ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS ON THE EXAM PAPER AND SHOW FULL WORKING Question 1 Heteroskedasticity[10 marks] A researcher on the economics of innovation is interested in the country-level factors that...

1 answer below »


ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS ON THE EXAM PAPER AND SHOW FULL WORKING






Question 1
Heteroskedasticity[10 marks]





A researcher on the economics of innovation is interested in the country-level factors that predict R&D (Research and Development) investment.To study this, they take data on 27 OECD countries and regress R&D investment (as a percentage of GDP) against economic output (measured as the log of GDP), and educational attainments (the fraction of young people that have some tertiary education).


The following regression equation is used to model the relationship. Hereydenotes the fraction of expenditure on R&D andandare the GDP and educational variables respectively.



The economist is worried that the error term from this model might be ‘heteroskedastic’.Give a brief definition/description of heteroskedasticity and explain why it is a problem for regression models such as this.
















(2 marks)


A plot of the residual terms against the log of real GDP is given below in Figure 1.On the basis of this graph, what would you conclude about the error variance in your model?What problems would it raise for your estimation? Discuss.




Figure 1. Residuals Log GDP per Capita – R&D Model




























(2 marks)


Suppose you feel that the error term of the stated model is heteroskedastic and has the structure



Perform a GLS transformation of the modelsuch that the errors will be homoskedastic. State the transformed model.











(3 marks)



Prove theoretically that the errors from the transformed model will have a constant variance.












(3 marks)






Question 2
Autocorrelation[8 marks]





A researcher studying energy markets is trying to produce a model for daily electricity prices () based upon daily temperatures (). A data set containing 201 observations is analyzed where prices are measured in cents per kilowatt-hour while temperatures are in degrees Celsius. The model below is estimated



where both variables are stationary.


The output from Eviews is given in Table 1.





Table 1. Eviews Output for Electricity Model

























































































































































Dependent Variable: PRICE







Method: Least Squares













Sample: 1 201









Included observations: 201



























Variable



Coefficient



Std. Error



t-Statistic



Prob.























C



10.67810



1.115281



9.574360



0.0000



TEMP



0.571329



0.055512



10.29205



0.0000























R-squared



0.347383



Mean dependent var



22.05066



Adjusted R-squared



0.344104



S.D. dependent var



2.646967



S.E. of regression



2.143710



Akaike info criterion



4.372854



Sum squared resid



914.5033



Schwarz criterion



4.405722



Log likelihood



-437.4718



Hannan-Quinn criter.



4.386154



F-statistic



105.9263



Durbin-Watson stat



0.386975



Prob(F-statistic)



0.000000






























































To visualise the model the researcher also produces the following plot:




Figure 2. Residual, Actual and Fitted Series for Electricity Price Model






Note: Observation numbers ordered by time are given on the horizontal axis. The right vertical axis gives price and the left vertical axis gives the residual.



Based on Figure 2 comment briefly on the performance of the model. Are the standard errors reported in Table 1 likely to be correct? Why or why not?














(2 marks)


A Lagrange Multiplier (LM) test may be used to check for autocorrelation in the residuals of the model given in Table 1. The output of the test is given below in Table 2.




Table 2. Lagrange Multiplier Test for Autocorrelation – Electricity Price Model



































































































































































































































Breusch-Godfrey Serial Correlation LM Test:

























F-statistic



167.8504



Prob. F(2,197)



0.0000



Obs*R-squared



126.6675



Prob. Chi-Square(2)



0.0000

































Test Equation:









Dependent Variable: RESID







Method: Least Squares













Sample: 1 201









Included observations: 201







Presample missing value lagged residuals set to zero.























Variable



Coefficient



Std. Error



t-Statistic



Prob.























