Assessment 3 Assessment Type: Case Study Assignment. Maximum word limit of 2,500 words Purpose: This assessment will allow students to demonstrate their understanding of auditing standards,...

1 answer below »



Assessment 3





Assessment Type: Case Study Assignment. Maximum word limit of 2,500 words





Purpose: This assessment will allow students to demonstrate their understanding of auditing standards, procedures and techniques, how they are applied in organisational situations and the implications for stakeholders. The group nature of this assessment will allow students to further develop their team working skills. This assessment contributes to learning outcomes a, b and c.




There are two questions in this assignment with separate unrelated parts in each question.



Topic: Audit Risk, Analysis and Control in organisations Question 1


J Audrey Pearce is an audit partner of Pearce Green, a firm of accountants. She is considering audit risk at the overall financial statement level in planning the audit for the finance company Homes South Ltd (HS) for the year ending 30 June 2020. This risk is influenced by a combination of factors related to management, the industry and the entity. Audrey has gathered the following information concerning HS’s environment:



1. HS has been consistently more profitable than the industry average by marketing mortgages on properties in a prosperous rural area which has experienced considerable growth in recent years. HS packages and sells mortgages to large investment trusts. Despite recent volatility of interest rates, HS has been able to continue selling its mortgages as a source of new lendable funds.




2. HS’s board of directors is controlled by George Watson, the majority shareholder, who also acts as the chief executive officer. Management at the company’s branch offices has authority for directing and controlling HS’s operations, and is compensated according to branch profitability. The internal auditor reports directly to Henry Stevenson, a minority shareholder, who is chairman of the audit committee.




3. The accounting department has experienced little turnover in personnel during the five years for which Audrey has audited HS. HS’s formula constantly underestimates the allowance for loan losses, but its financial controller has always been receptive to Audrey’s suggestions to increase the allowance.



4. During 2019, HS opened a branch office in a metropolitan area 30 kilometres from its principal place of business. Although this branch is not yet profitable (as a result of competition from several well- established banks), management believes it will be profitable by 2021.



5. During 2019, the company increased the efficiency of its operations by installing a new computer system.




Required: Based only on the information provided, indicate the factors that would affect the risk of material misstatement and explain why.





Question 2




Draft financial information for Darfield Electronics for the year to 30 June 2021 is as follows.
































































c




2021 Draft $000s




2020 Actual $000s



Revenue



5267



4122



Cost of Sales



(2519)



(2290)



Gross Profit



2748



1832



Operating Expenses



(1718)



(958)



Profit before interest and tax



1030



874



Cash



-



527



Trade Receivables



931



587



Inventory



481



366



Bank Overdraft



206



-



Trade Payables



366



275




Required: Analyse the information above, identify audit risks and outline how the auditor should respond to these risks.




Marking Guide: Research – extent and application 20%


Analysis of the organisation 30% Recommendations/conclusions 40%


Report presentation/referencing 10%


This mark will be scaled to a mark out of 20 subject marks.




As this is a group assessment, all group members will receive the same mark. Any groups experiencing unacceptable levels of contribution from any members should advise their tutor as early as possible so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Complaints in relation to matters relating to the above assessment made in Week 9 or later are unlikely to be able to be considered.









Rubric for ACC300 Auditing and Assurance


















































Criteria




Fail



(0 – 49%)




Pass (50 – 64%)




Credit (65 – 74%)




Distinction (75 – 84%)




High Distinction (85 – 100%)




Research – extent and application






Value 30% Mark awarded



Inaccurate, inappropriate or no use of literature. Analysis not developed.


No original explanations provided.



Minimum number of sources, not all current or relevant.


Paraphrasing used throughout but not always accompanied by original explanations.


Theory relevant but not always linked to analysis.



Good selection of theory from a range of sources to build and adequately justifies analysis.


Paraphrasing used throughout but accompanied by original explanations



Insightful and appropriate selection of theory from a good range of current and relevant sources to systematically build and justify analysis.


Minimum paraphrasing



Integration and originality in the selection and handling of relevant theory to build and justify analysis.


Wide range of current and relevant sources integrated in systematic way.




Analysis of the organisation






Value 30% Mark awarded



Poor evaluation.


Significant gaps in knowledge of the theory and lack of understanding of company’s capabilities.


No analysis provided. Disjointed or no discussion.



Simple discussion of areas of strength and weakness in the organisation’s capabilities.


Work reflects limited engagement with organisational context or relevant theory.


Not all aspects of task completed In sufficient detail.


Most aspects of the task completed but assessment lacks


cohesion.



Identifies and discusses areas of strength and weakness in the organisation’s capabilities. Discussion of some relevant issues in theory and organisational content in evaluation.


All aspects of the task completed – some cohesion.



Identifies and clearly explains areas of strength and weakness in the organisation’s capabilities.


Links to organisational context and relevant theory in evaluation.


All aspects of the task completed with minimal errors in cohesion



Identifies and insightfully discusses areas of strength and weakness in the organisation’s capabilities. Strong links to organisational context and relevant theory in evaluation.


