According to James, it is not wrong to rely on our passional nature to make decisions when the options are living, forced, momentous, and cannot by their nature be decided on intellectual grounds. Why...

According to James, it is not wrong to rely on our passional nature to make decisions when the options are living, forced, momentous, and cannot by their nature be decided on intellectual grounds. Why does James claim it is legitimate to base decisions on our passional nature when they have these four features, but it is not legitimate when decisions lack one of these four features? Do you think James is right?