This criterion is linked to a learning outcome
Introduction to self (video) - max 4 marksA 30-second recording of your professional introduction is uploaded to Padlet.
|
4
to >3.0
PtsFull marks - Excellent Clearly and professionally introduces self by name, includes key aspects (eg nursing student at the Uni of Canberra), and uses eye contact and facial expressions to engage the audience. The timeframe is adhered to.
|
3
to >2.0
PtsProficient Clearly introduces self by name, and includes key aspects of a professional introduction. May still be developing an aspect of confidence, articulation, or facial engagement. The time frame is adhered to.
|
2
to >1.0
PtsSufficient Clearly introduces self by name, and includes key aspects of a professional introduction. May still be developing confidence, articulation, or facial engagement. The time frame is not within 10% +/-
|
1
to >0.0
PtsDeveloping An introduction to self is not submitted, or an introduction is included of limited professionalism or poor verbal delivery. Timing is not adhered to.
|
0
PtsNo marks (NX) This element of the ePortfolio is missing.
|
|
4
pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome
200 words nursing philosophy (Word document) - max 8 marksA written summary of your nursing philosophy in 200 words (+/- 10%). (Max 8 marks)
|
8
to >7.5
PtsFull marks - Excellent Provides a reflective, thoughtful nursing philosophy that includes nursing theoretical frameworks in relation to a personal values-based and relational approach. Nursing theory or NMBA Codes and RN Standards for Practice are appropriately referenced.
|
7.5
to >6.0
PtsProficient Provides a considered and coherent nursing philosophy that reflects a personal approach.
|
6
to >4.0
PtsSufficient Describes a nursing philosophy in simple and general terms. The writing inconsistently reflects a personal approach.
|
4
to >0.0
PtsDeveloping The nursing philosophy is not included or does not meet a word count within 10% of the 200-word limit.
|
0
PtsNo marks (NX) This element of the ePortfolio is missing.
|
|
8
pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome
A recorded oral reflection using Gibb’s Reflective cycle on feedback from Assessment Three Developing a Nursing Persona essay. (Including rubric mark) – (Voice recording) max 8 marksA verbal reflection using Gibb's reflective approach on any feedback received (including rubric mark) from the Assessment Three essay, and how this will influence your future essay writing in your degree (3 minutes (+/- 10%). (Max 8 marks)
|
8
to >7.5
PtsFull marks - Excellent A confident and clearly articulated oral reflection on feedback provided on the Assessment Three essay is demonstrated. Gibb’s reflective cycle is neatly embedded, with each element of Gibb’s cycle structure apparent. The student articulately highlights what they will do differently in future study approaches and essay writing. The timeframe is adhered to.
|
7.5
to >6.0
PtsProficient Coherent and engaging delivery of reflection on feedback provided on Assessment three essay. The reflection demonstrates the structure of Gibb’s reflective cycle that is clearly embedded in the reflection. The student clearly highlights what they will do differently in future study approaches and essay writing. The timeframe is adhered to.
|
6
to >4.0
PtsSufficient The student outlines feedback on the Assessment Three essay and demonstrates a reflection using the structure of Gibb’s reflective cycle. The timeframe is not adhered to within 10% +/-.
|
4
to >0.0
PtsDeveloping There is no or minimal reflection, and the structure of Gibb’s reflective cycle is unclear. Timing is not adhered to.
|
0
PtsNo marks (NX) This element of the ePortfolio is missing.
|
|
8
pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome
A mind map connecting nursing professional regulatory components with Australian healthcare structures and systems (Word document)- max 8 marksA one (1) page mind map connecting nursing professional regulatory components with Australian healthcare structures and systems. A second page may be added for references formatted in the APA 7th edition style. (Max 8 marks)
|
8
to >7.5
PtsFull marks - Excellent The mind map illustrates persuasive connections between key elements of the Australian healthcare systems and structures. The mind map is supported by engagement with high-quality evidence presented as references using the APA 7th edition style formatting. The mind map links are presented in a way that demonstrates thoughtful, deliberate, and nuanced understanding.
|
7.5
to >6.0
PtsProficient The mind map is considered and coherently presented, and key components of the Australian healthcare structures and systems are clearly linked.
|
6
to >4.0
PtsSufficient The mind map is mostly coherently presented, components of the Australian healthcare structures and systems are included but links may not be clear.
|
4
to >0.0
PtsDeveloping The mind map is not present or not connected, or key components are not present.
|
0
PtsNo marks (NX) This element of the ePortfolio is missing.
|
|
8
pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome
Symbolic storytelling - using any media (writing, video, art) to express how the cultural and political paradigms in Australia have influenced you. Include reflection on how this may affect the development of your nursing persona. - max 4 marksSymbolic storytelling - using any media (writing, video, art, poetry, sculpture) to express how the cultural and political paradigms in Australia have influenced you. Include reflection (written, verbal or video) of how this may affect the development of your nursing persona. (Max 4 marks)
|
4
to >3.0
PtsFull marks - Excellent Presents a thoughtful, deliberate, and nuanced symbolic storytelling related to cultural and political concepts. Reflection on the development of a nursing persona is persuasive and engaging.
|
3
to >2.0
PtsProficient A symbolic story is presented, cultural and political concepts are outlined, and their impact on the development of a professional nursing identify is reflected upon. (eg 'this is the symbol I chose and why', and 'this is why is this important to the development of my nursing persona'.
|
2
to >1.0
PtsSufficient Cultural and political concepts are identified. Some reflective process is documented (eg 'This is the symbol I chose and why', and 'This is why is this important to the development of my nursing persona').
|
1
to >0.0
PtsDeveloping Symbolic storytelling is not submitted or lacks detail, reflection, or clarity.
|
0
PtsNo marks (NX) This element of the ePortfolio is missing.
|
|
4
pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome
A one (1) page Curriculum Vitae (resume) (following elements of the template provided but a personal document can be developed) (Word document)- max 4 marksA one (1) page Curriculum Vitae (resume) (following elements of the template provided but a personal document can be developed) (Word document)- max 4 marks
|
4
to >3.0
PtsFull marks - Excellent A Curriculum Vitae (resume) is included that is exceptionally well formatted and organised, with all key elements presented to their maximum impact.
|
3
to >2.0
PtsProficient A Curriculum Vitae (resume) is included that is well organised and carefully formatted all key elements are present.
|
2
to >1.0
PtsSufficient A Curriculum Vitae (resume) is provided the text is coherent, and key elements such as personal details, qualifications, and work experience are outlined.
|
1
to >0.0
PtsDeveloping A Curriculum Vitae (resume) is not included, lacks attention to detail or missing key elements.
|
0
PtsNo marks (NX) This element of the ePortfolio is missing.
|
|
4
pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome
Presentation of e-portfolio - max 4 marksPresentation of e-portfolio - max 4 marks
|
4
to >3.0
PtsFull marks - Excellent Persuasive presentation that indicates understanding and integration of the NMBA Codes of Conduct and the NMBA RN Standards for Practice (Standard 3- Maintains capability for practice).
|
3
to >2.0
PtsProficient Engaging and attractive presentation, that indicates insight into NMBA Codes of Conduct and the NMBA RN Standards for Practice (Standard 3- Maintains capability for practice). With no errors.
|
2
to >1.0
PtsSufficient Presented with attention to detail, and minimal spelling or editing errors.
|
1
to >0.0
PtsDeveloping The ePortfolio is poorly presented, written and structured. There is a lack of organisation. Poor editing or formatting.
|
0
PtsNo marks (NX) The presentation indicates a lack of understanding of the assessment task.
|
|
4
pts
|
Total points:
40
|