3.6 marks
(range 0-7.3)
Conflicting and/or absence of important conventions particular to the blogging task, including organisation, presentation, spelling and grammar, use of images and other stylistic choices to engage the audience. 9.8 marks
(range 7.4-12.3)
Inconsistently uses important conventions particular to the blogging task, including organisation, presentation, spelling and grammar, use of images and other stylistic choices to engage the audience. 13.6 marks
(range 12.4-14.8)
Satisfactorily uses a range of important conventions particular to the blogging task, including organisation, presentation, spelling and grammar, use of images and other stylistic choices to engage the audience. 16.1 marks
(range 14.9-17.3)
Expertly uses a range of important conventions particular to the blogging task, including organisation, presentation, spelling and grammar, use of images and other stylistic choices to engage the audience.
18.6 marks
(range 17.4-19.8)
Consistently demonstrates detailed attention to and expert execution of a wide range of conventions particular to the blogging task, including organisation, presentation, spelling and grammar, use of images and other stylistic choices to engage the audience. 22.5 marks
(range 19.9-25)
Consistently and intelligently demonstrates detailed attention to and expert execution of a wide range of conventions particular to the blogging task, including organisation, presentation, spelling and grammar, use of images and other stylistic choices to engage the audience.
3.6 marks
(range 0-7.3)
Always uses inappropriate and/or irrelevant content to develop and explore basic ideas and presents an unacceptable exposition of complex knowledge and ideas. 9.8 marks
(range 7.4-12.3)
Mostly uses inappropriate and/or irrelevant content to develop and explore basic ideas and presents an unclear and incoherent exposition of complex knowledge and ideas. 13.6 marks
(range 12.4-14.8)
Moderately uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to illustrate mastery of the topic and presents a clear, coherent, independent and professional exposition of complex knowledge and ideas 16.1 marks
(range 14.9-17.3)
Mostly uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to illustrate mastery of the topic and presents a clear, coherent, independent and professional exposition of complex knowledge and ideas 18.6 marks
(range 17.4-19.8)
Consistently uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to illustrate a mastery of the topic, and generate original knowledge and understanding, making a substantial contribution to a discipline or area of professional practice. 22.5 marks
(range 19.9-25)
Consistently and effectively uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to illustrate a mastery of the topic and generates original knowledge and understanding, making a very substantial contribution to a discipline or area of professional practice.
Unacceptable Poor Satisfactory Good Very Good Exemplary
3.6 marks
(range 0-7.3)
Always fails to apply relevant theory. Unable to demonstrate mastery of theoretical knowledge. 9.8 marks
(range 7.4-12.3)
Often does not apply relevant theory. Limited ability to demonstrate mastery of theoretical knowledge. 13.6 marks
(range 12.4-14.8)
Satisfactorily applies relevant theory. Demonstrates a mastery of theoretical knowledge.
16.1 marks
(range 14.9-17.3)
Application of relevant theory is well done. Demonstrates a mastery of theoretical knowledge.
18.6 marks
(range 17.4-19.8)
Very good application of relevant theory. Demonstrates a high level of mastery of theoretical knowledge. 22.5 marks
(range 19.9-25)
Excellent application of relevant theory. Demonstrates an exceedingly high level of mastery of theoretical knowledge.
3.6 marks
(range 0-7.3)
Always presents information from inappropriate sources representing very limited points of view or approaches. Does not synthesise information and/or demonstrate an advanced and integrated understanding in any area. 9.8 marks
(range 7.4-12.3)
Often presents information from inappropriate sources representing limited points of view or approaches. Does not synthesise information and/or demonstrate an advanced and integrated understanding in any area. 13.6 marks
(range 12.4-14.8)
Presents information from relevant sources representing various points of view or approaches, and consolidates and synthesises information. 16.1 marks
(range 14.9-17.3)
Presents information from relevant sources representing various points of view or approaches, and does a good job of consolidating and synthesising information. 18.6 marks
(range 17.4-19.8)
Synthesises information and knowledge from a range of relevant sources representing various points of view, approaches, and does a very good job of consolidating and synthesising information. 22.5 marks
(range 19.9-25)
Synthesise complex information and knowledge from a broad range of relevant sources representing various points of view, approaches or cultural contexts, and does an outstanding job of consolidating and synthesising information.