C



-0.107613



0.681878



-0.157818



0.8748



TEMP



0.005326



0.033939



0.156932



0.8755



RESID(-1)



0.800328



0.071299



11.22498



0.0000



RESID(-2)



-0.008061



0.071390



-0.112916



0.9102























R-squared



0.630186



Mean dependent var



3.92E-15



Adjusted R-squared



0.624555



S.D. dependent var



2.138344



S.E. of regression



1.310240



Akaike info criterion



3.397998



Sum squared resid



338.1957



Schwarz criterion



3.463735



Log likelihood



-337.4988



Hannan-Quinn criter.



3.424598



F-statistic



111.9003



Durbin-Watson stat



1.939251



Prob(F-statistic)



0.000000






























Give the test equation, the hypotheses, the test statistic and the appropriate p-value.What order of autocorrelation appears to be present in the residuals? Discuss.











(2 marks)


Another test for autocorrelation incomes from the correlogram.The output is reported in Table 3.



Table 3. Correlogram Q-Statistics of Residuals – Electricity Price Model



Are the results of the correlogram consistent with the results from the LM test? Why or why not? Explain your answer.







(2 marks)


Given the results of the LM test and the correlogram, how could the original equation



be modified to model the autocorrelation more effectively? Give equations for two alternative regression models that could potentially account for any autocorrelation that you have observed.




















(2 marks)
















Question 3
Dummy Variables[8 marks]


A political scientist is interested in the factors that influence voter preferences. To model the effect of various characteristics of US political candidates upon polling performance, the following equation can be estimated



whereis the candidate’s vote share,is the candidate’s age,is the budget of the campaign andis the number of endorsements the candidate received.


The political scientist feels that there may be structural differences in the regression equations for candidates that do and do not have advanced degrees. LetDdenote a dummy variable that is equal to zero if the candidatedoes nothave an advanced degree; and one if the candidatedoeshave an advanced degree.


Help the political scientist by showing the procedure used to conduct the Chow test. Give the unrestricted and restricted models and the null and alternative hypotheses. What conclusion should the political scientist draw if the null hypothesis is rejected?




















(4 marks)


Explain what is meant by the term ‘Dummy Variable Trap’.
















(2 marks)



In a famous research paper, David Card and Alan Krueger used a difference in difference estimator to evaluate the effect of minimum wages on employment in the US. A minimum wage was implemented in New Jersey (NJ) but not in Pennsylvania (PA) and the authors took employment data in both states before and after this occurred. Let FTE denote the level of full time equivalent employment,D denote a dummy variable indicating the time period after the wages were introduced, and NJ denote a dummy variable that indicates New Jersey.


Card and Krueger estimated the model



and the output is in Table 4.





















Table 4. Difference-in-Difference Equation for FTE Employment






































































































































































Dependent Variable: FTE







Method: Least Squares













Sample: 1 820









Included observations: 794



























Variable



Coefficient



Std. Error



t-Statistic



Prob.























C



23.33117



1.071870



21.76679



0.0000



D



-2.165584



1.515853



-1.428625



0.1535



NJ



-2.891761



1.193524



-2.422877



0.0156



D*NJ



2.753606



1.688409



1.630888



0.1033























R-squared



0.007401



Mean dependent var



21.02651



Adjusted R-squared



0.003632



S.D. dependent var



9.422746



S.E. of regression



9.405619



Akaike info criterion



7.325517



Sum squared resid



69887.88



Schwarz criterion



7.349079



Log likelihood



-2904.230



Hannan-Quinn criter.



7.334571



F-statistic



1.963536



Durbin-Watson stat



1.860208



Prob(F-statistic)



0.117983






























What effect did the minimum wage have on FTE employment in New Jersey? Is this result consistent to what is predicted by economic theory?Why or why not?









(2 marks)











Question 4
Instrumental Variables[9 marks]


Since the early 2000s, the United States has seen a dramatic increase in the abuse of prescription opioids (a strong painkiller chemically derived from heroin). Approximately 500,000 deaths have been attributed to the drug, and its usage has been described as an ongoing emergency for public health.


Consider a health economist who is interested in determining the health effects of opioid use.She takes numerical summary data on the health (y) of individuals (a number from 0-100 where higher values indicate better health), and regresses this against their age (), body mass index (), education (),and a gender dummy (). She also includes the key variable measuring opioid use (). The model is the following linear specification:



Explain to the health economist why variablemay be endogenous withy, and hence whycannot be interpreted as the causal impact of opioid use on health.



















