3305AFE ASSIGNMENT TRIMESTER 1 2021 WEIGHT 25% DUE DATE FRI JUNE 4 ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS WITH WORKING AND INCLUDE ALL RELEVENT ECONOMETRIC OUTPUTS FROM EVIEWS NOMINAL LENGTH: 2000 WORDS EXCLUDING...

1 answer below »

View more »
Answered 4 days AfterMay 28, 20213305AFEGriffith University

Answer To: 3305AFE ASSIGNMENT TRIMESTER 1 2021 WEIGHT 25% DUE DATE FRI JUNE 4 ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS WITH WORKING...

Mohd answered on Jun 01 2021
160 Votes
Q1: 5 marks
Malaria is a disease that is highly prevalent through much of the developing world. It takes the form of a parasite that is carried by mosquitoes, and hence it is particularly severe in warm and wet climates where the insects thrive. Given that malaria has a high mortality rate and can incapacitate a large proportion of the working age population, the disease is thought to contribute greatly to poverty throughout Africa and Asia.
There is a large research effort dedicated to assessing the effectiveness of preventative measures in order to control the disease, including the use of mosquito nets. Your task is to examine the effectiveness of a mosquito net program using data collected from villages in Senegal. In some villages the researchers distr
ibuted mosquito nets (the treatment group) while in others they did not (the control group). The data was obtained by recording details of each village twice, before and after the nets were handed out.
The data can be found in the file malaria.wf1 where the variables are defined as follows: malaria gives the percent infection rate in the village, income gives the average income level (in USD), rain gives the annual rainfall, water is a dummy variable which is equal to one if there is a stagnant water source, and temperature is the average temperature in degrees Celsius. In addition, there are two dummy variables. Period denotes the time period where 0 indicates the period before the nets were distributed, and 1 denotes the period after. MN denotes the villages that received the nets with a value of 1.
1. To assess the effectiveness of the program a difference-in-differences estimator is used. Briefly explain the concept of a “parallel trend” for this estimator and what this assumption implies for the mosquito net program.
Assumption of parallel trend:
Difference in difference can be referred to as quasi experimental design which uses longitudinal data collected over a period of time. "Parallel trend" is the only important assumption to estimate difference in difference estimator to ensure internal validity of difference in difference estimator. In the absence of treatment (effectiveness of preventive measures). The difference between distribution of mosquito nets (treatment group) didn't distribution of mosquito nets (control group) remained constant over a period of time.
2. Why can’t we estimate the effectiveness of the program by simply averaging the malarial rates (in the latter period) for villages that did and did not receive the nets? Briefly explain
In our longitudinal data, we have multiple levels in categorical variables. Each level represents its own group which we can refer to as a treatment or control group. To assess effectiveness of treatment we should analyse data in differences over a period of time that we can't achieve by simply averaging malarial rates
3. Calculate the difference-in-differences estimate of the effectiveness of the program (in terms of reduction in percent infections) based only upon average rates before and after the nets were distributed.
    Dependent Variable: D(MALARIA)
    
    Method: Least Squares
    
    
    Date: 06/01/21 Time: 18:49
    
    
    Sample (adjusted): 2 162
    
    
    Included observations: 161 after adjustments
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Variable
    Coefficient
    Std. Error
    t-Statistic
    Prob.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    C
    -5.387937
    1.098024
    -4.906937
    0.0000
    RAIN
    0.025710
    0.004140
    6.210532
    0.0000
    MN
    -3.330169
    0.336043
    -9.909955
    0.0000
    WATER
    0.691902
    0.332923
    2.078266
    0.0393
    PERIOD
    -0.038584
    0.329237
    -0.117192
    0.9069
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    R-squared
    0.456763
        Mean dependent var
    -0.028571
    Adjusted R-squared
    0.442834
        S.D. dependent var
    2.798156
    S.E. of regression
    2.088644
        Akaike info criterion
    4.341470
    Sum squared resid
    680.5394
        Schwarz criterion
    4.437166
    Log likelihood
    -344.4883
        Hannan-Quinn criter.
    4.380327
    F-statistic
    32.79187
        Durbin-Watson stat
    2.515573
    Prob(F-statistic)
    0.000000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
4. Give the regression equation that would be used to calculate the full difference-in-difference estimate employing the full set of control variables. Also estimate this equation and interpret the results. Why is this estimate preferable to the estimate given in part 3?
Estimation Equation:
=========================
D(MALARIA) = C(1) + C(2)*RAIN + C(3)*MN + C(4)*WATER + C(5)*PERIOD + C(6)*MN*PERIOD
Substituted Coefficients:
=========================
D(MALARIA) = -5.94891969608 + 0.0258803507645*RAIN - 2.18859791855*MN + 0.699917082172*WATER + 0.978246418703*PERIOD - 2.27337558041*MN*PERIOD
This estimate has higher adjusted r square value, by adding interaction term we can explain 48.61 variability in response variable. F(4,2162)=30.72 with pvalue <0.05. our model is statistically significant.
    Dependent Variable: D(MALARIA)
    
