Assessment Task 4 Details: This assessment aims to test your knowledge gained over the length of this unit. It will be an open book assessment consisting of a series of short answer questions (Part A)...

1 answer below »
Assessment Task 4 Details: This assessment aims to test your knowledge gained over the length of this unit. It will be an open book assessment consisting of a series of short answer questions (Part A) and responses to a real-world scenario (Part B). Part A will test your knowledge and Part B will ask you to apply this knowledge. It is recommended you review the course material, your notes and the assessment rubric in advance. Please reference appropriately where necessary. A word estimate has been provided next to each question. This is provided as a guide, you will not be penalised for being under or over this word limit but please remain concise and do not go vastly outside of the word guide. Please download the assessment template from iLearn, populate the document with your responses and upload the document to the TurnitIn DropBox in iLearn by the due date and time. Part A: Short Answer Questions (11 marks) 1. Explain the difference between leadership and management (word estimate: 150-200 words) 2. Explain why public health advocacy is important (word estimate: 200 words) 3. Explain the difference between lobbying and advocacy (word estimate: 100 words) 4. Explain three reasons why evaluation of an advocacy strategy is important (word estimate: 150-200 words) 2 Part B: Real-World Scenario (24 marks) What to do: Read the following real-world scenario and answer questions five to to nine. Read all of the questions before you begin writing. Scenario: Having completed your Master of Public Health, you secure your first job at the McCusker Centre for Action on Alcohol and Youth. Not long after starting in your new role, evidence from your organisation has come to light that supports the removal of alcohol advertising appearing on television during live Australian sporting events. You have not had experience working on this issue and are unaware of what strategies have been carried out in the past in Australia and internationally. You have been assigned to work on this issue along with two other colleagues and you are also working on other projects as are they. The cultural and professional backgrounds as well as the skillset you and your colleagues have is diverse. The budget you have for work in this area is small. 5. What initial steps might you undertake to embark on this project? Consider that you are working as part of a team? (word estimate: 300 words) 6. Given the diversity within your team, how might this impact team dynamics and work outcomes? (word estimate: 300 words) 7. Your supervisor asks you to provide a plan of action for taking this issue forward. You do not need to come up with an advocacy strategy, rather, you are asked to identify the key elements of an action plan taking into consideration the topic area. (word estimate: 350 words) 8. One of the recommendations from the evidence is to ‘phase out alcohol sponsorship of sport that exposes young people to alcohol promotion’. Outline and briefly explain three individual strategies that you could implement in taking the issue forward that are feasible given the scenario outlined. Provide the reasoning for your choice of strategy. (word estimate: 350-400 words) 9. What challenges do you envisage coming up against based on the information in the above scenario? (word estimate 300-350 words) 3 Assessment Rubric: Score Criteria High Distinction Responses: - demonstrate comprehensive knowledge of the assigned tasks - are clearly and concisely stated - demonstrate appropriate language usage and style of writing for the target audience - show an outstanding knowledge of the mechanisms of public health advocacy - demonstrate exceptional analysis of leadership theory - show exceptional application of innovative thinking to face real-world challenges in public health - show outstanding synthesis of ideas presented which are well supported by appropriately referenced evidence where applicable Distinction Responses: - demonstrate appropriate knowledge of the assigned tasks - are clearly and concisely stated - demonstrate mostly appropriate language usage and style of writing for the target audience - show a very good understanding of the mechanisms of public health advocacy - demonstrate a very good analysis of leadership theory - show good application of innovative thinking to face real-world challenges in public health - show substantial synthesis of ideas presented which are well supported by appropriately referenced evidence where applicable Credit Responses: - demonstrate good knowledge of the assigned tasks - are mostly clearly and concisely stated - shows good knowledge of the mechanisms of public health advocacy - demonstrates a good of leadership theory - show some application of innovative thinking to face real-world challenges in public health - show sufficient synthesis of ideas presented which are mostly supported by appropriately referenced evidence where applicable Pass Responses: - demonstrate limited knowledge of the assigned tasks - are not always clearly and / or concisely stated - language use is not always appropriate for the target audience - show a satisfactory knowledge of the mechanisms of public health advocacy - demonstrate an acceptable analysis of leadership theory - show some application of innovative thinking to face real-world challenges in public health - show little synthesis of ideas presented and only some supporting evidence is provided Fail Responses: - show minimal knowledge of the assigned tasks - are not always clearly and or concisely stated - language use is not appropriate for the target audience 4 - show little to no understanding of the mechanisms of public health advocacy - demonstrate a minimal analysis of leadership theory - show poor application of innovative thinking to face real-world challenges in public health - show no synthesis of ideas presented and no or inappropriate supporting evidence is provided
Answered Same DayOct 19, 2021HSYP807Macquaire University