All aspects of the task completed in a comprehensive and cohesive manner




Recommendations / conclusions






Value 30% Mark awarded



Few or no recommendations made / no justification.


Any recommendations made are not supported or are inaccurate.



Some recommendations made / not well linked to the results of the evaluation or relevant theory.



Good recommendations made, linked to the evaluation results / may not be linked back systematically to relevant theory



Very good recommendations made, linked to the evaluation. Theory used systematically to justify recommendations and discuss enhancement of the organisation’s capabilities



Excellent recommendations made, linked to the evaluation. Theory used in insightful way to justify recommendations and discuss enhancement of the organisation’s capabilities




Report presentation/ referencing






Value 10% Mark awarded



Referencing is absent / not systematic / incorrect



Acceptable presentation – obvious errors demonstrating lack of attention to detail.


Some attempt at referencing but obvious errors



Good presentation overall but some obvious errors.


Referencing is mainly accurate



Professional presentation – minor errors in some elements.


Correct referencing throughout



Highly professional presentation – satisfies all presentation elements.


Correct referencing throughout























Answered Same DayJan 17, 2021ACC300

Answer To: Assessment 3 Assessment Type: Case Study Assignment. Maximum word limit of 2,500 words Purpose:...

Kushal answered on Jan 19 2021
156 Votes
Contents
Accounting Standard for the risk of material misstatement    1
Part-1    1
Industry Analysis-    1
Environment analysis –    2
Company Analysis –    2
Part 2-    4
Recommendations    5
Conclusions    5
References    6
Accounting Standard for the risk of material misstatement
As per the accounting standards, AS 2110, the auditors need to ensure that the key material issues which are related to the income statement and the balance sheet which could materially impact (Shelton, S.
W., Whittington, O.R. and Landsittel) the message that the statements are willing to convey. The auditor needs to identify the risks and ensure that enough procedures have been followed, enough sensitivity analysis, scenario analysis, statistical procedures ( Schultz Jr, J.J., Bierstaker, J.L. and O’Donnell, E. )have been undertaken by them so the shareholders and investors can assess the impact of any changes in the assumptions (Shelton, S.W., Whittington, O.R. and Landsittel) taken into account by the management and provide a clear picture to them.
Part-1
Industry Analysis- 
The firm is in the financing business of the home loans.  This firm provides the loans to the people who need the home right now but does not have upfront cash for the same. 
Assuming that like every other home financing firm, they do not accept the deposits, they need to raise the money from banks or non-banking financial institutions, in order to lend the money to the home buyers.  In return the financing company, can claim the rights on the house, since they deal in the mortgage backed securities, in case of the defaults. In case no default takes place, the firm will be able to make money from the difference of the interest rate that they paying for borrowing the money and the interest rate that they charge to the home buyers for providing the loans. 
They need to set aside some provisions for the loans in order for the defaults due to one reason or another.  This might include the job loss, unexpected losses, other credit requirements etc.  When such event occurs, the home financing company takes the custody of the home and sells it in the secondary market or might sell it to someone asset restructuring firm. However, this might not yield the market prices due to the urgency of the event and hence, there will be some losses to the financing company.
This is how the industry works. Now the auditing firm needs to understand the industry thoroughly and the trends that have been present recently.  Accordingly, they need to take the judgements (Blay, A.D., Sneathen Jr, L.D. and Kizirian, T.) when the financial statements are prepared and based on the same the siding firm needs to ensure that there are no misspecifications as far as the reporting is concerned and no investors or shareholders, who trust the financial statements, are misguided. 
Environment analysis –
Environmental analysis play a major role in the strategic planning of the organization and more importance should be given to this while devising a long term strategy for the same.
As far as the economy and environment analysis is concerned, the auditors need to understand the changing consumer trends for the home loans at a holistic level.  How the trends around the income per capita,  GDP growth,  disposable income is changing which can give us a good set of insights around the home financing industry and how it can impact the growth of the industry and how it can impact the defaults and loan losses in the industry. 
Also, the auditors need to keep a close eye on the inflation, infrastructure activity, unemployment data, foreign exchange data, political stability, extensive PESTEL analysis to assess the impact of these external variables on the business.
Company Analysis –
As compared to the other firms in the industry and industry as a whole, the firm has been growing significantly at a faster pace. For these higher revenue and subsequently higher profits, we need to assess the practices followed by the firm.
Key matters –

1. HS has been consistently more profitable than the industry average by marketing mortgages on properties in a prosperous rural area which has experienced considerable growth in recent years. HS packages and sells mortgages to large investment trusts. Despite recent volatility of interest rates, HS has been able to continue selling its mortgages as a source of new lendable funds.
a. First and foremost, the firm has been tapping the markets which are located in the rural and suburban areas where due to faster infrastructure development, the growth in the home buying by these population and loan requirements for them is higher and hence, the firm is generating higher revenue.
b. Audit firm needs to take into the account of the...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here