A 69-year-old male of Australian background with a history of hypertension and is a current smoker (30 years), diagnosed with aortic stenosis.
You will choose ONE of the provided scenarios below and create an online educational resource package (a website) using the program Microsoft Sway (located in Office 365 suite). Your target audience are registered nurses (graduates) or enrolled nurses who need an education resource to help plan the care for their patients. scenario A 69-year-old male of Australian background with a history of hypertension and is a current smoker (30 years), diagnosed with aortic stenosis. The website must include the following sections: 1. Justification and epidemiology: • Identify the chosen disease. What is your rationale for choosing this disease? Provide an overview of epidemiological data for the chosen disease within the Australian context. 2. Pathophysiology and pharmacology (video): • You are required to create and upload to the website a short video (6-7 minutes maximum length) of yourself “teaching” your target audience about the disease pathophysiology and related pharmacology. • This video needs to include: i. A comprehensive discussion of the pathophysiology of the chosen disease ii. Identifications of one (1) drug commonly used to manage the chosen disease. You need to identify the drug class, and describe the mechanism of action, indications and relevant considerations for the chosen drug, with reference to the patient. This needs to be linked back to the pathophysiological changes of the disease. 3. Impact of chronic disease: • Identify and discuss the impact of the chosen chronic disease on the patient. 4. Long-term management and health promotion strategies: • Identify long-term management strategies to promote health and independence for the patient with the chosen chronic disease. These should be linked to the identified factors impacting the patient in the previous section. 5. Nursing care plan for an acute exacerbation (infographic): • You are required to develop a nursing care plan that identifies two (2) acute issues, goals and interventions to manage the issues. • This is to be completed using the provided infographic template on LEO 6. 6.Justification of nursing care: • You will provide your discussion and justification for the identified issues and interventions outlined in your nursing care plan. 7. References . You will submit 2 parts: 1. The URL link for your website 2. The exported Word document which provides a time stamp of when you finished your website and submitted your work. If a student is found to have edited their website and work after the submission date, their website will be compared to the uploaded Word version and marks will be deducted dependent on the significance of the changes, which may result in an allocation of 0 marks. FORMATTING File format The assessment will be completed using the program Microsoft Sway. You will also use the infographic template for your nursing care plan. There is no need to include an introduction or conclusion. Each answer must be cited and supported by a wide range of relevant and credible resources were indicated in the marking rubric. REFRENCING Referencing Style APA 7th edition Minimum References, A minimum of 15 high quality resources are to be used. All arguments must be supported using a variety of high-quality primary evidence. Avoid using any one source repetitively. Age of References Published in the last 5 years unless using seminal text. Alphabetical Order References are arranged alphabetically by author family name Hanging Indent Second and subsequent lines of a reference have a hanging indent DOI Presented as functional hyperlink Spacing Double spacing the entire reference list, both within and between entries. Unit Outline Page 16 of 17… Extended Unit Outline – NRSG265_FINAL MODERATED_202360 © Australian Catholic University 2023 APPENDIX 1 – ASSESSMENT 1 PROJECT Criterion (weighting) HD (85-100%) DI (75-84%) CR (65-74%) PA (50-64%) NN (<50%) no="" attempt="" resource:="" general="" layout,="" mechanics="" 20%="" the="" education="" resource="" is="" easy="" to="" navigate="" and="" clearly="" presents="" the="" required="" components.="" diagrams,="" images="" and="" text="" are="" relevant="" and="" have="" a="" highly="" effective="" level="" of="" engagement="" and="" visual="" appeal="" throughout.="" information="" is="" targeted="" at="" the="" right="" audience.="" there="" are="" no="" errors="" with="" grammar,="" spelling="" and="" punctuation="" and="" the="" meaning="" is="" very="" clear.="" the="" education="" resource="" is="" easy="" to="" navigate="" and="" presents="" the="" required="" components.="" diagrams,="" images="" and="" text="" are="" relevant="" and="" have="" a="" strong="" level="" of="" engagement="" and="" visual="" appeal="" throughout.="" information="" is="" targeted="" at="" the="" right="" audience.="" there="" are="" no="" errors="" with="" grammar,="" spelling="" and="" punctuation="" and="" the="" meaning="" is="" clear.="" the="" education="" resource="" presents="" the="" required="" components="" in="" a="" mostly="" logical="" way.="" diagrams,="" images="" and="" text="" are="" relevant="" and="" have="" a="" satisfactory="" level="" of="" engagement="" and="" visual="" appeal="" throughout.