A mind map is a conceptual tool used to represent and organise knowledge. In this unit we will be using mind maps to organise information about a group that are either commencing palliative care or...

1 answer below »

A mind map is a conceptual tool used to represent and organise knowledge. In this unit we will be using mind maps to organise information about a group that are either commencing palliative care or end-of-life stage. The purpose is to show that you can make the relevant connections between concepts to show your broad understanding of the group during palliation/end of life care that you are focusing on. Please choose one group from the following list to focus on:



  • Children (Age group between 1 – 16)

  • Young Adults (Age group between 18 – 29)

  • Adults (Age group between 30 – 50)

  • Older Adults (Age group >65)


Please use the steps below to complete your mind map and summary of the chosen group.



  1. Please make your map as unique and creative as you like but remember to still make sure it can be clearly understood and meets the requirements on the assessment rubric below.

  2. You can undertake your map using a computer or paper and pen. If you use paper this will need to be scanned then uploaded to Canvas so make sure it is readable.

  3. To begin the map, write a central concept in the middle, this will be your chosen group (children, young, adults, older). This will be the focal point for your map and most connections will be made with this central concept

  4. Include who is in the map, any relevant support services.These concepts should be represented on your map surrounding the central concept. Remember to check the rubric.

  5. Connect each concept, with a line to the central concept, to create a map. You may wish to use colour coding to represent different concept groups. i.e red represents services, blue represents interventions.

  6. On the lines linking the concepts write a label. This label should describe how the concepts relate to each other or the relationship that the two concepts have. E.g. identify why an at home palliative care nurse would be necessary to the care of a child at the end of life stage. This process continues until all concepts appear on the map and all lines have descriptions.

  7. You can include extra connecting lines, to other concepts, the lines are not restricted to the main concept (your group). There may be multiple lines coming from one concept to other concepts.

  8. Once your map is completed you will need to write a short summary of your map, this should be between 600 - 800 words. This should identify your group, explain any colour coding, structure or how you have organised the map or other representation on your map that might require explanation. E.g. support services are represented in blue and on the outside of the map as they are the support for this group. In the summary you will also need to include a brief summary explaining who is in the map, how this is represented and any justifications or explanations and why.

  9. No references are required on the map however can be included in the summary paragraph. Abibliography list must be provided to acknowledge where your information was sourced.



NUR30001 - Mind Map AssignmentNUR30001 - Mind Map Assignment















































CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomePresentation of written summary (5 marks)Submission follows SUT requirements. Accurate spelling, grammar, punctuation
Cohesive writing within word limit










5.0to >3.0PtsHigh Distinction 100-80Fluent writing style. Grammar and spelling accurate. Evidence of a cohesive piece of writing that succinctly described the mind map.3.0to >2.5PtsCredit 69-60Language mainly clear and fluent. Grammar and spelling overall accurate. Describes mind map but not cohesively2.5to >2.0PtsPass 59-50Meaning apparent but language not always fluent or clear. Grammar and/or spelling contains errors. Basic description of the mind map.2.0to >0PtsFail >50Meaning unclear and/ grammar and spelling contain frequent errors.

5.0pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeMind Map presentation (10 marks)Organised
Related to written summary
Creative presentation











10.0to >7.0PtsHigh Distinction 100-80Neat, legible, polished & imaginative approach to the presentation of the mind map. Seamless links to the written summary. Carefully and logically organised mind map.7.0to >6.0PtsDistinction 79-70Carefully organised mind map. Clear links to the written summary. Shows a creative approach to the mind map. Clear writing, easy to read.6.0to >5.0PtsCredit 69-60Mostly well organised map with clear coherence to written summary. Show attempts to creatively present the mind map. Writing readable.5.0to >4.0PtsPass 59-50Shows some attempt to organise in a logical manner and relate to written summary. Map is basic in presentation, lacks creativity. In places writing is messy.4.0to >0PtsFail >50Disorganised mind map. Poor or no relation to written summary. Poorly presented. Messy or illegible writing.

10.0pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomePalliative Care considerations (20 marks)The demographics of chosen group and specific palliative care considerations. From a holistic perspective this may include considerations of individual, family, community, their environment. Inclusion of linkages and relationship to group










20.0to >15.0PtsHigh Distinction 100-80Clear and comprehensive identification of demographics of the chosen group. Clear and comprehensive inclusion of specific palliative care considerations related to the demographic group chosen. Accurate links between all concepts. Succinct, accurate & relevant description of relationships between concepts.15.0to >14.0PtsDistinction 79-70Clear identification of demographics. of chosen group. Clear inclusion of inclusion of specific palliative care considerations related to the demographic group chosen. . Accurate links between concepts. Accurate & relevant relationships between concepts.14.0to >12.0PtsCredit 69-60Mostly accurate demographics. Mostly appropriate inclusion of specific palliative care considerations related to the demographic group chosen. . Mostly accurate links between concepts. Mostly accurate & relevant relationships between concepts.12.0to >9.0PtsPass 59-50Some inaccurate or missing demographics. Inclusion of inclusion of specific palliative care considerations related to the demographic group chosen, but not always clear. Some inaccurate or missing links between concepts. Some inaccurate or missing description of relationships between concepts.9.0to >0PtsFail >50Inaccurate or no representation of demographics. Inaccurate or no of inclusion of specific palliative care considerations related to the demographic group chosen. Inaccurate or no links between concepts. Poor or irrelevant description of relationships between concepts.

