4. Unethical Conduct in Marketing For a study of unethical conduct, a sample of 100 marketing graduates was requested to bribe a customer, and ecach subject's intention to comply with the request was...

show work

Extracted text: 4. Unethical Conduct in Marketing For a study of unethical conduct, a sample of 100 marketing graduates was requested to bribe a customer, and ecach subject's intention to comply with the request was measured.[Scores ranged from -1.5 (intention to resist the request) to 2.5 (intention to comply with the request).] Summary statistics on the 100 scores show F = 2.31 and s = 3.14. One researcher, Dr. Samuel, has the opinion that the mean intention score will DIFFER from 2. Do the data support this belief? Carry out a hypothesis test of Dr. Samuel's opinion, such that there is a 5% chance of having a Type I Error. (Complete Parts (a), (b), and (c).) (a) The value of the test statistic 2 (rounded to three decimal places) is (i) 0.987 (ii) 2.310 (iii) 0.099 (iv) 7.356 (b) The p-value (rounded to four decimal places) is (i) 0.1618 (ii) 0.3236 (iii) 0.0208 (iv) 0 You should find on of the following useful for Part (b): P(2 > 0.987) = 0.1618 P(z > 2.310) = 0.0104 P(2 > 0.099) = 0.4606 P(2 > 7.356) - 0 (c) The proper conclusion of the hypothesis test is that (i) There is evidence to support Dr. Samuel's opinion, because p> a (ii) There is evidence to support Dr. Samuel's opinion, because p< a="" (iii)="" there="" is="" no="" evidence="" to="" support="" dr.="" samuel's="" opinion,="" because="" p=""> a (iv) There is no evidence to support Dr. Samuel's opinion, because p< a>