="" information="" is="" targeted="" at="" the="" right="" audience.="" there="" are="" some="" errors="" with="" grammar,="" spelling="" and="" punctuation.="" however,="" the="" meaning="" is="" clear.="" the="" education="" resource="" presents="" the="" required="" components.="" diagrams,="" images="" and="" text="" are="" relevant="" and="" have="" a="" basic="" level="" of="" engagement="" and="" visual="" appeal="" throughout.="" information="" is="" targeted="" at="" the="" right="" audience.="" there="" are="" several="" errors="" with="" grammar,="" spelling="" and="" punctuation.="" the="" errors="" detract="" somewhat="" from="" the="" meaning.="" the="" education="" resource="" is="" poorly="" organised="" and="" difficult="" to="" navigate,="" and="" does="" not="" present="" all="" of="" the="" required="" components.="" diagrams,="" images="" and="" text="" are="" not="" relevant,="" and="" are="" not="" visually="" engaging.="" information="" is="" not="" targeted="" at="" the="" right="" audience.="" there="" are="" substantial="" errors="" with="" grammar,="" spelling="" and="" punctuation.="" the="" errors="" detract="" significantly="" from="" the="" meaning.="" the="" education="" resource="" is="" presented="" in="" a="" haphazard="" manner="" and="" is="" missing="" many="" of="" the="" required="" components.="" no="" engagement="" and/or="" relevance.="" information="" is="" not="" targeted="" at="" the="" right="" audience.="" substantial="" errors="" in="" grammar,="" spelling="" and="" punctuation="" are="" such="" that="" the="" content="" does="" not="" make="" sense="" justification="" of="" chosen="" disease="" and="" epidemiology="" in="" australian="" context="" 5%="" provides="" comprehensive="" justification="" and="" discussion="" for="" the="" chosen="" disease.="" discussion="" is="" supported="" by="" a="" wide="" range="" of="" relevant="" and="" credible="" sources.="" provides="" thorough="" justification="" and="" discussion="" for="" the="" chosen="" disease.="" discussion="" is="" supported="" by="" a="" wide="" range="" of="" relevant="" and="" credible="" sources.="" provides="" sound="" justification="" and="" discussion="" for="" the="" chosen="" disease.="" discussion="" is="" supported="" by="" mostly="" credible="" sources.="" provides="" basic="" justification="" and="" discussion="" for="" the="" chosen="" disease.="" discussion="" is="" supported="" by="" some="" credible="" sources.="" provides="" inappropriate="" or="" inaccurate="" justification="" and="" discussion="" for="" the="" chosen="" disease.="" discussion="" is="" not="" supported="" by="" credible="" sources.="" no="" appropriate="" justification="" and="" discussion="" for="" the="" chosen="" disease.="" discussion="" is="" not="" supported="" by="" any="" credible="" sources.="" pathophysiology="" (video)="" 15%="" a="" comprehensive="" and="" in="" depth="" understanding="" of="" the="" pathophysiology="" is="" evident.="" discussion="" is="" supported="" by="" a="" wide="" range="" of="" relevant="" and="" credible="" sources.="" a="" thorough="" and="" in="" depth="" understanding="" of="" the="" pathophysiology="" is="" evident.="" discussion="" is="" supported="" by="" a="" wide="" range="" of="" relevant="" and="" credible="" sources.="" a="" sound="" understanding="" with="" adequate="" depth="" of="" the="" pathophysiology="" is="" evident.="" discussion="" is="" supported="" by="" mostly="" credible="" sources.="" a="" basic="" understanding="" of="" the="" pathophysiology="" is="" evident.="" sufficient="" depth="" is="" provided.="" discussion="" is="" supported="" by="" some="" credible="" sources.="" a="" minimal="" understanding="" of="" the="" pathophysiology="" is="" evident.="" insufficient="" depth="" is="" provided.="" discussion="" is="" not="" supported="" by="" credible="" sources.="" no="" understanding="" of="" the="" pathophysiology="" is="" evident="" and="" not="" supported="" by="" any="" credible="" sources.="" discussion="" is="" not="" supported="" by="" any="" credible="" sources.="" pharmacology="" (video)="" 5%="" one="" (1)="" class="" of="" drug="" appropriately="" identified="" and="" taught="" to="" the="" audience.="" a="" comprehensive="" understanding="" and="" explanation="" of="" drug="" action,="" indication="" and="" relevant="" nursing="" considerations="" is="" evident.="" discussion="" is="" supported="" by="" a="" wide="" range="" of="" relevant="" and="" credible="" sources.="" one="" (1)="" class="" of="" drug="" appropriately="" identified="" and="" taught="" to="" the="" audience.="" a="" thorough="" understanding="" and="" explanation="" of="" drug="" action,="" indication="" and="" relevant="" nursing="" considerations="" is="" evident.="" discussion="" is="" supported="" by="" a="" range="" of="" relevant="" and="" credible="" sources.="" one="" (1)="" class="" of="" drug="" appropriately="" identified="" and="" taught="" to="" the="" audience.="" a="" sound="" understanding="" and="" explanation="" of="" drug="" action,="" indication="" and="" relevant="" nursing="" considerations="" is="" evident.="" discussion="" is="" supported="" by="" mostly="" credible="" sources.="" one="" (1)="" class="" of="" drug="" appropriately="" identified="" and="" taught="" to="" the="" audience.