Assessment item 1 back to top Understanding the Problem Value: 10% Due Date: 31-Mar-2019 Return Date: 23-Apr-2019 Submission method options: Alternative submission method Task back to top Background...

all attached


Assessment item 1 back to top Understanding the Problem Value: 10% Due Date: 31-Mar-2019 Return Date: 23-Apr-2019 Submission method options: Alternative submission method Task back to top Background NewAccess is a mental health intervention which initially targeted youth aged 17 to 25, and is in the process of being expanded to young people as young as 12, and also to Indigenous youth. Headspace is one of several organizations trialling this new system. NewAccess particularly targets depression and anxiety. One of the problems identified was that a young person with a mental illness might see multiple professionals before getting the help they need. Each time they need to re-tell their ‘story’. Soon the young people clam up and say very little, making it harder for professionals to help them. Initially, they might see a Headspace caseworker, then medical staff in a hospital emergency department, perhaps a General Practitioner, a psychologist, a psychiatrist, and others. Imagine that you are the analyst tasked with building a system that will capture the ‘story’ the first time it is told. This will give access to successive professionals, so that case notes and the story can become enriched, and the young person can be assisted more appropriately. Complete the Following You are a Systems Analyst that is part of a project that is being currently being proposed. Your task is to develop a Vision Document for this project. You are to describe the problem in your own words, and the capabilities and benefits. You need to create a Project Vision Document which contains: · Problem · Capabilities · Benefits Specific analysis techniques have not been taught yet, so this assignment does not require technical descriptions. Rationale back to top This assessment task will assess the following learning outcome/s: · be able to describe the context of an information system. · be able to distinguish between requirement gathering techniques and combine these appropriately to apply to a real scenario. · be able to evaluate development requirements and prepare a feasibility proposal based on multi-disciplinary (financial, human resource, technological) analyses. · be able to formulate and justify system requirement models based on evaluation of given situations. Marking criteria and standards back to top Criteria High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail 1. Content of the Vision Document Maximum 4 Marks Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of many of the deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having read beyond the core materials. Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However, literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Content acknowledged but not really taken into account. Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts. 2. Clarity of expression and presentation of response Maximum 3 Marks Highly developed skills in expression and presentation of response. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate. Well-organised. Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of response. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate. Good skills in expression and clear presentation of response. Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate. Some skills in expression and presentation of response. Meaning apparent but writing style not always fluent or well organised. Grammar and spelling contain errors. Significantly exceeded or fell short of the 3-page guide. Rudimentary skills in expression and presentation of response. Not all material is relevant and/or is presented in a disorganised manner. Meaning apparent but writing style not fluent or well-organised, Grammar and spelling contain errors. Ignored length requirements completely. 3.Referencing and Citation Maximum 3 Marks Referencing is consistently accurate and according to the APA standard. All references are cited in the text. At least 5 references provided. Referencing is mainly accurate and according to the APA standard. Most of the references are cited in the text. At least 4 references provided. Some attempt at referencing and according to the APA standard. Few references are cited in the text. At least 3 references provided. Attempt at referencing but not exactly according to APA standard and only few references are cited in the text. At least 2 references provided. Referencing is absent/unsystematic. Presentation back to top Your answer should be a report approx. 3 pages, Times Roman size 12 (title page and references are not part of the page count). You should use your own words and avoid lengthy quotations. Requirements back to top For this assessment you are required to use APA referencing to acknowledge the sources that you have used in preparing your assessment. Please refer to the CSU referencing guide http://student.csu.edu.au/study/referencing-at-csu. In addition a very useful tool for you to use that demonstrates how to correctly use in text referencing and the correct way to cite the reference in your reference list can be found at https://apps.csu.edu.au/reftool/apa-6