ASSESSMENT BRIEF
|
Subject Code and Title
|
PUBH6006: Community Health and Disease Prevention
|
Assessment
|
Assessment 3: Plan - Emergency Response
|
Individual/Group
|
Individual
|
Length
|
1,500 words (+/- 10%)
|
Learning Outcomes
|
This assessment addresses the following learning outcomes:
Examine concept of health emergency preparedness and response
Analyse the health emergency plan in crisis situations.
Integrate health promotion theories and public health frameworks to into practice
Demonstrate clear and assertive communication across a range of settings and situations
|
Submission
|
Due: End of Module 6, Sunday of week 12 at 11:55pm*
|
Weighting
|
30%
|
Total Marks
|
100 marks
|
*Please Note: This time is Sydney time (AEST or AEDT).
Please convert to your own time zone (e.g. Adelaide = 11:25pm)
PUBH6006 Assessment 3 BriefΙDecember 2020 Page1of5
Instructions
Read the scenario of public health emergency provided by your lecturer and develop a report draw from your critical analysis and applying theory into practice.The scenario will be provided separately.
Use appropriate data and information to critically explain and analyse the given public health emergency.
Critical analysis an existing emergency response plan that have been implemented in the given scenario and identify the area that could be improved or changed.
Propose recommendations for improving the existing emergency response plan; or to developing future plan based on the given scenario. Discuss the potential stakeholders who should be involved in your recommended emergency response plan.
Please read the guidance on how to develop this assessment in the template.
It is compulsory to use the assessment template which is attached with the scenario of assessment 3.
Public Health Program
PUBH6006 Assessment 3 BriefΙDecember 2020 Page2of5
Assessment Criteria
Public Health Program
Criteria Mark
|
Critically explain and analyse the given public health emergency by using appropriate20%information and relevant data.
|
Critically analyse the existing emergency response plan and identify the area of35%improvement for public health practice in the scenario context.
|
Apply conceptual framework of emergency preparedness and response to improve the35%existing plan or to develop a future emergency response plan for the given situation.
|
Assessment fulfils general academic standards and general criteria.10%
Use assessment template
Provide an introduction and conclusion
Comply with academic standards of writing, including legibility, spelling, presentation
and grammar
Includes at least 10‐12 scholarly sources for this assessment.
Use appropriate APA 6thstyle for citing and referencing research
Uphold standards of academic integrity, as demonstrated by an acceptable report from text matching software (Safe Assign).
|
Format:
Use specific template for this assessment
Use headings as suggested in the template
Font style :Arial or Tahoma
Font size:10 for paragraph, 12 for headings
Font colour:Black
Space:1.5
DO NOTinclude running head, table of content, executive summary/abstract
Figures and tables
All figures and tables derived from other works must be presented with citation using APA 6thstyle
PUBH6006 Assessment 3 BriefΙDecember 2020 Page3of5
Marking Rubric
Public Health Program
Assessment Attributes
|
Fail (Unacceptable) 0-49%
|
Pass (Functional) 50-64%
|
Credit (Proficient) 65-74%
|
Distinction (Advanced) 75-84%
|
High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100%
|
Grade Description
(Grading Scheme)
|
Evidence of unsatisfactory achievement
|
Evidence of satisfactory achievement
|
Evidence of a good level of achievement
|
Evidence of a high level of achievement
|
Evidence of an exceptional level of achievement
|
Critically explain and analyse the given public health emergency by using appropriate information and relevant data
20%
|
The assessment does not demonstrate an ability to critically explain and analyse the given public health emergency by using appropriate information and relevant data
|
The assessment present limited ability to critically explain and analyse the given public health emergency.
This is overly descriptive and needs more supported evidence.
|
The assessment presents a critical explanation and analysis of the given public health emergency with appropriate information and relevant data.
The analysis is reasonably well explained and justified by credible evidence.
|
The assessment presents an excellent explanation and analysis of the given public health emergency with appropriate information and relevant data.
