According to Jensen (2001), “Corporate budgeting is a joke and everyone knows it. It consumes a huge...

Question

According to Jensen (2001), “Corporate budgeting is a joke and everyone knows it. It consumes a huge amount of executives' time, forcing them into endless rounds of dull meetings and tense negotiations. It encourages managers to lie and cheat, lowballing targets and inflating results, and it penalizes them for telling the truth. It turns business decisions into elaborate exercises in gaming. It sets colleague against colleague, creating distrust and ill will. And it distorts incentives, motivating people to act in ways that run counter to the best interests of their companies”.

During the late 1980s, academics such as Johnson and Kaplan (1987) argued that standard costing and variance analysis were inadequate for cost control and performance evaluation purpose due to the changing competitive environment.

Required:

Discuss the relevance of traditional budgeting and standard costing in the contemporary business environment.

Starting point for your research:

Your text

2-papers posted on your Moodle

· Jensen (2001)

· Hope and Fraser (2003).

110 BUACC5933, Assignment, Sem1-2019 BUACC5933, Assignment, Sem1-2019 BUACC5933 Cost and Management Accounting Semester 1, 2019 Assignment According to Jensen (2001), “Corporate budgeting is a joke and everyone knows it. It consumes a huge amount of executives' time, forcing them into endless rounds of dull meetings and tense negotiations. It encourages managers to lie and cheat, lowballing targets and inflating results, and it penalizes them for telling the truth. It turns business decisions into elaborate exercises in gaming. It sets colleague against colleague, creating distrust and ill will. And it distorts incentives, motivating people to act in ways that run counter to the best interests of their companies”. During the late 1980s, academics such as Johnson and Kaplan (1987) argued that standard costing and variance analysis were inadequate for cost control and performance evaluation purpose due to the changing competitive environment. Required: Discuss the relevance of traditional budgeting and standard costing in the contemporary business environment. Starting point for your research: Your text 2-papers posted on your Moodle · Jensen (2001) · Hope and Fraser (2003). Additional information: · Required format: Essay (Around 2000 words) · Useful links: · http://federation.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/190044/General-Guide-to-Writing-and-Study-Skills.pdf · https://federation.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/313328/FEDUNI-GENERAL-GUIDE-TO-REFERENCING-2016-EDITION_ed.pdf · This is a group-assignment. Each group needs to have 2 to 3 members in it. Please organise yourselves into groups. · Please make sure that names and ID numbers of all group members are stated on the cover sheet of your submission. As this is a group assignment, each member of your group is awarded the same mark. Working in groups has its pros and cons. I am sure that you will hold constructive group discussions. In case of any disagreements, you will be able to resolve them in a reasonable way. There will be times when you may have to agree to disagree with each other. Invariably different group members bring different skills to a project; it is up to you to make the best of it. I believe one can learn a lot by discussing the issues with one’s colleagues. If you find your group members are “not pulling their weight” or there are problems with any member’s commitment, then please try to resolve those issues amongst yourselves. Open and honest communication always helps. If you are unable to resolve these issues, you are most welcome to see me and we will try to sort out the problems together. Do this as soon as possible and certainly before the due date. For some reason, if you do not wish to work in a group, please let us know. Please adapt this to suit your style. Thanks Geeta -------------------------- · BUACC5933 – Cost and Management Accounting · Semester 1, 2019 Group Assignment Names:Student Numbers: Bases of assessment F P HD Content - Identification of relevant issues. Research - Selection of relevant material. A demonstration of critical evaluation of the material. Expression of your viewpoint (and not a catalogue of quotes/ others’ ideas). Expression - clarity, style (formal and academic), coherence in writing, grammar, punctuation, spellings and sentence structure. A logical flow of argument at both the paragraph level and the overall text level. Use of supporting arguments. Use of literature to support the argument. Structure – Synopsis (Stated the topic, reflected main arguments and identified conclusions reached). Introduction (Provided background/contextual information; clearly introduced the topic; outlined the plan for addressing the topic). Discussion in appropriately linked sections and paragraphs. Conclusion (no new material; reiterated the main line of argument). Referencing procedure (within the text, and at the end of the text). Appropriately styled and punctuated bibliography. Overall Presentation – including cover page, line spacing, page numbering. GRADE: 1 2

buacc5933-assignment-sem-1-2019-1-o0uahtx3.docx

Aarti J · Accepted Answer

Relevance of traditional budgeting and standard costing in the contemporary business environment
Course Name
Course Date
Student’s Name
Relevance of traditional budgeting and standard costing in the contemporary business environment
Introduction
In the current business environment, the companies faces intense competition and the companies focus on various aspects like cost practices, budgeting and other information which helps in decision making, 
Corporate budgeting is one of the aspects which is highly used by the companies. Incorporating budgeting is not easy for the organizations as it requires lot of time of the executives and negotiations between the employees and the managers. Because of the budgeting, some of the managers also tend to manipulate the results so that the results are able to match up with the budgets. It also creates grudges between the employees and also lead to distorted results. As given in the case study, so as to meet the target, the sales team shipped unfinished goods to the employees so as to record the sales and earn the bonus, and the company then had to arrange for the warehouse as well as the additional labor to get the goods finished. This lead to the decrease in the overall profit of the company because of the additional costs that the company took to finish their unfinished goods. These kind of decisions do lead to the distorted decisions.
As per Jensen, (2001), ‘Traditional budgeting process is merely waste of time which leads to distorted decisions and turn honest managers intro schemers. It doesn’t have to be the way – if you’re willing to sever the ties between budgets and compensation”.
Standard Costing
Standard costing is the costing where the company sets the standard for each operations and then compare the actual performance of the company with the standard performance of the company. The standard costing also focus on analysing and reporting the variances which has been the result of the standard and the actual performance and then the variance is investigated. 
The standard costing is suited for the organization which has repetitive activities, majorly by the manufacturing companies which has repetitive production process. Standard costing does not apply on the non-repetitive activities or the company indulged in non-repetitive activities. 
Standard costing has been criticized over the period of time, and has been said to be inflexible, motivating extra production and also failing to provide meaningful information on the timely basis. Many people have termed standard costing as an outdated process and technique. 
Few authors have also argued and said that traditional standard costing and variance analyses fail to provide relevant information on costs, which changes with the change in the number of goods produced. Traditional standard costing and variance analyses have stated to have severe limitations when used to analyze overhead costs. As the importance of the overhead costs increases, the limitations related to the standard costing as well as variance costing increased. 
Traditional Budgeting
Budgets have played a major role over a period of time and has been an important part of the business environment since 1920 and has always been considered as key driver and evaluators of the managerial performance of the business and also an important part for the planning and control. 
Budget are the tools which can help the company in developing different financial plans which can help in obtaining different results and also focus on obtaining and facilitating the control environment as well as improved management policies. (Don R. Hansen and Maryanne M. Mowen, 2002)
It has been a tool which has helped in analysing the financial performance of the company as well as the performance of different departments, divisions as well as individuals. With the budgeting,

According to Jensen (2001), “Corporate budgeting is a joke and everyone knows it. It consumes a huge amount of executives' time, forcing them into endless rounds of dull meetings and tense...

Answer To: According to Jensen (2001), “Corporate budgeting is a joke and everyone knows it. It consumes a huge...

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment