American Tort Law" Please respond to the following: From the first e-Activity, explain whether BP’s actions were intentional or negligent and discuss how you arrived at your conclusion. ...

1 answer below »

American Tort Law" Please respond to the following:




  • From the first e-Activity, explain whether BP’s actions were intentional or negligent and discuss how you arrived at your conclusion.



http://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6375&context=lalrev




  • At issue in the case Labriola v. Pollard Group Inc. from the second e-Activity is consideration for the formation of a contract when an employee, already employed by the employer, executes a non-compete agreement but receives no new benefit and the employer incurs no further obligations. Articulate the highlights of this argument and how it affects Labriola’s future employment possibilities.



http://caselaw.findlaw.com/wa-supreme-court/1090272.html


Answered Same DayMay 11, 2021

Answer To: American Tort Law" Please respond to the following: From the first e-Activity, explain whether BP’s...

Preeti answered on May 14 2021
137 Votes
Running Head: DISCUSSION
Case Analysis & Discuss
ion
First e-activity
The wrongful act of a person with an intention to harm safety of some other person is an intentional tort. However, when the wrongful act takes place on account of ignorance of a person it is a negligent tort. It was identified by the court that there was gross negligence and willful misconduct on the part of BP leading to biggest offshore oil spill disaster. It was identified in the post disaster survey that the biggest disaster of 2010 was caused due to ignorance of BP. It was found that BP was already aware that there was no enough cement between production casing and...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here