Analysis of the ethical issue using the ACS Code of Professional Conduct
(Value 70%)
|
Correctly maps the ethical issue within the video to the correct sections of the Code (including section numbers).
Comprehensively analyses the ethical issue from the point of view of the Code.
Makes a convincing and a justifiable recommendation
Demonstrates breadth & depth of understanding & has insights & awareness of the deeper, more subtle aspects of the Code.
|
Adequately maps the ethical issue within the video to the correct sections of the Code (including section numbers).
The analysis properly explains the link between the ethical issue and the elements of the Code.
The recommendation made is reasonable and is supported with a justification
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the Code.
|
Makes a genuine attempt at mapping the ethical issue within the video to the correct sections of the Code (including section numbers).
The analysis explains to some extent the link between the ethical issue and the elements of the Code.
The recommendation made makes sense and a good attempt is made to support it with a justification
Demonstrates a good understanding of the Code.
|
The ethical issue is mapped to the correct sections of the Code (including section numbers) but with errors.
The analysis does not explain well the link between the ethical issue and the elements of the Code.
The recommendation made makes sense but is not supported with a justification
Demonstrates some evidence of understanding of the Code.
|
Incorrectly maps the ethical issue within the video to sections of the Code.
The analysis of the ethical issue is not consistent with the elements of the Code.
The recommendation made makes no sense
Demonstrates little evidence of understanding of the Code.
|
Writing & structure
(Value 20%)
|
Highly developed skills in expression & presentation of ideas.
Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type.
Grammar & spelling accurate.
|
Well developed skills in expression & presentation of ideas.
Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type.
Grammar & spelling accurate.
|
Good skills in expression & clear presentation of ideas.
Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type.
Grammar & spelling contains a few minor errors.
|
Some skills in expression & presentation of ideas.
Meaning apparent, but writing style not always fluent or well organised.
Grammar & spelling contains several careless errors.
|
Rudimentary skills in expression & presentation of ideas.
Not all material is relevant &/or is presented in a disorganised manner.
Meaning apparent, but writing style not fluent or well organised.
Grammar & spelling contains many errors.
|
Referencing
(Value 10%)
|
Faultless referencing, including reference list and citations.
High quality references.
|
Very good referencing, including reference list and citations.
High quality references.
|
Good referencing, including reference list and citations.
Good quality references.
|
Evidence of rudimentary referencing skills.
Mix of good and poor quality references.
|
Sub-standard (or no) referencing.
Poor quality (or no) references.
|