The analysis is very well explained and justified with credible evidence.
|
The assessment contains a highly sophisticated explanation and analysis of the given public health emergency with appropriate information and relevant data.
The analysis is expertly explained and well justified by relevant and high-quality evidence from credible sources.
|
Critically analyse the existing emergency response plan and identify the area of improvement for public health practice in the scenario context.
35%
|
The student does not demonstrate an ability to critically analyse the existing emergency response plan implemented in the scenario.
The area of improvement for public health practice is not identified.
|
The student demonstrates limited ability to critically analyse the existing emergency response plan implemented in the scenario.
The area of improvement for public health practice in the scenario context is not clearly identified.
This is overly descriptive and needs more supported evidence.
|
The student presents a good critical analysis of the existing emergency response plan implemented in the scenario.
The area of improvement for public health practice in the scenario context is clearly identified.
The analysis is reasonably well explained and justified by credible evidence.
|
The student presents an excellent critical analysis of the existing emergency response plan implemented in the scenario.
The area of improvement for public health practice in the scenario context is clearly identified.
The analysis is reasonably well explained and justified by credible evidence.
|
The student presents a highly sophisticated analysis of the existing emergency response plan implemented in the scenario.
The area of improvement for public health practice in the scenario context is clearly identified.
The analysis is expertly explained and well justified by relevant and high-quality evidence from credible sources
|
PUBH6006 Assessment 3 BriefΙDecember 2020
Page4of5
Marking Rubric(continued)
Public Health Program
Assessment Attributes
Grade Description
(Grading Scheme)
Fail (Unacceptable) 0-49%
Evidence of unsatisfactory achievement
Pass (Functional) 50-64%
Evidence of satisfactory achievement
Credit (Proficient) 65-74%
Evidence of a good level of achievement
Distinction (Advanced) 75-84%
Evidence of a high level of achievement
High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100%
Evidence of an exceptional level of achievement
The student does not demonstrate an ability to apply conceptual framework of emergency preparedness and response to improve the existing plan or to develop a future emergency response plan for the given situation.
The student demonstrates limited ability to apply conceptual framework of emergency preparedness and response to improve the existing plan or to develop a future emergency response plan for the given situation. The recommendation is overly descriptive and needs more supported evidence.
The student presents a good application of conceptual framework of emergency preparedness and response to improve the existing plan or to develop a future emergency response plan for the given situation. The recommendation is reasonably well explained and justified by credible evidence.
The student presents an excellent application of conceptual framework of emergency preparedness and response to improve the existing plan or to develop a future emergency response plan for the given situation. The recommendation is very well explained and justified with relevant and credible evidence
The student presents a highly sophisticated application of conceptual framework of emergency preparedness and response to improve the existing plan or to develop a future emergency response plan for the given situation.
The recommendation is expertly explained and well justified by relevant and high-quality evidence from credible sources
Apply conceptual
framework of emergency preparedness and response to improve the existing plan or to develop a future emergency response plan for the given situation.
35%
Assessment fulfils general academic standards and general criteria.
Using assessment template.
10%
Poorly written with errors in spelling, grammar. The assessment has no introduction or conclusion. Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas.
There are mistakes in using the APA style.
Written according to academic genre (i.e., introduction, main body, and conclusion).
Use assessment template. Demonstrates consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed.
There are some mistakes in using the APA style.
Well written and adheres to the academic genre (i.e., introduction, main body, and conclusion).
Use assessment template. Demonstrates consistent use of high quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas.
There are no mistakes in using the APA style.
Very well written and adheres to the academic genre.
Use assessment template. Consistently demonstrates expert use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop appropriate arguments and statements. Shows evidence of reading beyond the key reading.
There are no mistakes in using the APA style.
Expertly written and adheres to the academic genre.
Use assessment template. Demonstrates expert use of high‐quality and relevant research sources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows extensive evidence of reading beyond the key reading.
There are no mistakes in using the APA Style.
‐‐
PUBH6006 Assessment 3 BriefΙDecember 2020
Page5of5