(3 marks)



To estimate a causal effect in this context, at least one valid instrument is required. List three statistical properties required of a variable in order to act as a valid instrument.











(3 marks)



Suppose you determine two valid instrumentsandfor estimating the casual impact of opioid use upon health. Explain how the Hausman test employing instrumentsandcan be used to determine if the variableis endogenous. Outline the two-stage testing procedure, including the test equation and hypotheses.














(3 marks)





Question 5
Non-Stationary Time Series[15 marks]


Daily prices for three stock market indices (from Hong Kong - Hang Seng, Japan - Nikkei and the US – S&P500) are shown below.There are approximately 250 observations from each series sourced from 2020-2021.




Figure 3. Value of Hang Seng Index – 2020-2021





Figure 4. Value of Nikkei 225 - 2020-2021







Figure 5. Value of S&P500 – 2020-2021




A financial analyst examines the time-series properties of each variable by estimating the following Dicky-Fuller equations:



(1)


(2)


(3)



To test for stationarity the following hypotheses are used





and tau (τ) statistics are obtained for each variable using the three test equations. The results for the three indices are given in Table 5.




Table 5. τ Statistics for Dickey Fuller Tests – Hang Seng, Nikkei, S&P500






























Model



Hang Seng (τ)



Nikkei (τ)



S&P 500 (τ)





0.79



1.36



2.06





-1.34



-0.81



-0.86





-2.15



-1.83



-3.77




By identifying the appropriate test statistic and critical value for each variable, determine whether the prices of the indices are stationary at the 5% significance level.













(3 marks)



Briefly explain (i.e. one sentence each) how the appropriate test statistics and critical values are determined in each case.













(3 marks)


The analyst feels that due to some regional similarities, the Hang Seng and Nikkei indices might be cointegrated. To test for cointegration they run the following regression:



A plot of the residual seriesis presented below.




Figure 6. Residual Plot – Cointegrating Equation




On the basis of the plot, do you think the Hang Seng and Nikkei indices are cointegrated?What features of the plot would you look for in determining whether the series are cointegrated or not? Explain.










(2 marks)



To test for cointegration the analyst performs a unit root test upon these residuals. If a value ofis obtained, determine if the series are cointegrated. Show your working.









(3 marks)






Suppose the analyst decides that the Nikkei and Hang Seng indices are I(1) and proceeds to model them in first differences. They specify the following ARDL model



whereis the change in the Nikkei in timetandis the change in the Hang Seng at timet. The results are reported below in Table 6.



Table 6. Autoregressive Distributed Lag Model – Nikkei and Hang Seng










































































































































































Dependent Variable: DNIKKEI







Method: Least Squares













Sample (adjusted): -





Included observations: 241 after adjustments

























Variable



Coefficient



Std. Error



t-Statistic



Prob.























C



26.01895



16.73171



1.555068



0.1213



DNIKKEI(-1)



-0.077421



0.064901



-1.192903



0.2341



DNIKKEI(-2)



-0.001613



0.064269



-0.025103



0.9800



DHANGSENG(-1)



0.124815



0.053114



2.349933



0.0196



DHANGSENG(-2)



0.093489



0.053312



1.753631



0.0808























R-squared



0.030175



Mean dependent var



28.29643



Adjusted R-squared



0.013737



S.D. dependent var



258.4867



S.E. of regression



256.7052



Akaike info criterion



13.95426



Sum squared resid



15551818



Schwarz criterion



14.02656



Log likelihood



-1676.489



Hannan-Quinn criter.



13.98339



F-statistic



1.835710



Durbin-Watson stat



2.016709



Prob(F-statistic)



0.122702





























Interpret the model by briefly discussing its dynamics.Does the Nikkei index exhibit momentum effects?Do changes in the Hang Seng index appear to drive changes in the Nikkei?If so, how long does it take for effects to spill over from the Hong Kong market to the Japanese market? Use a significance level of 10% to answer this question.