Answer To: Assessment Task 4 Details: This assessment aims to test your knowledge gained over the length of...

Rimsha answered on Oct 29 2021
138 Votes
Running Head: INNOVATION IN LEADERSHIP, TEAMWORK & ADVOCACY    1
INNOVATION IN LEADERSHIP, TEAMWORK & ADVOCACY    2
HSYP807 INNOVATION IN LEADERSHIP, TEAMWORK & ADVOCACY
Open Book Assessment
Table of Contents
Part A    3
1.    3
2.    3
3.    4
4.    4
Part B    5
5.    5
6.    6
7.    6
8.    7
9.    8
References    10
Part A
1.
    As mentioned by Northouse (2018), leadership can be defined as the setting up of new vision or d
irection for the team to follow. The leader of the group motivates the people to follow the direction. On the contrary, as suggested by Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart and Wright (2017), management can be defined as the controlling or directing people or resources in a team as per the values or principles that have established. Leadership focuses on inspiring the team to complete the task successfully.
Leader motivates their team by setting up their own example and developing power with the help of people. On the other hand, management focuses on planning the task and directing people to complete the task on time. It includes allocation of resources to the people. Managers exercise their power on people to complete the task. Apart from this, leaders praise the success of the people; on the contrary, managers try to manage works for their own success.
2.
    As suggested by Murdaugh, Parsons and Pender (2018), public health advocacy can be defined as a phenomenon, in which focus is made on educating, organising and mobilising for systems change in population health. Public health advocacy involves promotion of health activities to overcome the barriers, which come in public health and occupational health. Public health advocacy identifies the threat to the health of the community. It plays crucial role in informing, creating and influencing legislation.
Public health advocates work in direction of creating environment, in which optimal health can be given to the people. Public health advocacy occurs through involvement of media, legislation and grassroot efforts. As suggested by Nash, Fabius, Skoufalos and Clarke (2015), public health advocacy acts as a core discipline of the public health, which emphasises on enhancing the health of community by work actively in improving the public health policy.
Public health advocacy work to reduce or eliminate social, health and economic inequalities, which act as barrier in improving the quality of life of the population. Public health advocates make influence on the politics so that all the health frameworks developed within the context able to achieve the desired outcome. Public health advocacy is the biggest supporter of public health and it is a necessary for the upliftment of the health of vulnerable group of population.
3.
    As mentioned by Kousta (2017), advocacy can be defined as the process of identifying, embracing and promoting the cause. In advocacy, advocates work to bring the change on some aspect of the society. They use the idea to argue in favour of the cause. They make appeal to bring the change. For example, appealing individual to change the behavior or appealing organisation to make the better workplace environment. On the contrary, as suggested by Chen, Parsley and Yang (2015), lobbying can be defined as the form of advocacy that attempt to influence legislation. It is an attempt to influence politician in the issues.
4.
    Evaluation of advocacy strategy is very necessary. As noted by Austin and Pinkleton, (2015), evaluation of the advocacy strategy allowed the individual to identify the quality of the strategy. It is also helpful in analysing the expected outcome of the strategy. Apart from this, evaluation allows the advocate to understand the impact of the strategy on the legislation. Evaluation make the advocates ask some important questions, which are necessary to make the improvement in the strategy or to modify the strategy so that it can cover vast issues or other vulnerable groups affected from the issues.
    Evaluation of the advocacy strategy allows the individual to understand the areas where strategy is successful...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here