="" reduce="" the="" marks="" for="" all="" other="" assessments="" (assessment="" 1:="" part="" a,="" and="" assessment="" 3)="" to="" the="" same="" level,="" unless="" compelling="" evidence="" exists="" of="" the="" student’s="" contribution="" to="" these="" assessments.="" for="" a="" mark="" between="" 40%="" and="" 50%="" the="" lecturer="" may="" also="" reduce="" the="" marks="" for="" all="" other="" assessments="" (assessment="" 1:part="" a,="" and="" assessment="" 3)="" to="" the="" same="" level.="" the="" lecturer="" may="" make="" a="" determination="" about="" this="" adjustment="" based="" on="" the="" individual’s="" contribution="" to="" group="" work="" in="" class,="" attendance="" and="" other="" factors="" indicating="" individual="" effort="" and="" contribution.="" the="" lecturer="" could="" also="" assign="" additional="" work,="" or="" a="" resubmission="" of="" all="" or="" selected="" parts="" of="" the="" assignment.="" however,="" such="" determination="" will="" be="" the="" exception,="" and="" is="" at="" the="" discretion="" of="" the="" lecturer.="" see="" in="" the="" course="" outline="" how="" these="" evaluations="" will="" be="" done="" by="" the="" lecturer="" (see="" heading="" “determining="" whether="" a="" student="" contributed="" to="" group="" work,="" and="" whether="" their="" individual="" marks="" should="" be="" adjusted”).="" the="" peer="" reviews="" will="" also="" affect="" this="" determination.="" note="" that="" the="" preference="" is="" always="" to="" make="" no="" changes,="" and="" this="" intervention="" is="" to="" ensure="" that="" any="" freeloading="" or="" free="" rider="" behaviour="" is="" prevented,="" or="" that="" exceptional="" performance="" is="" rewarded="" more.="" it="" is="" not="" intended="" to="" make="" small="" changes="" based="" on="" minimal="" differences="" between="" group="" members.="" submission="" the="" reports="" for="" assessment="" 1:="" part="" b,="" and="" assessment="" 2="" will="" be="" submitted="" as="" one="" combined="" report="" on="" moodle.="" this="" is="" done="" to="" simplify="" the="" submission="" process="" of="" these="" individual="" reports="" for="" students.="" auckland="" international="" campus="" cx770020="" strategic="" management="" page="" |="" 4="" marking="" rubric="" –="" individual="" report="" p="" e="" rf="" e="" c="" t="" e="" x="" c="" e="" lle="" n="" t="" v="" e="" ry="" g="" o="" o="" d="" g="" o="" o="" d="" a="" b="" o="" v="" e="" a="" v="" e="" ra="" g="" e="" a="" v="" e="" ra="" g="">