This criterion is linked to a learning outcome
Criteria 1: Gibbs reflective cycle Step 1 - DescribeClear introduction of the situation includes brief description of what occurred within Australian healthcare system.
|
5PtsFull marks Outstanding, logical, and well-articulated description of the situation.
|
4PtsExceeds expectations Very good, clear, and logical description of the situation.
|
3PtsMeets expectations Good introduction that mostly describes the situation.
|
2PtsDeveloping Limited description of the situation identification.
|
1PtsUnsatisfactory Unsatisfactory description of the situation with insufficient and/or inaccurate detail.
|
0PtsNo marks Criterion not addressed.
|
|
5pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome
Criteria 2: Gibbs reflective cycle Step 2 - FeelingsReflect on thoughts and feelings of the situation described, including acknowledgement of bias, assumptions, and awareness of the situation.
|
10PtsFull marks Outstanding reflection of self in relation to existing thoughts and feelings of the situation. Outstanding exploration of bias, assumptions and awareness is acknowledged and explored.
|
8PtsExceeds expectations Very good reflection of self in relation to existing thoughts and feelings of the situation. Clear exploration of bias, assumptions and awareness is acknowledged and explored.
|
6PtsMeets expectations Good reflection of self in relation to existing thoughts and feelings of the situation. Bias, assumptions, and awareness are mostly explored.
|
4PtsDeveloping Partial reflection of self in relation to existing thoughts and feelings of the situation. Limited acknowledgement of bias, assumptions, or awareness.
|
2PtsUnsatisfactory Unsatisfactory reflection of self in relation to existing thoughts and feelings of the situation. Insufficient or no acknowledgement of bias, assumptions, or awareness.
|
0PtsNo marks Criterion not addressed.
|
|
10pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome
Criteria 3: Gibbs reflective cycle Step 3 - EvaluationEvaluation of the situation and how it was handled, either by self or others. Clear discussion of how self and others reacted.
|
10PtsFull marks Outstanding, logical, and well-articulated evaluation of the situation.
|
8PtsExceeds expectations Very good, clear, and logical evaluation of the situation.
|
6PtsMeets expectations Good evaluation that mostly describes the situation.
|
4PtsDeveloping Limited evaluation of the situation identification.
|
2PtsUnsatisfactory Unsatisfactory evaluation of the situation with insufficient and/or inaccurate detail.
|
0PtsNo marks Criterion not addressed.
|
|
10pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome
Criteria 4: Gibbs reflective cycle Step 4 - AnalysisAnalysis of why situation may have occurred. Codes, guidelines, policies and legislation are examined to determine if they supported or prevented the situation or possible harm from occurring.
|
20PtsFull marks Outstanding analysis of situation with well-articulated examination of how codes, guidelines, policies and legislation impacted possible harm from occurring. No mistakes or omissions.
|
16PtsExceeds expectations Very good analysis of situation with examination of how codes, guidelines, policies and legislation impacted possible harm from occurring. Minimal mistakes or omissions.
|
12PtsMeets expectations Good analysis of situation with codes, guidelines, policies and legislation mostly linked to situation and possible harm occurring. Some mistakes and/or omissions.
|
8PtsDeveloping Limited analysis of situation that somewhat examined how codes, guidelines, policies and legislation could impact harm occurring. Significant mistakes and omissions.
|
4PtsUnsatisfactory Unsatisfactory analysis of situation. codes, guidelines, policies and legislation are not explored and/or relevant to analysis.
|
0PtsNo marks Criterion not addressed.
|
|
20pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome
Criteria 5: Gibbs reflective cycle Step 5 - ConclusionDescription of what has been learnt about the situation and the impact learning has had on self, with acknowledgement of changes required in healthcare system to reduce bias, harassment and/or racism that is supported by peer-reviewed evidence.
|
10PtsFull marks Outstanding, logical, and well-articulated conclusion that explores the impact of learning has had on self and changes required in Australian healthcare system. Statements are supported by relevant contemporary peer reviewed evidence. No errors or omissions
|
8PtsExceeds expectations Very good conclusion that explores the impact of learning has had on self and changes required in Australian healthcare system. Statements are supported by relevant contemporary peer reviewed evidence with minimal errors and/or omissions.
|
6PtsMeets expectations Good conclusion on the situation and what learning has had on self, with good discussion on changes required in Australian healthcare system. Statements are somewhat supported by relevant contemporary peer reviewed evidence. Some errors and/or omissions.
|
4PtsDeveloping Partial conclusion on learning about situation has had on self, with limited awareness and discussion. Partial discussion on changes required in healthcare system with minimal evidence to support statements made. Significant errors and/or omissions.
|
2PtsUnsatisfactory Unsatisfactory conclusion on impact of learning to self and/or changes required in healthcare system. Statements are not support by relevant contemporary evidence.
|
0PtsNo marks Criterion not addressed.
|
|
10pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome
Criteria 6: Gibbs reflective cycle Step 6 - Action PlanCreation of an action plan with three strategies for self.
