Draft 1 by Stephanie Church Submission date: 15-Apr XXXXXXXXXX:13AM (UTC-0700) Submission ID: XXXXXXXXXX File name: Document_38.docx (12.59K) Word count: 250 Character count: 1192 Explain Explain...

1. Anna Kegler “The Sugarcoated Language Of White Fragility”

Draft 1 by Stephanie Church Submission date: 15-Apr-2021 10:13AM (UTC-0700) Submission ID: 1560127135 File name: Document_38.docx (12.59K) Word count: 250 Character count: 1192 Explain Explain Intro specific Rhetorical Question Explain 0% SIMILARITY INDEX 0% INTERNET SOURCES 0% PUBLICATIONS 0% STUDENT PAPERS Exclude quotes On Exclude bibliography On Exclude matches Off Draft 1 ORIGINALITY REPORT PRIMARY SOURCES QM QM QM QM QM FINAL GRADE 73/100 Draft 1 GRADEMARK REPORT GENERAL COMMENTS Instructor PAGE 1 Explain Explaining this more would help the reader understand what you mean, and likely help you develop your own ideas more.  Additional Comment Kegler also think the phrase "white fragility" is protecting white people's feelings.  Explain Explaining this more would help the reader understand what you mean, and likely help you develop your own ideas more.  Additional Comment the connotations of these different phrases are an important part of the argument and need to be explained more Intro This intro paragraph should tell the reader all the major things you're going to discuss in the paper. specific try to be more specific here. what exactly do you mean? Rhetorical Question it's better to not use questions like this because you can't rely on the reader to answer them as you expect QM Explain Explaining this more would help the reader understand what you mean, and likely help you develop your own ideas more.  RUBRIC: ZANE PAPER RUBRIC CONTENT A B C D F ORGANIZATION A B C D F CLARITY A B C D   C Fully responds to the prompt. Accurately represents content of course texts. Discussion indicates careful thought. Apt use of examples. Responds directly to prompt. Accurately represents content of course texts. May miss one or two major points. Discussion indicates some careful thought. Occasional apt use of examples. Ignores some major part of the prompt. Inaccurately represents main ideas of readings. Discussion is confused or superficial. Few if any use of examples. Ignores major parts of the prompt. Inaccurately represents main ideas of readings. Little to no discussion or explanation of ideas. No use of examples. Fails to address prompt. Inaccurately represents main ideas of readings. No discussion or explanation of ideas. C Introduction explains all major points of the paper. Each paragraphed discusses one specific idea. Paragraphs are organized well. Introduction explains most major points. Each paragraph is roughly about one idea. Paper is, for the most part, organized well. Introduction explains little of the paper. Paragraphs discuss multiple major ideas. Paper is disorganized with little attempt at transitions. No introduction. Ideas not grouped into paragraphs. Paper is disorganized and lacks transitions. No introduction or sensical paragraphs. B No unnecessary repetition or overly complex sentences. All technical terms are defined. Words are carefully chosen. Few, if any, typos or grammatical errors. Little unnecessary repetition or overly complex sentences. Few undefined technical terms. Some imprecise word choice. Some typos or grammatical errors. Unnecessary repetition or overly complex sentences. Many undefined technical terms. Continued imprecise word choice. Distracting typos and grammatical errors. A lot of unnecessary repetition and/or unnecessarily complex sentences. Most technical terms left undefined. Confusing word choice. Typos and grammatical errors make many sentences difficult to read. F Prose is generally very difficult or impossible to follow. Typos and grammatical errors make many sentences very difficult to read.