Criteria*
|
HD – Outstanding Achievement 85% - 100%
|
DI - High Achievement 75% - 84%
|
CR - Above Satisfactory Achievement 65% - 74%
|
PS - Satisfactory Achievement 50% - 64%
|
FL - Unsatisfactory Achievement 0 - 49%
|
1.Identifies and discusses work of management thinker/researcher and expresses opinion on management ideas(200 words = 3)[meets subject LO2/4] |
Provides analytical identification and discussion of main argument, using well considered own words. |
Provides and justifies identification of main argument and discussion, using suitably selected own words. |
Provides satisfactory identification and discussion of main argument, in own words. |
Provides rudimentary identification and discussion of main argument mainly using own words. |
Provides poor identification and discussion of main argument, expressed poorly or not in own words. |
2.Identifies and discusses assumptions and limitations inherent in information about management (150 words = 2) [meets subject LO1] |
Provides analytical identification and discussion of assumptions and limitations, using well considered own words. |
Provides and justifies identification and discussion of assumptions and limitations, using suitably selected own words. |
Provides satisfactory identification of assumptions and limitations, and discussion in own words. |
Provides rudimentary identification and discussion of assumptions and limitations, using own words. |
Provides poor identification and discussion of assumptions and limitations, expressed poorly or not in own words. |
3.Identifies and discusses (using sources) research methodology and methods inherent in information about management (150 words = 2) [meets subject LO1]
|
Provides analytical identification and discussion of research methodology and methods, using well considered own words. |
Provides and justifies identification and discussion of research methodology and methods, using suitably selected own words. |
Provides satisfactory identification and discussion of research methodology and methods, in own words. |
Provides rudimentary identification and discussion of research methodology and methods, using own words. |
Provides poor identification and discussion of research methodology and methods,, expressed poorly or not in own words. |
4.Identifies and discusses findings and conclusions in research inherent in information about management (150 words = 2) [meets subject LO1] |
Provides analytical identification and discussion of main findings and/or conclusions, using well considered own words. |
Provides and justifies identification and discussion of main findings and/or conclusions, using suitably selected own words. |
Provides satisfactory identification and discussion of main findings and/or conclusions, in own words. |
Provides rudimentary identification and discussion of main findings and/or conclusions, mainly using own words. |
Provides poor identification and discussion of main findings and/or conclusions, expressed poorly or not in own words. |
5.Identifies and discusses main ideas in article relevant to MGT100 (200 words = 3) [meets subject LO2] |
Provides analytical identification and discussion of main ideas in article relevant to MGT100, using well considered own words. |
Provides and justifies identification and discussion of main ideas in article relevant to MGT100, using suitably selected own words. |
Provides satisfactory identification and discussion of main ideas in article relevant to MGT100, in own words. |
Provides rudimentary identification and discussion of main ideas in article relevant to MGT100, using own words. |
Provides poor identification and discussion of main ideas in article relevant to MGT100 expressed poorly or not in own words. |
6.Discusses practical applications for real life managers, their dilemmas or problems, and provides recommendations for action. (450 words = 6) [meets subject LO5] |
Provides analytical discussion, using well considered own words. |
Provides and justifies discussion, using suitably selected own words. |
Provides satisfactory discussion, in own words. |
Provides rudimentary discussion using own words. |
Provides poor discussion expressed poorly or not in own words. |
7.Indicates requisite APA6th citation and referencing skills.(Relevancy: direct relation to given article through title, current)(1 mark)
[meets subject LO1] |
2 highly relevant peer reviewed journal articles presented in perfect APA6th style. |
2 very relevant peer reviewed journal articles presented in near-perfect APA6th style. |
2 relevant peer reviewed journal articles presented in near-perfect of APA6th referencing style. |
2 potentially relevant peer reviewed journal articles presented in near-perfect APA6th referencing style. |
|
8.Indicates requisite quotation skills.([meets subject LO1] |
Perfect quotation and citation techniques. |
Very good quotation and citation techniques. |
Above satisfactory quotation and citation techniques. |
Satisfactory quotation and citation techniques. |
Unsatisfactory sentences and/or poor attempt at citation techniques. |
*Students must use the CSU American Psychological Association (APA6th) referencing style. Penalties may be applied for:10% over word limit / failure to cite sources / referencing errors / omissions / plagiarism (Plagiarism carries a large penalty see Handbook) |