Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Unit Code BN321 Unit Title Advanced Network Design Assessment Type Individual Assessment – T XXXXXXXXXXAssignment 1) Assessment Title Local Area Network...

Bn321


Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Unit Code BN321 Unit Title Advanced Network Design Assessment Type Individual Assessment – T1 2020 (Assignment 1) Assessment Title Local Area Network Design and Implementation Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping) This assignment is designed to assess students’ knowledge and skills related to the following learning outcomes: b. Analyse network design requirements c. Develop appropriate frameworks and standards for network implementation Weight Assignment 1a – 5% Assignment 1b - 15% Total Marks 75 Word limit 1000 - 1500 Due Date Assignment 1a- Week 3, Friday 6 pm, 3 April 2020 Assignment 1b- Week 8, Friday 6 pm, 8 May 2020 Submission Guidelines  All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date.  The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings.  Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style. Extension  If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly to the School's Administration Officer, in Melbourne on Level 6 or in Sydney on Level 7. You must submit this application three working days prior to the due date of the assignment. Further information is available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment Academic Misconduct  Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy- Procedure For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description. http://www.mit.edu.au/about http://www.mit.edu.au/about http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure Page 2 of 4 Assignment description You are a Graduate Network Engineer with an IT company named XYZ. You have been asked to develop a proposal for designing a new network for an ABC educational Institute that has recently been established in the city. The institute has five departments viz., Manager, Sales, Finance, Trainers and Front desk. You are supposed to come up with a network design suitable for this institute. It is to note that this assignment consists of two parts a) Assignment 1a and b) Assignment 1b. Assignment 1a The report should include the following contents: 1. Project Scope - The project scope and requirement should have an outline of the project. 2. Project Hardware and Software requirements - Name of the network device with manufacturer’s name, series, model and ports - Number and type of devices to be used - Type of the cables used - Name of the server, PC with specification such as operating system, RAM, hard disk etc. 3. Approach for the design - Discuss in clear terms the approach that you should be taking for designing the network. You may use bullet points whenever necessary. Assignment 1b 4. Feedback for assignment 1b - It is mandatory that students should demonstrate how they have incorporated the feedback given in assignment 1a. You may use a tabular form whenever necessary. 5. Detailed Network diagram - Include a diagram of your designed network, and write justifications of your design including the IP addressing solution 6. Network device configurations - Include most of the suitable feature which you have studied from laboratories 1 to 6. - Hint: Use of VLANs for different departments could be one of the preferences. Page 3 of 4 Marking criteria Section to be included in the report Description of the section Marks Part A Project Scope Outline of the report 5 Project Hardware and Software Requirements & their roles in establishing the network List all network devices, hardware and software requirements for the network design 10 Approach for the design Discuss in clear terms the approach that you should be taking for designing the network. You may use bullet points whenever necessary. 10 Part B Feedback from assignment 1a. Students should incorporate feedback from Assignment 1a. 10 Network Design & Layout of connectivity Include a diagram of your designed network, and write justifications of your design including the IP addressing solution 15 Network device configurations Configuration commands to configure network in order to access the internet, and to support VLAN for different groups Work progression check on week 5 and 6, at the lab in tutor’s continence. Note: Tutor may ask at max 4 questions for viva voce per student. Feedback will be provided. 10 10 Follow IEEE reference style 5 Total 75 Page 4 of 4 Marking Rubric Grade Mark HD 40-50 DI 35-39 CR 30-34 P 25-29 Fail<25 excellent very good good satisfactory unsatisfactory project scope /5 concise and specific to the project topics are relevant and soundly analysed. generally relevant and analysed. some relevance and briefly presented. this is not relevant to the assignment topic. project hardware and software requirements /10 demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but did not source reference material appropriately demonstrate d ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately demonstrated ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately did not demonstrate ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately approach for the design /10 explanation is clear and the logic is appropriate explanation is clear and the logic is mostly appropriate explanation is mostly clear and the logic is mostly appropriate explanation is mostly clear and the logic is not appropriate explanation is not clear and the logic is not appropriate feedback from assignment 1a /10 clear and concise mostly clear and concise mostly clear and mostly concise mostly clear and not concise not clear and not concise network design /15 logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments consistency logical and convincing mostly consistent logical and convincing adequate cohesion and conviction argument is confused and disjointed network device configurations /10 all elements are present and very well integrated. components present with good cohesive components present and mostly well integrated most components present proposal lacks structure. ieee reference style /5 clear styles with excellent source of references. clear referencing style generally good referencing style sometimes clear referencing style lacks consistency with many errors excellent="" very="" good="" good="" satisfactory="" unsatisfactory="" project="" scope="" 5="" concise="" and="" specific="" to="" the="" project="" topics="" are="" relevant="" and="" soundly="" analysed.="" generally="" relevant="" and="" analysed.="" some="" relevance="" and="" briefly="" presented.="" this="" is="" not="" relevant="" to="" the="" assignment="" topic.="" project="" hardware="" and="" software="" requirements="" 10="" demonstrated="" excellent="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" and="" sourced="" reference="" material="" appropriately="" demonstrated="" excellent="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" but="" did="" not="" source="" reference="" material="" appropriately="" demonstrate="" d="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" and="" sourced="" reference="" material="" appropriately="" demonstrated="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" and="" did="" not="" source="" reference="" material="" appropriately="" did="" not="" demonstrate="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" and="" did="" not="" source="" reference="" material="" appropriately="" approach="" for="" the="" design="" 10="" explanation="" is="" clear="" and="" the="" logic="" is="" appropriate="" explanation="" is="" clear="" and="" the="" logic="" is="" mostly="" appropriate="" explanation="" is="" mostly="" clear="" and="" the="" logic="" is="" mostly="" appropriate="" explanation="" is="" mostly="" clear="" and="" the="" logic="" is="" not="" appropriate="" explanation="" is="" not="" clear="" and="" the="" logic="" is="" not="" appropriate="" feedback="" from="" assignment="" 1a="" 10="" clear="" and="" concise="" mostly="" clear="" and="" concise="" mostly="" clear="" and="" mostly="" concise="" mostly="" clear="" and="" not="" concise="" not="" clear="" and="" not="" concise="" network="" design="" 15="" logic="" is="" clear="" and="" easy="" to="" follow="" with="" strong="" arguments="" consistency="" logical="" and="" convincing="" mostly="" consistent="" logical="" and="" convincing="" adequate="" cohesion="" and="" conviction="" argument="" is="" confused="" and="" disjointed="" network="" device="" configurations="" 10="" all="" elements="" are="" present="" and="" very="" well="" integrated.="" components="" present="" with="" good="" cohesive="" components="" present="" and="" mostly="" well="" integrated="" most="" components="" present="" proposal="" lacks="" structure.="" ieee="" reference="" style="" 5="" clear="" styles="" with="" excellent="" source="" of="" references.="" clear="" referencing="" style="" generally="" good="" referencing="" style="" sometimes="" clear="" referencing="" style="" lacks="" consistency="" with="" many="">