="" a="" basic="" understanding="" and="" explanation="" of="" drug="" action,="" indication="" and="" relevant="" nursing="" considerations="" is="" evident.="" discussion="" is="" supported="" by="" some="" credible="" sources.="" less="" than="" one="" (1)="" class="" of="" drug="" appropriately="" identified="" and="" taught="" to="" the="" audience.="" minimal="" understanding="" and="" explanation="" of="" drug="" action,="" indication="" and="" relevant="" nursing="" considerations="" is="" evident.="" discussion="" is="" not="" supported="" by="" credible="" sources.="" no="" appropriate="" identification="" of="" one="" (1)="" class="" of="" drug.="" no="" understanding="" and="" explanation="" of="" drug="" action,="" indication="" and="" relevant="" nursing="" considerations="" is="" evident.="" discussion="" is="" not="" supported="" by="" any="" credible="" sources.="" powerpoint="" presentation="" interventions="" for="" issue="" 1="" (list)="" acute="" issue="" 1="" (use="" format:="" issue,="" cause,="" evidence)="" goal="" for="" issue="" 1="" (use="" smart="" format)="" acute="" issue="" 2="" (use="" format:="" issue,="" cause,="" evidence)="" goal="" for="" issue="" 2="" (use="" smart="" format)="" interventions="" for="" issue="" 2="" (list)="" unit="" outline="" page="" 16="" of="" 17…="" extended="" unit="" outline="" –="" nrsg265_final="" moderated_202360="" ©="" australian="" catholic="" university="" 2023="" appendix="" 1="" –="" assessment="" 1="" project="" criterion="" (weighting)="" hd="" (85-100%)="" di="" (75-84%)="" cr="" (65-74%)="" pa="" (50-64%)="" nn="">50%)><50%) no attempt resource: general layout, mechanics 20% the education resource is easy to navigate and clearly presents the required components. diagrams, images and text are relevant and have a highly effective level of engagement and visual appeal throughout. information is targeted at the right audience. there are no errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation and the meaning is very clear. the education resource is easy to navigate and presents the required components. diagrams, images and text are relevant and have a strong level of engagement and visual appeal throughout. information is targeted at the right audience. there are no errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation and the meaning is clear. the education resource presents the required components in a mostly logical way. diagrams, images and text are relevant and have a satisfactory level of engagement and visual appeal throughout. information is targeted at the right audience. there are some errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation. however, the meaning is clear. the education resource presents the required components. diagrams, images and text are relevant and have a basic level of engagement and visual appeal throughout. information is targeted at the right audience. there are several errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation. the errors detract somewhat from the meaning. the education resource is poorly organised and difficult to navigate, and does not present all of the required components. diagrams, images and text are not relevant, and are not visually engaging. information is not targeted at the right audience. there are substantial errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation. the errors detract significantly from the meaning. the education resource is presented in a haphazard manner and is missing many of the required components. no engagement and/or relevance. information is not targeted at the right audience. substantial errors in grammar, spelling and punctuation are such that the content does not make sense justification of chosen disease and epidemiology in australian context 5% provides comprehensive justification and discussion for the chosen disease. discussion is supported by a wide range of relevant and credible sources. provides thorough justification and discussion for the chosen disease. discussion is supported by a wide range of relevant and credible sources. provides sound justification and discussion for the chosen disease. discussion is supported by mostly credible sources. provides basic justification and discussion for the no="" attempt="" resource:="" general="" layout,="" mechanics="" 20%="" the="" education="" resource="" is="" easy="" to="" navigate="" and="" clearly="" presents="" the="" required="" components.="" diagrams,="" images="" and="" text="" are="" relevant="" and="" have="" a="" highly="" effective="" level="" of="" engagement="" and="" visual="" appeal="" throughout.="" information="" is="" targeted="" at="" the="" right="" audience.="" there="" are="" no="" errors="" with="" grammar,="" spelling="" and="" punctuation="" and="" the="" meaning="" is="" very="" clear.="" the="" education="" resource="" is="" easy="" to="" navigate="" and="" presents="" the="" required="" components.="" diagrams,="" images="" and="" text="" are="" relevant="" and="" have="" a="" strong="" level="" of="" engagement="" and="" visual="" appeal="" throughout.="" information="" is="" targeted="" at="" the="" right="" audience.="" there="" are="" no="" errors="" with="" grammar,="" spelling="" and="" punctuation="" and="" the="" meaning="" is="" clear.