Strategies described are for own future professional practice with clear linkage to ethical principles, codes, guidelines, and policy.
|
20PtsFull marks Outstanding presentation of three strategies to inform future self-practice, with outstanding linkage to relevant ethical principles, codes, guidelines, and policies. Well-articulated strategies that reflect conclusion on changes required in healthcare system.
|
16PtsExceeds expectations Very good presentation of three strategies to inform future self-practice, with clear linkage to relevant codes, guidelines, and policies. Strategies reflect conclusion on changes required in healthcare system.
|
12PtsMeets expectations Good presentation of three strategies to inform future self-practice, with relevant ethical principles, codes, guidelines, and policies mostly linked. Strategies are mostly linked to conclusion on changes required in healthcare system.
|
8PtsDeveloping Partial presentation of up to three strategies with limited linkage to appropriate ethical principles, codes, guidelines, and policies. Strategies require further linkage to conclusion on changes required in healthcare system.
|
4PtsUnsatisfactory Unsatisfactory presentation of less than three strategies that do not link to future self-practice, with limited to no use of ethical principles, codes, guidelines, and policies relevant to future practice. Strategies do not link to discussion on changes required in health care system.
|
0PtsNo marks Criterion not addressed.
|
|
20pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome
Criteria 7: Design and PresentationPresentation encompasses both audio and visual elements. Use of media is visually appealing with consideration given to graphic design including use of colour, fonts, and imagery.
Audience is engaged by both audio and visual mechanisms for digital storytelling.
Audio elements is clear and relates to visual elements of presentation.
Content in audio elements represents safe, appropriate, and effective communication with clear presentation of information, and consideration given to clarity of delivery and use of professional and culturally appropriate terminology.
|
10PtsFull marks Outstanding presentation of digital storytelling incorporating imagery, audio, and visual elements to engage audience. Excellent structure and articulation of ideas within the assessment that reflects assessment instructions. Insightful design and presentation techniques are utilised to ensure clear, effective, and culturally appropriate communication and terminology of complex concepts to the target audience.
|
8PtsExceeds expectations Very good presentation of digital storytelling with use of imagery, audio, and visual elements. Very good structure and articulation of ideas within the assessment that reflects assessment instructions. Very good design and presentation techniques are utilised to ensure clear, effective, and culturally appropriate communication and terminology of complex concepts to the target audience.
|
6PtsMeets expectations Good presentation of digital storytelling with use of imagery, audio, and visual elements. Good structure and articulation of ideas that mostly reflects the assessment instructions. Good design within presentation that mostly provides clear, effective, and culturally appropriate communication and terminology.
|
4PtsDeveloping Partial demonstration of digital storytelling, with limited engagement of audience with some use of imagery, audio, or visual elements. Mostly adequate structure and articulation of ideas that partially reflects the assessment instructions. Use of effective and culturally appropriate communication and terminology is limited.
|
2PtsUnsatisfactory Unsatisfactory demonstration of digital storytelling with missing elements (either audio, visual and/or imagery to engage audience). Poor articulation of ideas within the assessment, including minimal use of professional terminology. Structure and delivery of the discussion do not provide adequate clarity.
|
0PtsNo marks Criterion not addressed.
|
|
10pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome
Criteria 8: Scholarly approach to assignmentScholarly academic writing using evidence to inform arguments, support definitions and an ethical approach to using the ideas and academic work of others.
Evidence of relevant literature used to support discussion includes:
• Australian current evidence-based practice guidelines, standards of practice, codes.
• Relevant, peer-reviewed academic literature published within five (5) years, 2019-2024.
• Australian Legislation and case law, seminal works where relevant.
APA 7th Style followed including, not limited to:
• Student ID at beginning of presentation and on each page of transcript.
• Page numbers on each page of transcript.
• Correct use of intext citations for referencing
• Reference list attached to transcript follows APA 7th Style.
|
10PtsFull marks Outstanding use of evidence to inform arguments, support definitions and adhere to an ethical approach when using the ideas and work of others. Evidence is current and applicable. Outstanding adherence to APA 7th edition with no errors or omissions.
|
8PtsExceeds expectations Very good use of evidence to inform arguments, support definitions and adhere to an ethical approach when using the ideas and work of others. Evidence is current and relevant with minor errors, which do not detract from the applicability of the work. Very good adherence to APA 7th edition with minimal errors or omissions.
|
6PtsMeets expectations Good use of evidence to inform arguments, support definitions and adhere to an ethical approach when using the ideas and work of others. Evidence is current and mostly relevant with some errors and/or omissions which somewhat detracts from the applicability of the work. Good adherence to APA 7th edition with some errors or omissions.
|
4PtsDeveloping Partial use of evidence to inform arguments, support definitions and adhere to an ethical approach when using the ideas and work of others. Not all evidence used is current and/or relevant with frequent errors and/or omissions which detract from the applicability of the work. Partial adherence to APA 7th edition but errors or omissions present throughout.
|
2PtsUnsatisfactory Unsatisfactory use of evidence to inform arguments, support definitions and adhere to an ethical approach when using the ideas and work of others. Evidence used is not current and/or relevant with significant errors and/or omissions which significantly detracts from the applicability of the work. Unsatisfactory adherence to APA 7th edition, with significant errors and/or omissions present throughout.
|
0PtsNo marks Criterion not addressed.
|
|
10pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome
Criteria 9: Scholarly approach to assignmentFollows conventional academic approach including – academic language, grammar, spelling, punctuation, and syntax in both the written and narrated components.
|
5PtsFull marks Outstanding adherence to academic language principles including (but not limited to) spelling, grammar, punctuation, and terminology.
|
4PtsExceeds expectations Very good adherence to academic language principles including (but not limited to) spelling, grammar, punctuation, and terminology.
|
3PtsMeets expectations Good adherence to academic language principles including (but not limited to) spelling, grammar, punctuation, and terminology.
|
2PtsDeveloping Partial adherence to academic language principles including (but not limited to) spelling, grammar, punctuation, and terminology.
|
1PtsUnsatisfactory Unsatisfactory adherence to academic language principles including (but not limited to) spelling, grammar, punctuation, and terminology.
|
0PtsNo marks Criterion not addressed.
|
|
5pts
|
Total points:100
|