    Method: Least Squares
    
    
    Date: 06/01/21 Time: 14:52
    
    
    Sample (adjusted): 2 162
    
    
    Included observations: 161 after adjustments
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Variable
    Coefficient
    Std. Error
    t-Statistic
    Prob.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    C
    -5.948920
    1.070798
    -5.555596
    0.0000
    MN*PERIOD
    -2.273376
    0.638758
    -3.559057
    0.0005
    RAIN
    0.025880
    0.003993
    6.480832
    0.0000
    MN
    -2.188598
    0.456013
    -4.799415
    0.0000
    WATER
    0.699917
    0.321139
    2.179485
    0.0308
    PERIOD
    0.978246
    0.427177
    2.290025
    0.0234
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    R-squared
    0.497803
        Mean dependent var
    -0.028571
    Adjusted R-squared
    0.481604
        S.D. dependent var
    2.798156
    S.E. of regression
    2.014666
        Akaike info criterion
    4.275338
    Sum squared resid
    629.1260
        Schwarz criterion
    4.390173
    Log likelihood
    -338.1647
        Hannan-Quinn criter.
    4.321966
    F-statistic
    30.72882
        Durbin-Watson stat
    2.426540
    Prob(F-statistic)
    0.000000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
5. Briefly perform some diagnostics on your model. Do the coefficients make sense? Are there any signs of misspecification? Are the residuals in line with your assumptions?
We have tested several regression assumptions regarding residuals. All coefficients are statistically significant with relatively low standard error. VIF for all variable are greater than 1, that means there is no multicollinearity. Residuals are not having any pattern or serial correlation. All the residuals assumption has met.
    Variance Inflation Factors
    
    Date: 06/01/21 Time: 15:15
    
    Sample: 1 162
    
    
    Included observations: 161
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Coefficient
    Uncentered
    Centered
    Variable
    Variance
    VIF
    VIF
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    C
     1.146608
     45.48151
     NA
    MN*PERIOD
     0.408012
     3.618837
     2.809656
    RAIN
     1.59E-05
     41.86611
     1.024200
    MN
     0.207948
     3.688773
     2.039135
    WATER
     0.103130
     1.981864
     1.021706
    PERIOD
     0.182480
     3.641625
     1.809503
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Heteroskedasticity Test: Breusch-Pagan-Godfrey
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    F-statistic
    1.730107
        Prob. F(4,156)
    0.1460
    Obs*R-squared
    6.838853
        Prob. Chi-Square(4)
    0.1447
    Scaled explained SS
    5.831917
        Prob. Chi-Square(4)
    0.2121
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
Q2: 6 marks
A financial firm has hired you to study the empirical links between an aggregate of monthly returns on a US tech portfolio, and returns on similar portfolios based on European firms and firms from Hong Kong. The file tech.wf1 has 240 observations on these variables, denoted US, Eur and...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here
April
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2025
2025
2026
2027
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
30
31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
1
2
3
00:00
00:30
01:00
01:30
02:00
02:30
03:00
03:30
04:00
04:30
05:00
05:30
06:00
06:30
07:00
07:30
08:00
08:30
09:00
09:30
10:00
10:30
11:00
11:30
12:00
12:30
13:00
13:30
14:00
14:30
15:00
15:30
16:00
16:30
17:00
17:30
18:00
18:30
19:00
19:30
20:00
20:30
21:00
21:30
22:00
22:30
23:00
23:30