Grade Mark
|
HD 40-50
|
DI 35-39
|
CR 30-34
|
P 25-29
|
Fail
|
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Satisfactory
|
Unsatisfactory
|
Project scope
|
Concise and specific to the project
|
Topics are relevant and soundly analysed.
|
Generally relevant and analysed.
|
Some relevance and briefly presented.
|
This is not relevant to the assignment topic.
|
Project hardware requirements
|
Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately
|
Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but did not source reference material appropriately
|
Demonstrated ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately
|
Demonstrated ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately
|
Did not demonstrate ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately
|
Network Design in Netsim
|
Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments
|
Consistency logical and convincing
|
Mostly consistent logical and convincing
|
Adequate cohesion and conviction
|
Argument is confused and disjointed
|
Network device configurations – Switch configuration
|
All elements are present and very well integrated.
|
Components present with good cohesive
|
Components present and mostly well integrated
|
Most components present
|
Proposal lacks structure.
|
Network device Configurations – Router configuration
|
All elements are present and very well integrated.
|
Components present with good cohesive
|
Components present and mostly well integrated
|
Most components present
|
Proposal lacks structure.
|
Demonstration
|
Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments
|
Consistency logical and convincing
|
Mostly consistent logical and convincing
|
Adequate cohesion and conviction
|
Argument is confused and disjointed
|
IEEE Reference style
|
Clear styles with excellent source of references.
|
Clear referencing style
|
Generally good Referencing style
|
Sometimes clear referencing style
|
Lacks consistency with many errors
|