1000 words for each question
Question 1
(a) Governing organisations involved in delivering public services is closely associated with public accountability. This accountability applies to matters of service delivery (e.g. quality and cost of services). However, it goes further than that: it includes the social, economic and political impacts of an organisation’s policies on the community and on the society-at-large. Required Using examples from your learning explain the reasoning behind the above statement, bringing out ways in which governance structures and processes incorporate public accountability mechanisms.
(b) Often, the way government bodies relate to one another as part of the system of government is that some make policies and others deliver services in accordance with those policies; in other words, policymaking and operations to deliver services are separated. Required In the context of relations between the policy maker and the service provider, discuss how control may be exercised through a mix of quantitative and qualitative information. Give examples.
Question 2
(a)
Using examples from your learning, explain the following notions and how they are related to each other:
· short-term cost cutting arises from increasing managerial autonomy and by establishing annual salary bonuses and similar incentives for managers to achieve desirable aggregated annual results
· the autonomy and incentives just referred to can endanger public services being sustained in the long term, particularly because managers might allow the capacity of an organisation for providing services to deteriorate.
(b) Lay governors and general managers of governmental organisations rely on administrative and other specialist professionals (e.g., accountants, human resource experts, teachers, doctors, social workers) in various ways, and on systems (e.g. accounting systems, human resource systems, student management systems, patient and client records systems) developed, operated and maintained by them. Required Discuss the implications of this reliance in terms of relationships founded on professional technology, information and expert knowledge being unbalanced. Give examples.
Question 3
(a) Using examples from your learning during course, explain how matters of
public engagement and responding to public opinion are implicated in the way a board,
commission or council governs a public body.
(b) Provider organisations are organisations which provide a public service to the public;
examples are schools, health boards, and charities or voluntary bodies.
Funding organisations are organisations which fund the provider organisations, although
some may also provide services to the public; examples are ministries (e.g., Department of
Social Welfare), territorial authorities (e.g., Canterbury Regional Council) and funding
agencies (e.g. the Tertiary Education Commission, New Zealand Lottery Grants Board).
Required
In respect to the relationships between provider organisations and funding organisations,
discuss the notion that financial numbers are a matter of measurement and, over and above
that, matters of communication, steering, answerability and sanction or reward
Question 4
(a) The governing body of an organisation involved in public service delivery (e.g. a
university council, health board, territorial authority council) will often try to steer units
of the organisation operating at the level of a community, a neighbourhood or a facility
(e.g., a school’s classrooms, a hospital’s operating theatres, a leisure centre), that is at the
so, called street level.
Required
explain how and why a combination of (1) standards, (2) funding provisions, (3) inspections of activities, and (4) measurements of outputs is often used as a steering mechanism, rather than only one of these four being used alone.
(b) Processes and results of public service providers, be they public or private, are made more
visible (or less visible) according to what is reported (or not reported). In turn, this affects
how these organisations perform, and can lead managers and governors of such
organisations to change their behaviour.
Required
Discuss this argument, bringing in such concepts as transparency and secrecy, and
accountability and unchecked autonomy.
Question 5
(a) In performing work for public bodies, administrative professionals (e.g., managers,
information systems experts, financial managers, auditors, economists, lawyers)
sometimes find themselves in the following two activities:
• Dealing with people from diverse political backgrounds
• Making presentations to public audiences
In the two roles or circumstances, these administrative professionals are called on to
apply various so-called generic skills and/or attributes. For a list of examples of generic
skills and/or attributes, see Jones (2010, p. 11).
Required
i. Using examples, describe a single generic skill or attribute which applies in both
activities listed in the two bullet points above. Your examples may be drawn from
any of the subjects and contexts you have studied at university or, indeed, have
experienced in employment or intern situations.
ii. Explain how the skill or attribute applies to each bullet point, and why it is
important to each bullet point. Bring out similarities and differences in the two
applications.
(b) Management of public services in many countries is carried out in the context of
democracy.
Required
Discuss how openness, communication and other means of transparency on the part of the
management team of a public services provider improve political accountability in this
context.
Question 6
(a) Using examples from your learning, explain how practical
difficulties (e.g., timing, information availability, interest of members of the public,
knowledge of members of the public) arise for governors and managers involved in
promoting community engagement in development planning (e.g., for the long-term
future of an entire territory) and related decisions about public body investment and
spending.
(b) Discuss how managing of public bodies goes some way beyond performance
measurement and business calculations, with consequences which are social, political and
cultural, as well as economic. Give examples.
Question 7
(a) Funding, performance and accountability are concerns for both governors and managers
of organisations involved in delivering public services, particularly in dealing with
external parties, such as funding bodies, service recipients and the public.
Required
Using examples from your learning explain how these
concerns are interrelated in how governors and managers perform their duties.