(4 marks)







Answered 9 days AfterJul 19, 20213305AFEGriffith University

Answer To: ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS ON THE EXAM PAPER AND SHOW FULL WORKING Question 1 Heteroskedasticity[10...

Mohd answered on Jul 28 2021
154 Votes
3305AFE APPLIED ECONOMETRICS FINAL EXAM
TRIMESTER 1 2021         WEIGHT 50%
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS ON THE EXAM PAPER AND SHOW FULL WORKING
Question 1    Heteroskedasticity    [10 marks]
A researcher on the economics of innovation is interested in the country-level factors that predict R&D (Research and Development) investment. To study this, they take data on 27 OECD countries and regress R&D investment (as a percentage of GDP) against economic output (measured as the log of GDP), and educational attainments (the fraction of young people that have some tertiary education).
The following regression equation is used to model the relationship. Here y denotes the fraction of expenditure on R&D and and are the GDP and educational variables respectively.
The economist is worried that the error term from this model might be ‘heteroskedastic’. Give a brief definition/des
cription of heteroskedasticity and explain why it is a problem for regression models such as this.
A. Heteroskedastic refer to the condition in which standard deviation of error term of regression model is not constant. Its negatively impact performance of our regression model. We can explain his variability by one or more explanatory variable.
(2 marks)
A plot of the residual terms against the log of real GDP is given below in Figure 1. On the basis of this graph, what would you conclude about the error variance in your model? What problems would it raise for your estimation? Discuss.
Figure 1. Residuals Log GDP per Capita – R&D Model
(2 marks)
Suppose you feel that the error term of the stated model is heteroskedastic and has the structure
Perform a GLS transformation of the model such that the errors will be homoskedastic. State the transformed model.
(3 marks)
Prove theoretically that the errors from the transformed model will have a constant variance.
(3 marks)
Question 2    Autocorrelation    [8 marks]
A researcher studying energy markets is trying to produce a model for daily electricity prices () based upon daily temperatures (). A data set containing 201 observations is analyzed where prices are measured in cents per kilowatt-hour while temperatures are in degrees Celsius. The model below is estimated
where both variables are stationary.
The output from Eviews is given in Table 1.
Table 1. Eviews Output for Electricity Model
    Dependent Variable: PRICE
    
    
    Method: Least Squares
    
    
    
    
    
    Sample: 1 201
    
    
    
    Included observations: 201
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Variable
    Coefficient
    Std. Error
    t-Statistic
    Prob.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    C
    10.67810
    1.115281
    9.574360
    0.0000
    TEMP
    0.571329
    0.055512
    10.29205
    0.0000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    R-squared
    0.347383
        Mean dependent var
    22.05066
    Adjusted R-squared
    0.344104
        S.D. dependent var
    2.646967
    S.E. of regression
    2.143710
        Akaike info criterion
    4.372854
    Sum squared resid
    914.5033
        Schwarz criterion
    4.405722
    Log likelihood
    -437.4718
        Hannan-Quinn criter.
    4.386154
    F-statistic
    105.9263
        Durbin-Watson stat
    0.386975
    Prob(F-statistic)
    0.000000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
To visualise the model the researcher also produces the following plot:
Figure 2. Residual, Actual and Fitted Series for Electricity Price Model
Note: Observation numbers ordered by time are given on the horizontal axis. The right vertical axis gives price and the left vertical axis gives the residual.
Based on Figure 2 comment briefly on the performance of the model. Are the standard errors reported in Table 1 likely to be correct? Why or why not?
We have different measure scale for both explanatory variable and response variable that could be significant cause behind autocorrelation. Yes, the standard errors are likely to be correct | P-value << 0.05.
(2 marks)
A Lagrange Multiplier (LM) test may be used to check for autocorrelation in the residuals of the model given in Table 1. The output of the test is given below in Table 2.
Table 2. Lagrange Multiplier Test for Autocorrelation – Electricity Price Model
    Breusch-Godfrey Serial Correlation LM Test:
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    F-statistic
    167.8504
        Prob. F(2,197)
    0.0000
    Obs*R-squared
    126.6675
        Prob. Chi-Square(2)
    0.0000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Test Equation:
    
