This criterion is linked to a learning outcomePresentation of written summary (5 marks)Submission follows SUT requirements. Accurate spelling, grammar, punctuation Cohesive writing within word limit |
5.0to >3.0PtsHigh Distinction 100-80Fluent writing style. Grammar and spelling accurate. Evidence of a cohesive piece of writing that succinctly described the mind map. |
3.0to >2.5PtsCredit 69-60Language mainly clear and fluent. Grammar and spelling overall accurate. Describes mind map but not cohesively |
2.5to >2.0PtsPass 59-50Meaning apparent but language not always fluent or clear. Grammar and/or spelling contains errors. Basic description of the mind map. |
2.0to >0PtsFail >50Meaning unclear and/ grammar and spelling contain frequent errors. |
|
5.0pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeMind Map presentation (10 marks)Organised Related to written summary Creative presentation |
10.0to >7.0PtsHigh Distinction 100-80Neat, legible, polished & imaginative approach to the presentation of the mind map. Seamless links to the written summary. Carefully and logically organised mind map. |
7.0to >6.0PtsDistinction 79-70Carefully organised mind map. Clear links to the written summary. Shows a creative approach to the mind map. Clear writing, easy to read. |
6.0to >5.0PtsCredit 69-60Mostly well organised map with clear coherence to written summary. Show attempts to creatively present the mind map. Writing readable. |
5.0to >4.0PtsPass 59-50Shows some attempt to organise in a logical manner and relate to written summary. Map is basic in presentation, lacks creativity. In places writing is messy. |
4.0to >0PtsFail >50Disorganised mind map. Poor or no relation to written summary. Poorly presented. Messy or illegible writing. |
|
10.0pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomePalliative Care considerations (20 marks)The demographics of chosen group and specific palliative care considerations. From a holistic perspective this may include considerations of individual, family, community, their environment. Inclusion of linkages and relationship to group |
20.0to >15.0PtsHigh Distinction 100-80Clear and comprehensive identification of demographics of the chosen group. Clear and comprehensive inclusion of specific palliative care considerations related to the demographic group chosen. Accurate links between all concepts. Succinct, accurate & relevant description of relationships between concepts. |
15.0to >14.0PtsDistinction 79-70Clear identification of demographics. of chosen group. Clear inclusion of inclusion of specific palliative care considerations related to the demographic group chosen. . Accurate links between concepts. Accurate & relevant relationships between concepts. |
14.0to >12.0PtsCredit 69-60Mostly accurate demographics. Mostly appropriate inclusion of specific palliative care considerations related to the demographic group chosen. . Mostly accurate links between concepts. Mostly accurate & relevant relationships between concepts. |
12.0to >9.0PtsPass 59-50Some inaccurate or missing demographics. Inclusion of inclusion of specific palliative care considerations related to the demographic group chosen, but not always clear. Some inaccurate or missing links between concepts. Some inaccurate or missing description of relationships between concepts. |
9.0to >0PtsFail >50Inaccurate or no representation of demographics. Inaccurate or no of inclusion of specific palliative care considerations related to the demographic group chosen. Inaccurate or no links between concepts. Poor or irrelevant description of relationships between concepts. |
|
20.0pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeInterventions for client and family (20 marks)Interventions may include symptom management or complimentary therapies. Connection between concepts and group with relevant explanation |
20.0to >15.0PtsHigh Distinction 100-80Clear and comprehensive connections between concept to concept and concepts to chosen group. Includes comprehensive and relevant explanation related to interventions for client and family. |
15.0to >14.0PtsDistinction 79-70Clear connections between concept to concept and concepts to chosen group. Includes clear and relevant explanation related to interventions for client and family. |
14.0to >12.0PtsCredit 69-60Brief connections between concept to concept and concepts to chosen group. Brief explanation related to interventions for client and family. |
12.0to >9.0PtsPass 59-50Limited connections between concept to concept and concepts to chosen group. Limited explanation related to interventions for client and family. |
9.0to >0PtsFail >50Unclear or no connections between concept to concept and concepts to chosen group. Unclear or no explanation related to interventions for client and family. |
|
20.0pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeSupport services for the client and familyIdentify the support services for the client and family. These may include palliative care nurses visits; psychological counselling. Connections between the group with relevant explanation |
20.0to >15.0PtsHigh Distinction 100-80Clear and comprehensive connections between concept to concept and concepts to chosen group. Includes comprehensive and relevant explanation related to support services for client and family. |
15.0to >14.0PtsDistinctionconnections between concept to concept and concepts to chosen group. Includes clear and relevant explanation related to support services for client and family. |
14.0to >12.0PtsCreditBrief connections between concept to concept and concepts to chosen group. Brief explanation related to support services for client and family |
12.0to >9.0PtsPassLimited connections between concept to concept and concepts to chosen group. Limited explanation related to support services for client and family. |
9.0to >0PtsFail >50Unclear or no connections between concept to concept and concepts to chosen group. Unclear or no explanation related to support services for client and family. |
|
20.0pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeWritten summary (20 marks)Description of your group and map. Explanation of organisation and representation in your map. Explanation of nursing interventions. |
20.0to >15.0PtsHigh Distinction 100-80A polished and succinct description of map & group. Clearly able to follow explanation and organisation of the mind map. Comprehensive explanation of nursing interventions. |
15.0to >14.0PtsDistinction 79-70Carefully described map & group. Clear organisation of the map. Clear explanation of nursing interventions. |
14.0to >12.0PtsCredit 69-60Mostly well-described map & group. A clear representation of the map. Minimal unclear explanations. Nursing interventions explained. |
12.0to >9.0PtsPass 59-50Shows some attempt to describe the map & group and relate to the organisation on the map. In places difficult to see the connection with the map. Brief explanation of nursing interventions. |
9.0to >0PtsFail >50Poor description of map and group. No or unclear explanation of mind map organisation and nursing interventions. |
|
20.0pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeReferencing (5 marks)Follows APA style (7th ed.). Use of broad range of literature. References no earlier than 2010 to ensure up to date. |
5.0to >3.0PtsHigh Distinction 100-80Wide range (5) and high-quality sources which have been accurately included in accordance with APA style (7th ed.) No errors in reference list. |
3.0PtsCredit 69-60Adequate number of sources (5) relevant to the subject; does not go beyond the core literature outlined in the unit. Mostly adheres to APA style (7th ed.) with repeated errors in a reference list. |
3.0to >2.0PtsNo descriptionMinimal use of literature sources ( |
2.0to >0PtsFail >50Either no evidence of literature being consulted or use of an irrelevant, old or very small number of sources. Omission or major errors in a reference list. |
|
5.0pts
|
Total points:100.0 |