Assessment Details and Submission GuidelinesTrimesterTrimester 2, 2019Unit CodeMN506Unit TitleSystem ManagementAssessment TypeIndividual Assignment 1Assessment TitleSystem Management Tools for AdministrationPurpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping)The purpose of the assignment is to demonstrate your capabilities as System Admin. After successful completion of this assignment, students should be able to:1. Analyse and compare various server management systems2. Compare emerging tools and techniques for system managementWeight10%Total Marks50Word limit1000 – 1500 wordsDue DateWeek 7 (Friday 30 August 2019 by 23:55 PM)Submission Guidelines All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page. The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style.Extension If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly on AMS. You must submit this application three working days prior to the due date of the assignment. Further information is available at:http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/specialconsiderationdefermentAcademic Misconduct Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description.MN506 System Management Page 2 of 4Prepared by: Dr. Ajay Shiv Sharma Moderated by: Dr. Md Hasanul Ferdaus August 2019Assignment DescriptionYou have been provided a sample case study below:Case Study – Global Cure MartGlobal Cure Mart (GCM) is running successfully from last two decades. System Management covers all facets of IT administration at GCM and is one of the core issues that GCM faces in their day to day operations. Therefore, IT Manager of GCM stressed to you working as a System Admin, to have the right emerging tools to support and manage these daily operations. Currently, GCM is using open source monitoring tools like monit, cacti, openNMS, Icinga, etc. for system management in regards to different server services.As a System Admin, you are responsible to:1. Analyse and compare at least 3 existing server management systems at GCM, and2. Compare and contrast 3 emerging tools and techniques for system management at GCM.Assignment TaskAs a System Admin, you may make any assumptions you think are relevant and necessary.Prepare a report that includes the following sections explicitly:1) Executive summary that provides a brief summary of the report and the key findings that emerged from your analysis of prevalent 3 server management systems at GCM.2) Introduction about the case study.3) Compare at least 3 existing server management systems for administration at GCM.4) Compare and contrast 3 emerging tools and techniques for system management which can be incorporated in 2020.5) Your mindful conclusion should include summary of the report with concrete suggestions to IT Manager and its relevant justifications.Submission Guidelines:1. Your report should include the following:• The report should have a consistent, professional, and well-organised appearance. The word limit to create the report is 1000-1500 words.• The cover page must identify student’s (name and ID), teaching staff, and the assignment title.• Reference sources (IEEE style) must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list.2. The assignment must be submitted in electronic copy on Moodle submission link.Note: The students are advised to visit Centre of Learning for guidance in making professional reports.MN506 System Management Page 3 of 4Prepared by: Dr. Ajay Shiv Sharma Moderated by: Dr. Md Hasanul Ferdaus August 2019Please see marking guide for information on marking criteria.Marking CriteriaSectionDescriptionMarksExecutive summaryExecutive summary that provides a brief summary of the report and the key findings that emerged from your analysis of prevalent 3 server management systems at GCM.10IntroductionIntroduction that showcase how you intend to go about the analysis, comparison and conclusion of the case study5CompareCompare at least 3 existing server management systems for administration at GCM.10Compare and ContrastCompare and contrast 3 emerging tools and techniques for system management which can be incorporated in 2020.10ConclusionConclusion should include summary of the report with concrete suggestion/s to IT Manager and its relevant justification/s.5Reference and appendicesIn-text referencing & Reference list5Report formatReport layout, structure, grammar and formatting5Total Marks50MN506 System Management Page 4 of 4Prepared by: Dr. Ajay Shiv Sharma Moderated by: Dr. Md Hasanul Ferdaus August 2019Marking Rubric for Assignment 1: Total Marks 50Grade MarkHDDCRPFail80% and above70%-79%60%-69%50%-59%Less than 50%Executive SummaryComplete in all respects; reflects all requirementsComplete in most respects; reflects most requirementsIncomplete in many respects; Reflects few requirementsIncomplete inIncomplete/10most respects;does not reflectin allaspectsrequirementsIntroductionDemonstrates aDemonstrates an accomplished understanding of the case study and issuesDemonstrates anDemonstratesDoes not demonstrate understanding to the topics and issues./5sophisticatedunderstandingacceptableunderstanding ofan inadequateunderstandingof the casethe topic(s) andof the casestudy andissuesstudy andissuesissuesCompareDemonstratesDemonstratesDoes not/10Comparison of all 3 existing server management systems at GCMComparison of all 3 existing server management systems at GCMComparison of all 3 existing server management systems withoutInsufficient comparisonprovide comparisonwith all justificationsdemonstrationCompare and ContrastExcellentVery goodGoodSatisfactoryPoor/10insight into 3insight into 3insight into 3insight into 3insight into 3emerging tools andemerging tools andemerging tools andemerging tools andemerging tools &techniques fortechniques fortechniques fortechniques fortechniques forSystem ManagementSystemManagementSystem ManagementSystem ManagementSystem Managementwhich can bewhich can bewhich can bewhich can bewhich can beinducted at GCMinducted at GCMinducted at GCMinducted at GCMinducted at GCMin 2020in 2020in 2020in 2020in 2020ConclusionPresents anPresents aPresents aPresents anAnalysis/10insightful andthoroughthoroughanalysis ofsuperficialanalysis ofincompleteanalysis of thenot relatedto the caseanalysis of allmost issuessome of theissuesstudyissuesidentified;issuesidentifiedpresented.identified;includes mostidentified;includes allnecessaryomitsnecessaryInformation andnecessaryInformation andconcreteinformationconcretesuggestionSuggestion &justificationReference andUses IEEEUses IEEE guidelinesReflectsDoes not useNo ReferenceappendicesguidelinesincompleteIEEE guidelines/5accurately andknowledgeconsistently toof IEEEcite sourcesguidelinesReport formatWritingWriting isWriting lacksWriting isReport/5demonstrates aaccomplished inclarity orunfocused,unfocused,sophisticatedterms of clarityconcisenessrambling, orcontainsclarity,and concisenessand containscontainsgrammaticalconciseness, andand contains onlynumerousserious errors;and spellingcorrectness; includesa few errors;errors; giveslacks detailerrors.thorough details andincludes sufficientinsufficientand relevantVery hardrelevant data anddetails anddetail anddata andtoinformationrelevant data andrelevant datainformation;understand.extremely well-information;andpoorlyorganizedwell-organizedinformation;organized