A researcher plans to run an fMRI study looking at neural networks predicting consciousness. While reviewing the informed consent with the participant, he waves his hand over the “Potential Risks”...

A researcher plans to run an fMRI study looking at neural networks predicting consciousness. While reviewing the informed consent with the participant, he waves his hand over the “Potential Risks” section, says that everything is basically safe, there’s nothing to worry about, and the research team will be in control the whole time. He then continues on with the remainder of the consent form and has the participant sign the form to continue with study participation.
What ethical principles of the Belmont Report are being ignored here and how?