="" the="" education="" resource="" presents="" the="" required="" components="" in="" a="" mostly="" logical="" way.="" diagrams,="" images="" and="" text="" are="" relevant="" and="" have="" a="" satisfactory="" level="" of="" engagement="" and="" visual="" appeal="" throughout.="" information="" is="" targeted="" at="" the="" right="" audience.="" there="" are="" some="" errors="" with="" grammar,="" spelling="" and="" punctuation.="" however,="" the="" meaning="" is="" clear.="" the="" education="" resource="" presents="" the="" required="" components.="" diagrams,="" images="" and="" text="" are="" relevant="" and="" have="" a="" basic="" level="" of="" engagement="" and="" visual="" appeal="" throughout.="" information="" is="" targeted="" at="" the="" right="" audience.="" there="" are="" several="" errors="" with="" grammar,="" spelling="" and="" punctuation.="" the="" errors="" detract="" somewhat="" from="" the="" meaning.="" the="" education="" resource="" is="" poorly="" organised="" and="" difficult="" to="" navigate,="" and="" does="" not="" present="" all="" of="" the="" required="" components.="" diagrams,="" images="" and="" text="" are="" not="" relevant,="" and="" are="" not="" visually="" engaging.="" information="" is="" not="" targeted="" at="" the="" right="" audience.="" there="" are="" substantial="" errors="" with="" grammar,="" spelling="" and="" punctuation.="" the="" errors="" detract="" significantly="" from="" the="" meaning.="" the="" education="" resource="" is="" presented="" in="" a="" haphazard="" manner="" and="" is="" missing="" many="" of="" the="" required="" components.="" no="" engagement="" and/or="" relevance.="" information="" is="" not="" targeted="" at="" the="" right="" audience.="" substantial="" errors="" in="" grammar,="" spelling="" and="" punctuation="" are="" such="" that="" the="" content="" does="" not="" make="" sense="" justification="" of="" chosen="" disease="" and="" epidemiology="" in="" australian="" context="" 5%="" provides="" comprehensive="" justification="" and="" discussion="" for="" the="" chosen="" disease.="" discussion="" is="" supported="" by="" a="" wide="" range="" of="" relevant="" and="" credible="" sources.="" provides="" thorough="" justification="" and="" discussion="" for="" the="" chosen="" disease.="" discussion="" is="" supported="" by="" a="" wide="" range="" of="" relevant="" and="" credible="" sources.="" provides="" sound="" justification="" and="" discussion="" for="" the="" chosen="" disease.="" discussion="" is="" supported="" by="" mostly="" credible="" sources.="" provides="" basic="" justification="" and="" discussion="" for="">50%) no attempt resource: general layout, mechanics 20% the education resource is easy to navigate and clearly presents the required components. diagrams, images and text are relevant and have a highly effective level of engagement and visual appeal throughout. information is targeted at the right audience. there are no errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation and the meaning is very clear. the education resource is easy to navigate and presents the required components. diagrams, images and text are relevant and have a strong level of engagement and visual appeal throughout. information is targeted at the right audience. there are no errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation and the meaning is clear. the education resource presents the required components in a mostly logical way. diagrams, images and text are relevant and have a satisfactory level of engagement and visual appeal throughout. information is targeted at the right audience. there are some errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation. however, the meaning is clear. the education resource presents the required components. diagrams, images and text are relevant and have a basic level of engagement and visual appeal throughout. information is targeted at the right audience. there are several errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation. the errors detract somewhat from the meaning. the education resource is poorly organised and difficult to navigate, and does not present all of the required components. diagrams, images and text are not relevant, and are not visually engaging. information is not targeted at the right audience. there are substantial errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation. the errors detract significantly from the meaning. the education resource is presented in a haphazard manner and is missing many of the required components. no engagement and/or relevance. information is not targeted at the right audience. substantial errors in grammar, spelling and punctuation are such that the content does not make sense justification of chosen disease and epidemiology in australian context 5% provides comprehensive justification and discussion for the chosen disease. discussion is supported by a wide range of relevant and credible sources. provides thorough justification and discussion for the chosen disease. discussion is supported by a wide range of relevant and credible sources. provides sound justification and discussion for the chosen disease. discussion is supported by mostly credible sources. provides basic justification and discussion for the>