    
    
    Dependent Variable: RESID
    
    
    Method: Least Squares
    
    
    
    
    
    Sample: 1 201
    
    
    
    Included observations: 201
    
    
    Presample missing value lagged residuals set to zero.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Variable
    Coefficient
    Std. Error
    t-Statistic
    Prob.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    C
    -0.107613
    0.681878
    -0.157818
    0.8748
    TEMP
    0.005326
    0.033939
    0.156932
    0.8755
    RESID(-1)
    0.800328
    0.071299
    11.22498
    0.0000
    RESID(-2)
    -0.008061
    0.071390
    -0.112916
    0.9102
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    R-squared
    0.630186
        Mean dependent var
    3.92E-15
    Adjusted R-squared
    0.624555
        S.D. dependent var
    2.138344
    S.E. of regression
    1.310240
        Akaike info criterion
    3.397998
    Sum squared resid
    338.1957
        Schwarz criterion
    3.463735
    Log likelihood
    -337.4988
        Hannan-Quinn criter.
    3.424598
    F-statistic
    111.9003
        Durbin-Watson stat
    1.939251
    Prob(F-statistic)
    0.000000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
Give the test equation, the hypotheses, the test statistic and the appropriate p-value. What order of autocorrelation appears to be present in the residuals? Discuss.
The test rejects the hypothesis of no serial correlation up to order two. The Q-statistic and the LM test both indicate that the residuals are serially correlated and the equation should be re-specified before using it for hypothesis tests and forecasting. “The null hypothesis of the test is that there is no serial correlation in the residuals up to the specified order. EViews reports a statistic labelled “F-statistic” and an “Obs*R-squared” (the number of observations times the R-square) statistic. The statistic has an asymptotic distribution under the null hypothesis. The distribution of the F-statistic is not known, but is often used to conduct an informal test of the null.”
(2 marks)
Another test for autocorrelation in comes from the correlogram. The output is reported in Table 3.
Table 3. Correlogram Q-Statistics of Residuals – Electricity Price Model
Are the results of the correlogram consistent with the results from the LM test? Why or why not? Explain your answer.
A. The correlogram has spikes at lags up to eight and at lag twenty-eight. The Q-statistics are significant at all lags, indicating significant serial correlation in the residuals.
(2 marks)
Given the results of the LM test and the correlogram, how could the original equation
be modified to model the autocorrelation more effectively? Give equations for two alternative regression models that could potentially account for any autocorrelation that you have observed.
A. The Q-statistic and the LM test both indicate that the residuals are serially correlated and the equation should be re-specified before using it for hypothesis tests and forecasting.
(2 marks)
Question 3    Dummy Variables    [8 marks]
A political scientist is interested in the factors that influence voter preferences. To model the effect of various characteristics of US political candidates upon polling performance, the following equation can be estimated
where is the candidate’s vote share, is the candidate’s age, is the budget of the campaign and is the number of endorsements the candidate received.
The political scientist feels that there may be structural differences in the regression equations for candidates that do and do not have advanced degrees. Let D denote a dummy variable that is equal to zero if the candidate does not have an advanced degree; and one if the candidate does have an advanced degree.
Help the political scientist by showing the procedure used to conduct the Chow test. Give the unrestricted and restricted models and the null and alternative hypotheses. What conclusion should the political scientist draw if the null hypothesis is rejected?
A. As a matter of course the Chow breakpoint test tests whether there is a primary change in the entirety of the condition boundaries. In any case if the condition is direct EViews permits you to test whether there has been a primary change in a subset of the boundaries.
B. We partition the information into at least two subsamples. Each subsample should contain a larger number of perceptions than the quantity of coefficients in the condition so the condition can be assessed. The Chow breakpoint test...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here