Assessment 2: Social Policy Comparison Case Study (20%)Word Count: XXXXXXXXXXwordsDue Date: Week 9Case Study Coronavirus has claimed the lives of over half a million people worldwide, and this death...

Covid-19 In Australia and New Zealand                            4
COVID-19 IN AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND
Table of Contents
Introduction    3
Parallelism and Contrast    3
Challenges    4
Social and Economic Impacts    6
Conclusion    7
References    8
Introduction
The current Covid-19 plague has represented a few issues, including social, monetary, and wellbeing concerns, which have contacted for all intents and purposes all parts of human existence. The most troublesome component of this pandemic is that, regardless of the new disclosure of the condition, there is an absence of suitable guidelines and measures to forestall the ailment spread. Various governments have forced diverse protection measures, and these endeavors are more powerful in controlling sicknesses in specific nations than others. Australia is one of the nations with great protection procedures to appropriately deal with the condition. This examination analyzes Covid-19's response in Australia and New Zealand to limit the social, monetary, and wellbeing impacts of the sickness.
Parallelism and Contrast
In light of the Covid 19 pandemic situation, Australia and New Zealand have both presented unmatched financial and cultural imperatives. These limits appeared to have controlled the pandemic similarly well. Similarly, the two governments have a choice with regards to how long lockdown approaches will last and how much. The lockdown impacts prosperity in the two countries and this is hard to survey, however, the controls taken appear to forestall Covid-19 spread. Moreover, limits on different exercises, like work and preparing, have outcomes in the two countries (Flack et al., 2020).
The lockdown is indistinguishable in the two countries, yet their way of life and monetary action limits are unique. The impediments in New Zealand are intended to restrict its occupants to "air pocket" or family gatherings. On the opposite side, by precluding exercises including a specific gathering, the Australian government progressively expanded its impediments. On a similar point, Australian approach reactions show up more effective, however with restricted verification, and have more positive ramifications for the more prominent prosperity of its populace. Also, when its limits are loose, Australia is better positioned to bounce back. New Zealand strategies, then again, seem to make the country harder to recuperate from the shutdown. The Australian way to deal with action expands the range of exercises while New Zealand's way to deal with "bubbles" confines further exercises, including financial exercises.
There are a few lock-down methods utilized by the two nations. To begin with, the type of administration in these nations should...