Absenteeism can be a serious employment problem. It is estimated that absenteeism reduces potential output by more than 10%. Two economists launched a research project to learn more about the problem....

Absenteeism can be a serious employment problem.  It is estimated that absenteeism reduces potential output by more than 10%.  Two economists launched a research project to learn more about the problem.  They randomly selected 100 organizations to participate in a 1-year study.  For each organization, they recorded the average number of days absent per employee and several variables thought to affect absenteeism.

Perform a two-sample t-test analysis to determine if the availability of shiftwork significantly influences absenteeism. I have provided the F-test for two variances below:

Copy and paste the Two sample t-test output below (Please let me know how I can get the two sample t-test output in Excel, I do not need the copied version) AND provide a clear conclusion supported by key statistics in the output about how absenteeism is affected by the availability of shiftwork.

Data:

Wage	Pct PT	Pct U	Av Shift	U/M Rel	Absent
22477	8.5	57.1	1	1	5.4
29939	1.9	41.5	0	1	4.1
22957	12.2	52.6	1	0	11.5
18888	30.8	65.1	0	1	2.1
15078	6.8	68.8	0	1	5.9
15481	5.1	46.4	0	0	12.9
21481	25.3	38.9	0	1	3.5
29687	9.2	17.2	0	0	2.6
13603	8.4	12.9	0	0	8.6
18303	4.9	18.1	0	1	2.7
20832	23.8	64.4	1	1	6.6
22325	24.1	63.7	1	1	2.1
19964	8.6	12.2	0	1	3.8
32496	5.9	11.8	1	0	4.3
15795	2.9	25.8	0	1	4.3
21138	24.3	53.2	0	0	2.2
18859	20.6	22.8	1	1	8.6
12023	9	49.8	1	1	10.8
33272	24	39.1	1	0	2.9
22325	11.9	32.6	1	0	5.3
26147	0	67.7	1	0	8.2
33229	11.7	10.8	0	0	2.8
37970	14.6	25.5	1	1	2.4
15281	27.2	31.8	0	0	2.8
19423	17.2	35	1	1	5
26587	13.9	41.9	1	1	9.5
22963	2.6	52.9	0	1	4.3
26404	6.4	64.4	0	1	8.9
16315	4.9	69.7	0	1	7.2
26759	23.2	61.8	1	1	5.6
30824	13.2	52.1	0	1	2.4
31979	27.7	57.4	1	1	2.7
23135	7	15.2	0	0	13.4
18014	0	38.7	1	0	14.8
18541	13.8	69.4	1	1	10.7
16747	9.9	67.2	1	0	10.3
13473	6.3	47.8	0	1	4.6
42986	13.4	24.5	1	0	3.9
23964	8.8	79.4	1	0	13.3
30794	0.4	12.1	1	0	2.2
21104	14.7	71	0	1	5.7
19137	7.7	28	1	0	11.8
26058	7.3	45.6	0	1	2.5
22085	6.8	25.4	0	1	2.1
29044	8.6	40.6	0	0	4.1
24205	19.6	25.1	1	1	4.9
17698	10.8	42.3	1	1	7.7
26399	4.5	63.3	1	1	6.3
40590	15.9	69.4	1	1	2.9
24805	5.7	17.7	1	1	2.6
18899	13.1	54.8	1	1	6.1
26802	15.5	46.5	0	1	6
30034	11.8	53.2	1	0	6.7
15713	16.6	41.2	1	0	11.9
18280	6.4	65	1	1	9.3
41009	6.7	54.9	0	1	3.6
24021	14	20.6	1	1	2.6
21836	27.6	29	0	1	2.1
21157	5.5	50.2	1	1	9
19529	14.5	56.6	1	0	11
31240	26.3	36.4	1	1	2.9
20963	0	0	1	1	2.2
33826	8.2	87.9	0	1	3.3
23349	0	38.5	1	1	5.9
22695	25.4	47	1	1	4
30475	0	69.3	1	0	10.8
16631	5.9	48.2	1	1	7.1
28996	18.6	29.3	1	1	2.9
15807	16.9	42.9	1	1	6.2
15585	0	59.4	1	0	10.3
18466	9	69.4	1	0	13.5
35140	21.1	37.1	1	1	6.7
33459	14.1	19.5	1	1	2.6
24357	0	21.5	1	1	5.2
19370	3.7	35	1	1	7.2
21820	6.3	0	1	1	3.5
23351	12.3	27.1	1	1	5.4
22938	6.8	68.5	1	1	5.8
16477	10	61.5	1	1	11.7
20790	28.5	59.9	1	0	5.6
20352	19.4	34.6	1	0	4.6
19743	14.3	39.7	1	0	8.6
22775	10.3	35.7	1	1	2.1
24229	0.9	26.7	1	0	9.6
41195	8.6	66.7	1	0	4
23143	4.2	63.1	0	1	10.6
13400	28.1	46.7	0	0	5.8
21371	14.9	78.9	1	0	7.4
28675	7.7	63.4	0	0	10.3
18171	6.9	47.9	0	1	6.3
23670	20.5	46.3	1	1	6.7
29745	6.1	53.9	1	0	6.7
14672	13.9	46	1	0	13.3
20382	0	38.6	1	1	4.1
24952	14.6	53.8	0	1	4.6
28878	7.4	12.2	1	1	2.7
24558	24.5	37	1	1	8
20447	0.9	27.4	1	1	4.2
27714	8.7	58.1	0	0	9
18116	3.5	47.5	1	1	7.7

Extracted text: Column 1, Wage: Average employee wage Column 2, Pct PT: Percentage of part-time employees Column 3, Pct U : Percentage of unionized employees Column 4: Av Shift : Availability of shiftwork 1= Yes 0 = No Column 5: U/M Rel : Union-management relationship 1= good 0 = Not good Column 6: Absent: Average number of days absent per employee


Extracted text: F-Test Two-Sample for Variances Av Shift No Av Shift Yes Mean 5.306060606 6.688059701 Variance 10.03871212 11.39621891 Observations 33 67 df 32 66 F 0.880880949 P(F<=f) one-tail f critical one-tail 0.353597115 0.586875931 one-tail="" f="" critical="" one-tail="" 0.353597115="">