Criteria
|
High Distinction (HD)
|
Distinction (DI)
|
Credit (CR)
|
Pass (PS)
|
Fail (FL)
|
1. Identify and briefly describe the functional and non-functional requirements.
4 Marks
|
Functional requirements: all nine major business rules are identified and briefly described;
Non-functional requirements: seven possible system characteristics are identified and briefly described.
|
Functional requirements: seven major business rules are identified and briefly described;
Non-functional requirements: five possible system characteristics are identified and briefly described.
|
Functional requirements: five major business rules are identified and briefly described;
Non-functional requirements: four possible system characteristics are identified and briefly described.
|
Functional requirements: three major business rules are identified and briefly described;
Non-functional requirements: three possible system characteristics are identified and briefly described.
|
Identified functional and non-functional requirements are wrong and no or little description.
|
2. Identify use cases and draw use case diagrams
5 Marks
|
Major use cases are identified with accurate use case diagrams for the proposed system that show major use cases and actors.
|
Major use cases are identified with mostly accurate use case diagrams for proposed system that show major use cases and actors.
|
Some of the major use cases are identified with mostly accurate use case diagrams for proposed system that show some use cases and actors.
|
Few use cases are identified with use case diagrams for few proposed system that show few use cases and actors.
|
Use cases and use case diagrams are wrong.
|
3. Draw domain model class diagrams.
8 Marks
|
Domain model class diagrams are accurate for the proposed system; identified all possible domain classes and some attributes, showing logical relationships among all domain classes.
|
Domain model class diagram are mainly accurate for the proposed system; identified all possible domain classes and some attributes, showing logical relationships among all domain classes. Some omissions.
|
Domain model class diagrams are accurate for the proposed system; however, domain classes and their attributes are not always accurate, logical relationships have some errors among domain classes.
|
Domain model class diagrams are not always accurate for the proposed system; domain classes and their attributes are not always accurate, logical relationships have some errors among domain classes.
|
Domain model class diagrams have major omissions.
|
4. Develop an event-partitioned system model encompassing all the use cases you identified in question 2.
5 Marks
|
Event-partitioned system model is accurate for the proposed system; identified all possible processes, agents, and data entities, showing logical relationships among all items.
|
Event-partitioned system model is mostly accurate for the proposed system; identified most of processes, agents, and data entities, showing logical relationships among most of the items.
|
Event-partitioned system model is mostly accurate for the proposed system; identified most of the possible processes, agents, and data entities, showing logical relationships among all items. Some omissions.
|
Event-partitioned system models is not always accurate for the proposed system; identified only some processes, agents, and data entities, showing logical relationships among some items.
|
Event-partitioned system model is wrong.
|
Presentation and clarity (accuracy, spelling, grammar, punctuation, figures)
2 Marks
|
Fluent writing style appropriate to the assignment with accurate grammar and spelling, and high-quality figures drawn using some tools and figures have some captions.
|
Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assignment with accurate grammar and spelling, and good-quality figures drawn using some tools and figures have some captions.
|
Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to the assignment with mostly accurate grammar and spelling. Minor omissions only. Some-quality figures drawn using some tools and figures have some captions.
|
Writing style not always fluent or well organised and grammar and spelling contain errors. Poor-quality figures drawn using some tools and figures have some captions.
|
Writing style not fluent or well-organised, and many grammatical and spelling mistakes. Very bad quality figures, copied from others work, no captions.
|
Referencing and Citation
1 Marks
|
Referencing is mainly accurate and according to the APA standard. All references are cited in the text.
|
Referencing is mainly accurate and according to the APA standard. Most of the references are cited in the text.
|
Some attempt at referencing and according to the APA standard. Few references are cited in the text.
|
Attempt at referencing but not exactly according to APA standard and only few references are cited in the text.
|
Referencing is absent/ unsystematic.
|