Assessment1:Literature Review
Due date:
21April2019
Length:
2500 words
Value:
35%
Task
Choose one topic from the list of social research topics (provided in week one).
Read the topic carefully.Write a review of the relevant literature of no longer than2500words,which covers the following:
(i)Define the research topic and the key concepts in the topic. Write a review which presents relevantliterature (research, theory and commentary) about the topic, making sure you point out the gaps in the literature (i.e. what is missing? What is not known about this topic? What questions do you have about the topic after reading the literature?).
(ii)The review should critically examine the literature by looking at theconceptual development and interpretation of thetopic/problem area, andthe theoretical explanations authors have used to understand the topic.
(iii)Your review should also discuss aand assess any existing research about the topic (or related to the topic if there is none on the specific topic).What does this existing research tell you about the topic? What were the rsesults and methods used in the existing research?
(iv) Your review should conclude with a statement about what further research is needed on this topic.
A minimum of8separate sources should be used in the review.
Presentation
The Literature Review must be typed on a word processor.
Assessment Criteria
The assignment will be assessed according to the following criteria:(each criteria will be given equal weighting)
· Quality overview of the relevant literature
· Ability to show a high standard critical analysis
· Ability to outline the differences between authors arguments.
· Ability to integrate literature and to present it in a coherent and valuable format that argues for the importance of studying the problem/issue you have chosen to research
· Adherence to academic conventions of writing(e.g.referencing;writing style)
Research Topics 2019
(You need to pick one of these topics to use for both your literature review and your research proposal assessements)
·
Remember – you are not answering these questions.
· You are not actually doing the research.
· You are finding out what information already exists about the topic and what information still needs to be found out – what questions do we still have about the topic? (literature review).
· You are then designing a research project that would help you to answer one of the questions about the topic (the research proposal).
1. What are the main causes of anxiety OR depression in young people?
2. What do Australians think of the idea of a universal basic income?
3. How can we reduce racism in Australia (or another location)?
4. How can we reduce sexism in Australia (or another location) ?
5. What supports do carers need to help them in their caring roles?
6. How can rates of recidivism in youth detention OR adult detention be reduced?
7. Does having more police lower crime rates?
8. What are the experiences of asylum seekers in Australia (or another location)?
9. How successful is ‘acceptance commitment therapy (ACT)’ in improving mental health?
10. What is the impact of natural disaster on mental health?
Resources
Walter, M. (ed) 2013. Social Research Methods. 3rd Ed. Oxford University Press, South Melbourne.
You will need access to this text for some of the assessments.
An optional text, particularly for those interested in social care and social work research specifically is
Flynn, C. & MCDermott, F. 2016. Doing Research in Social Work and Social Care. Sage, Melbourne.
Wadsworth, Y. 2011. Do It Yourself Social Research (3rd Ed) Taylor & Francis.
(this is a particular favourite of mine and great for those brand new to research)
Bickman, L. & Rog, D. (2009) The Sage Handbook of Applied Social Research (2nd ed)
Rubric
Rubric Detail
A rubric lists marking criteria that lecturers use to evaluate student work. Your lecturer linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. SelectGrid VieworList Viewto change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name:Assignment !
Description:Assignment 1
|
Poor |
Competent |
good |
very good |
excellent |
---|
Quality overview of relevant literature |
Points Range:0(0.00%)- 3.43(9.80%) |
Points Range:3.5(10.00%)- 4.48(12.80%) |
Points Range:4.55(13.00%)- 5.18(14.80%) |
Points Range:5.25(15.00%)- 5.88(16.80%) |
Points Range:5.95(17.00%)- 7(20.00%) |
---|
•Ability to show a high standard critical analysis |
Points Range:0(0.00%)- 3.43(9.80%) |
Points Range:3.5(10.00%)- 4.48(12.80%) |
Points Range:4.55(13.00%)- 5.18(14.80%) |
Points Range:5.25(15.00%)- 5.88(16.80%) |
Points Range:5.95(17.00%)- 7(20.00%) |
---|
•Ability to outline the differences between authors arguments. |
Points Range:0(0.00%)- 3.43(9.80%) |
Points Range:3.5(10.00%)- 4.48(12.80%) |
Points Range:4.55(13.00%)- 5.18(14.80%) |
Points Range:5.25(15.00%)- 5.88(16.80%) |
Points Range:5.95(17.00%)- 7(20.00%) |
---|
•Ability to integrate literature and to present it in a coherent and valuable format that argues for the importance of studying the problem/issue you have chosen to research |
Points Range:0(0.00%)- 3.43(9.80%) |
Points Range:3.5(10.00%)- 4.48(12.80%) |
Points Range:4.55(13.00%)- 5.18(14.80%) |
Points Range:5.25(15.00%)- 5.88(16.80%) |
Points Range:5.95(17.00%)- 7(20.00%) |
---|
•Adherence to academic conventions of writing (e.g. referencing; writing style) |
Points Range:0(0.00%)- 3.43(9.80%) |
Points Range:3.5(10.00%)- 4.48(12.80%) |
Points Range:4.55(13.00%)- 5.18(14.80%) |
Points Range:5.25(15.00%)- 5.88(16.80%) |
Points Range:5.95(17.00%)- 7(20.00%) |
---|
Name:Assignment !
Description:Assignment 1