Assessment Task 3 Details and Instructions Students will answer four short essay questions on general design, methodology, and where applicable, ethical and cultural issues. For this assignment, you...

1 answer below »

Assessment Task 3 Details and Instructions


Students will answer four short essay questions on general design, methodology, and where applicable, ethical and cultural issues.


For this assignment, you are required to answer four short essay questions on general design and methodological issues. Under no circumstances should any single answer be more than 500 words long (approximately one standard A4 page), and you must provide a word count at the end of each answer. Some questions may require a longer answer than others, and don’t feel as though you have to write 500 words for each answer—that is theabsolute maximum. Please answer the questions in full text form rather than by using bullet points and other summarising methods. All reference material must be cited and referenced in correct APA style. Feel free to cite websites, but if you do so, reference and cite them correctly.



The FOUR essay questions are:


1. “The scientific method provides the best way to answer questions, explain causal relationships in nature, and test the effectiveness of treatments.” Do you agree with this statement? Take a position on this question. In answering this question, make sure to contrast the scientific approach with one of the non-scientific methods of knowledge acquisition that were discussed in lectures, perhaps in the context of a real or hypothetical research question.



2. “What is the best design for an intervention study, and why?” Describe a hypothetical intervention study and outline how you would design such a study. Make sure that you describe all the essential features of the design that you choose.



3. “Why are reliability and validity such important principles in psychological measurement?” Make sure you clearly define both terms in your answer. In answering this question, consider a scenario where an important decision is made about a person on the basis of a psychological test. Why would reliability and validity be important in this situation, and what might be the consequence of using a test with poor psychometric properties?



4. Describe some of the main ethical issues in conducting research with Australian Indigenous populations and how such research can be conducted ethically and in a culturally responsive way.

Answered 2 days AfterJun 07, 2022

Answer To: Assessment Task 3 Details and Instructions Students will answer four short essay questions on...

Shubham answered on Jun 09 2022
94 Votes
Running Head: ACADEMIC WRITING                            1
ACADEMIC WRITING                                    5
ACADEMIC WRITING
Table of Contents
References    11
1.
Yes, I agree with the statement that “The scientific method provides the best way to answer questions, explain causal relationships in nature, and test the effectiveness of treatments.” The utilization of science as an objective vehicle to tackle issues, answer questions and to test and comprehend connections is an investigation
of the construction and conduct of the physical and natural means. As mentioned by Tshitoyan et.al, (2019) in order to respond to questions, it is used as an instrument and considered as a methodical way to deal with fabricated information through trial and error and perception, as well as form presumptions and get probability from derivation. It utilizes coherent thinking, to unbiasedly address responsible inquiries, which depend on hypothetical perspectives on the world.
Scientific approach is different from non-scientific approach because scientific methods can be repeatedly applied to a circumstance whereas non-scientific method is based on intution, personal experience or belief system. For instance, A hypothetical scenarion can be taken that ‘ Do nurses faced post traumatic disorder during pandemic?’. The answer is yes because they have faced the situation and the scientific research in this regard is also evident that looking after that trauma on a larger scale and dealing with patients it is possible. If it has been looked from non-scinetific perspective then the personal experiences are enough to push a person to tarumatic state after witnessing death every second in the hospitals. People loosing tha battle of life and whole families have been washed away due to its adverse impact empowered intution towards trauma. According to Newig, Jahn, Lang, Kahle and Bergmann, (2019) we as a whole notice the world in various ways, what is essentially seen asone individual's existence might be questioned by another, subsequently making it challenging for any conclusive outcomes to be accomplished. When the data collected from non-responders it was observed that the data represented whole nursing profession. An anonymous diagnostic test has been included in that to undertsand how nurses are combating stressful situations. These inquiries or requirements are either through our creative mind and encounters or through the craving to see something done about what is seen as a shamefulness on mankind all in all.
On the other hand the personal experiences shared by nurses on their blogs or during interviews helped in analysing the different side of the problem. Despite several trainings and counselling sessions the horror of witnessing tha trauma on live platform was more impactful. The method was insightful in covering the knowledge acquisition because there were lot more information on dealing with patients and their families on psychological front which cannot be covered in survey or questionnaire. It took a while to get over the disorder and back to normal because nursing profession is demanding and requires ethical conduct on stricter note to be accommodating with patient and their medical needs.
2.
Randomized controlled design is most strongest and commonly used interventional design for research study. the reason this method is mostly preferred due to fleibility of modifications in it (Hariton & Locascio, 2018). In the event of fruitful randomization, the two decided gatherings seems to be similar in all aspetcs with one another and both are estimated confounders and have unmeasured elements. Then the mediation is carried out in one of the gathering and while the correlations of mediation viability between the two gatherings are broke down. Hypothetically, the main contrast between the two gatherings were set through the whole review is called the process of intercession. Mediation is considered as the brillant model because with its help another medicine is used to treat a particular disease among a group of patients. This kind of randomization interaction is ostensibly the biggest implication of a RCT (27-29). Extra strategic components are used in RCTs to additionally foster the causal ramifications for the effect of intercession (Connolly, Keenan & Urbanska, 2018). These incorporate portion camouflage, estimating consistence, blinding and controlling for estimating dropout, co-mediations and examining results by goal tperspective o treat, and evaluating every treating arm simultaneously which points in a similar way.
The...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here