Academic Style 1 APA 7 referencing in-text and correctly formatted reference.

Assessment 1 Template Standard

Please complete the following table. You should list FIVE factors and consider how they might similarly or differently affect human belonging in the different types of relationships (family, romantic and friendship relationships). I have completed the first line for you as an example using the factor of physical contact.

Your completed responses should not exceed 500 words and please do remember to use references for any primary and secondary citations.

Assessment 1 Template Standard Please complete the following table. You should list FIVE factors and consider how they might similarly or differently affect human belonging in the different types of relationships (family, romantic and friendship relationships). I have completed the first line for you as an example using the factor of physical contact. Your completed responses should not exceed 500 words and please do remember to use references for any primary and secondary citations. FAMILIES ROMANCES FRIENDSHIPS Physical interaction Families which physically interact more frequently will enhance a sense of belonging. Kraut et al. (1998) showed that families which did not interact as much physically and spent longer periods online began to lose their sense of belonging. Essential to create a sense of physical connectedness, flirting and a sense of being desired. All feed into feeling as if one belongs with another person. Zajonc (1968) shows that frequent interactions with others can enhance liking and a sense of belonging. Example Summary: Physical interaction acts similar for friendships and romances in that people need to see one another frequently to feel as if they belong to them or groups. Stronger in romances than in Families. But stronger in families than in friendships. But physical interaction is also likely different across the different types of interactions. Types of physical interaction also plays a role – intimate contact most important in romantic relationships. FAMILIES ROMANCES FRIENDSHIPS Factor 1: Factor 1 Summary: Factor 2: Factor 2 Summary: Factor 3: Factor 3 Summary: Factor 4: Factor 4 Summary: Factor 5: Factor 5 Summary: Complete a 500-word consideration and comparison of the role of belonging in relation to family, romantic and friendship relationships Have you ever wondered what psychological features play a role in all your relationships? This module will help you unpick the different types of relationships humans hold; those between two, a few, and a large group of people. You will explore what role individual characteristics play in who you choose as a life partner, a friend or even a frenemy. You will use historical and modern theories to explore the differences between friendships, romantic relationships and group dynamics as well as exploring how humans move these relationships between online and offline spaces. Looking at modern applied social interaction theories, you will consider the human need to belong across all types of relationship in general. You will also learn how to apply theories to more specific types of relationships such as those within a sports team. Additionally , the module will offer you the experience of collecting and analysing data in order to complete coursework that integrates some of the theoretical conceptualisations taught on the module. Exploring inter-relational facets of human relationships alongside dilemmas such as loneliness and social isolation, on completion of this module, you will have gained a critical understanding of how relationships are made, maintained and dissolved, and how psychology researchers are able to advance and inform our understanding of these processes through research. 1.1 Appropriately outlined with clear examples for each type of relationship. 1.2 Summary of similarities and differences included. 2.1 Appropriately outlined with clear examples for each type of relationship. 2,2 Summary of similarities and differences included. 3,1 Appropriately outlined with clear examples for each type of relationship. 3,2 Summary of similarities and differences included. 4,1 Appropriately outlined with clear examples for each type of relationship. 4,2 Summary of similarities and differences included. 5,1 Appropriately outlined with clear examples for each type of relationship. 5.2 Summary of similarities and differences included. General 1 Statements backed up with relevant research/citations. General 2 Clear lines of comparison evident for all three factors. General 3 Evidence of critical thinking. General 4 Evidence of reading beyond lecture content. Academic Style 1 APA 7 referencing in-text and correctly formatted reference list. Academic Style 2 Well-written and articulated responses Academic Style 3 Word count not exceeded. Module Assessment 1 Feedback Form 7PS035 Module Assessment 1 Feedback Form Student Number: Marker: Grade: The information provided in this form is specific to the mid-module assessment (assessment 1) on the Psychology of Social Interaction module. Each component is indicative of performance on the assessment criteria and the overall grade awarded might differ slightly to that indicated by boxes checked. Grading criteria are attached for reference only. Your in-text references do count towards your word count, but the reference list is not included in the word count. Complete Incomplete Standard correctly completed with three factors for three types of relationship. Distinction Commendation Pass Fail Factor 1: Appropriately outlined with clear examples for each type of relationship. Factor 1 summary of similarities and differences included. Factor 2: Appropriately outlined with clear examples for each type of relationship. Factor 2 summary of similarities and differences included. Factor 3: Appropriately outlined with clear examples for each type of relationship. Factor 3 summary of similarities and differences included. Distinction Commendation Pass Fail Factor 4: Appropriately outlined with clear examples for each type of relationship. Factor 4 summary of similarities and differences included. Factor 5: Appropriately outlined with clear examples for each type of relationship. Factor 5 summary of similarities and differences included. General Statements backed up with relevant research/citations Clear lines of comparison evident for all three factors Evidence of critical thinking Evidence of reading beyond lecture content Academic Style APA 7 referencing in-text and correctly formatted reference list Well-written and articulated responses Word count not exceeded Additional Comments: DISTINCTION COMMENDATION PASS FAIL Outstanding: 95 Excellent: 85 Very good: 75, 77 Good: 62, 65, 68 Clear Pass: 52, 55, 58 Marginal Fail: 48, 45, 42 Clear Fail: 38, 35, 32, 25 Little or Nothing of Merit: 10, 0 The assessed work will demonstrate: The assessed work will demonstrate: The assessed work will demonstrate: Work of insufficient quality to achieve a Pass standard. ‘Fail’ grade work may suffer from some or all the following issues: • An in-depth and systematic conceptual understanding of the topic • Independent thought, rather than relying simply on the ideas of others, perhaps as contained in the prescribed reading of the module • Reading beyond that specified by the module author, reflecting a broad literature review, where appropriate • Reading with a critical understanding • Ability to evaluate theoretical concepts and draw appropriate conclusions • Where appropriate, reflective and critical application / integration of theoretical concepts to empirical and practical issues • A good conceptual understanding of the topic • That all the key elements of the question set will have been addressed • Some evidence of independent thought rather than relying simply on the ideas of others, perhaps as contained in the prescribed reading of the module • Evidence of reading beyond that specified by the module guide • Evidence of a good grasp of prescribed literature • An ability to evaluate theoretical concepts and draw appropriate conclusions • An ability to apply theoretical concepts to empirical and practical issues • Satisfactory conceptual understanding of the topic • That some of the key elements of the question set will have been addressed • Some evidence of independent thought rather than relying simply on the ideas of others, perhaps as contained in the prescribed reading of the module • Some familiarity with, and satisfactory understanding of, prescribed literature • Some evidence of application of theoretical concepts to empirical and practical issues, and integrating theory and practice • PASS grade work may suffer from some or all the following issues: • Achievement of very few/none of the module learning outcomes • Completely fails to address the question set (e.g., student has written at length about the wrong topic) • Token or no attempt to integrate theory and practice • Little or no understanding of theoretical and empirical considerations • Little or no reference to appropriate literature • Little or no evidence that the student has grasped key ideas • Unduly descriptive and/or lacks analysis • Badly presented • References largely incomplete and not consistent with Psychology Subject Group guidelines DISTINCTION COMMENDATION PASS FAIL • An ability to analyse and synthesise information presenting material using structured, logical discussion and critical argument • Clarity and conciseness, well- constructed and articulate writing that will be presented to a high standard using academic/professional language • APA (7th Ed.) Referencing • Clarity and conciseness, well- constructed and articulate writing that will be presented to a high standard using academic / professional language • Accurate and consistent use of the appropriate referencing system • Clear and concise written expression • Reference complete and consistent with Psychology Subject Group guidelines o Inclusion of some materials not directly relevant to the set question o Providing an incomplete answer to the set question o Weaknesses in structure or in clarity o Some errors in referencing in terms of the use of the appropriate referencing system and/or consistency • An assessment offence has been committed • Is submitted in contravention of University submission regulations 7PS035 Module Assessment 1 Feedback Form