An implied-in-fact contract is just as much a contract as any other enforceable agreement. In this case, the court could have substituted its interpretation of the facts for the view of the district...

An implied-in-fact contract is just as much a contract as any other enforceable agreement. In this case, the court could have substituted its interpretation of the facts for the view of the district court. It chose not to do so in deference to the district court.

1. What is the issue in this case? Clue: What is the question about which the parties are disagreeing?

2. What must the court have found for it to decide to overrule the district court? Clue: How would a clear meeting of the minds about how Fox was to have been compensated have changed this decision?