20.0pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeInterventions for client and family (20 marks)Interventions may include symptom management or complimentary therapies.
Connection between concepts and group with relevant explanation











20.0to >15.0PtsHigh Distinction 100-80Clear and comprehensive connections between concept to concept and concepts to chosen group. Includes comprehensive and relevant explanation related to interventions for client and family.15.0to >14.0PtsDistinction 79-70Clear connections between concept to concept and concepts to chosen group. Includes clear and relevant explanation related to interventions for client and family.14.0to >12.0PtsCredit 69-60Brief connections between concept to concept and concepts to chosen group. Brief explanation related to interventions for client and family.12.0to >9.0PtsPass 59-50Limited connections between concept to concept and concepts to chosen group. Limited explanation related to interventions for client and family.9.0to >0PtsFail >50Unclear or no connections between concept to concept and concepts to chosen group. Unclear or no explanation related to interventions for client and family.

20.0pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeSupport services for the client and familyIdentify the support services for the client and family. These may include palliative care nurses visits; psychological counselling. Connections between the group with relevant explanation










20.0to >15.0PtsHigh Distinction 100-80Clear and comprehensive connections between concept to concept and concepts to chosen group. Includes comprehensive and relevant explanation related to support services for client and family.15.0to >14.0PtsDistinctionconnections between concept to concept and concepts to chosen group. Includes clear and relevant explanation related to support services for client and family.14.0to >12.0PtsCreditBrief connections between concept to concept and concepts to chosen group. Brief explanation related to support services for client and family12.0to >9.0PtsPassLimited connections between concept to concept and concepts to chosen group. Limited explanation related to support services for client and family.9.0to >0PtsFail >50Unclear or no connections between concept to concept and concepts to chosen group. Unclear or no explanation related to support services for client and family.

20.0pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeWritten summary (20 marks)Description of your group and map. Explanation of organisation and representation in your map.
Explanation of nursing interventions.











20.0to >15.0PtsHigh Distinction 100-80A polished and succinct description of map & group. Clearly able to follow explanation and organisation of the mind map. Comprehensive explanation of nursing interventions.15.0to >14.0PtsDistinction 79-70Carefully described map & group. Clear organisation of the map. Clear explanation of nursing interventions.14.0to >12.0PtsCredit 69-60Mostly well-described map & group. A clear representation of the map. Minimal unclear explanations. Nursing interventions explained.12.0to >9.0PtsPass 59-50Shows some attempt to describe the map & group and relate to the organisation on the map. In places difficult to see the connection with the map. Brief explanation of nursing interventions.9.0to >0PtsFail >50Poor description of map and group. No or unclear explanation of mind map organisation and nursing interventions.

20.0pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeReferencing (5 marks)Follows APA style
(7th ed.). Use of
broad range of
literature.
References no earlier than 2010 to ensure
up to date.










5.0to >3.0PtsHigh Distinction 100-80Wide range (5) and high-quality sources which have been accurately included in accordance with APA style (7th ed.) No errors in reference list.3.0PtsCredit 69-60Adequate number of sources (5) relevant to the subject; does not go beyond the core literature outlined in the unit. Mostly adheres to APA style (7th ed.) with repeated errors in a reference list.3.0to >2.0PtsNo descriptionMinimal use of literature sources (2.0to >0PtsFail >50Either no evidence of literature being consulted or use of an irrelevant, old or very small number of sources. Omission or major errors in a reference list.

5.0pts

Total points:100.0




Answered Same DayOct 07, 2021NUR30001Swinburne University of Technology

Answer To: A mind map is a conceptual tool used to represent and organise knowledge. In this unit we will be...

Karishma answered on Oct 18 2021
151 Votes
Mind map for children for relevant support services

Introduction to mind mapping
Mind mapping is a process of establishing information in a stru
cture which helps understand the relationships, associations and connections between keywords to reflect an idea, thought, theory or even a process. Mind mapping consists of a central idea, keywords and association along with the usage of lines for association. This helps build a mind map which can help reflect the thought effectively. The mind map created is for palliative care for adults suffering from life threatening diseases which are chronic and would require palliative care. It is important for the creation of effective resources as well as building a process where the situation can be taken care of (Folkman, S.; Moskowitz, J., 2012).
Mind map for palliative care for an adult
The mind map has been formed using adults as the central idea as it is related to palliative care for adults suffering from a chronic disease. There are several actors or people and parties involved in this case which include the patient and his family, the health care institution employees, caregivers, associations like insurance and government, all of which work in tandem through direct or indirect involvement for treating the patient (Hotzy, Florian; Jaeger, Matthias, 2016). Cancer is an extremely deadly disease and as of yet there is no substantial drug that has been known to cure all kinds of cancers and it has been a painful experience for patients to go through the chemotherapy which is the only way in which cancer is cured, not completely, but only to a certain extent. This report aims at analyzing how information is being communicated with regard to cancer and its treatment based on a mind map.
The second element is the situation. This involves an understanding about how there palliative care environment is extremely important and how resource settings can help create an effective care unit for the patient. It also explains how the policies of the care unit and health...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here