A recent newspaper article claims that 69% of car accidents involve some evidence of distracted driving. A police officer questions this claim, and pulls a random sample of 98 accident reports. If 71 of them involve distracted driving, is this enough evidence to show that the proportion of car accidents involve some evidence of distracted driving issignificantly greater than than reported by the newspaper? (Use αα=0.10) The null and alternative hypotheses would be:
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here