(b) The term diversity and inclusion are sometimes used to describe a public service
organisation’s approach to the people it employs or otherwise involves in carrying out its
activities, and to the people to whom it provides services or who otherwise benefit from
the activities.
Required
Discuss the political and managerial pros and cons of a public service organisation being
proactive culturally in applying this approach. Give examples.
Question 8
(a) Governments raise taxes and incur expenditure; this is true for local government (e.g.,
Christchurch City Council) as well as for governments at a national level (e.g., the
Government of New Zealand). Principles of representative democracy are a major
constitutional foundation affecting the way both local and national-level governments
account for taxation and expenditure.
Required
Using examples explain how these principles, and the budgeting entailed in them, are encompassed in the governing of public bodies, including in the way financial responsibility is delegated within such bodies.
(b) Compare and contrast the respective places of the following in how the public are assured
about the reliability of public services and the organisations which provide them:
i. public meetings an organisation convenes
ii. external expert evaluation, inspection, audit and accreditation of the organisation
iii. information the organisation publishes, including on its web pages, social media
sites, and in plans and reports.
Question 9
(a) In a parliamentary constitutional monarchy and similar democracies, it is widely accepted
that public service organisations are accountable to the public.
Required
Using examples from your learning course, explain the role of
radio, television, print, internet sites and social media in the complex nature of this
accountability relationship, and the implications for people in governing and managerial
roles.
(b) Regarding a public service organisation, accountability between staff with managerial
responsibility and the organisation’s governing body can take various forms.
Required
Discuss the notion that budgeting, including budget setting and budgetary control, is the
primary form which this accountability takes. Give examples.
Part of your discussion should contrast budgeting with other forms of this accountability
between managers and governing bodies.
Question 10
(a) Matters figuring in the managing of bodies involved in delivering public services include
efficiency and effectiveness, avoiding wastefulness, and financial caution and foresight.
Required
Using examples from your learning during the course, clarify the significance
of the matters referred to above, including their practical relevance to how things are done
in managing and performing service delivery.
(b) Those with an interest in the activities, performance and consequences of a public service
body (e.g., a hospital, a school, a city council) are likely to have varying expectations
about how the body in question should perform financially.
Required
Discuss how these varying expectations add to the complexity of governing such a body.
In your discussion, you may wish to refer to such types of people as:
• electors (or voters)
• payers of direct and indirect taxes
• professionals involved in service delivery (e.g. civil defence personnel, medical
staff, university lecturers, police officers, engineers)
• recipients or beneficiaries of services, and
• owners, members and employees of private organisations with particular concerns
about the functions and roles of the body.
Question 11
(a) In performing work for public bodies, administrative professionals (e.g., strategic
planners, marketers, accountants, human resource experts) sometimes find themselves in
the following two activities:
• Conferring among people with diverse professional or expertise backgrounds
• Coordinating the managerial tasks which service department heads perform in
planning and budgeting processes
In these two roles or circumstances, administrative professionals are called on to apply
various so-called generic skills and/or attributes. For a list of examples of generic skills
and/or attributes, see Jones (2010, p. 11).
Required
iii. Using examples, describe a single generic skill or attribute which applies in both
activities listed in the two bullet points above. Your examples may be drawn from
any of the subjects and contexts you have studied at university or, indeed, have
experienced in employment or intern situations.
iv. Explain how the skill or attribute applies to each bullet point, and why it is
important to each bullet point. Bring out similarities and differences in the two
applications.
(b) When used in governmental contexts, control systems are a source of political influence,
as well as administrative influence.
Required
Discuss the accuracy of the above statement, and outline the practical implications for
chief executives of public bodies.
Question 12
(a) Using examples, explain how the roles of governors can be differentiated from the roles of managers in matters of the policies, procedures and activities associated with administration and control.
(b) Many organisations involved in delivering public services are characterised by beliefs,
values and missions, which are usually published. Often in these, considerations of a
political, social and macroeconomic nature seem ascendant. Moreover, when these
organisations make plans and analyse future capital projects, such considerations may
take precedence over considerations of efficiency and related microeconomic notions.
Required
Discuss how and why political, social and macroeconomic considerations can be justified
as being ascendant in relation to public services, and the implications for projects which
public service organisations undertake. Give examples.
Question 13
(a), explain such reasons as market failure, allocative efficiency, distributive justice, social insurance and strategic significance for various services and goods being provided primarily by public bodies,
rather than private ones.
(b) Professional organisation is a name applied to a type of organisation dominated by
particular professionals (e.g. educators, researchers, clinicians, engineers, accountants,
lawyers, soldiers, social workers, police officers). Professional organisations include
public bodies involved in delivering certain public services (e.g. universities, hospitals,
transportation infrastructure, defence, social services, policing).
Required
Contrast the following two notions, bringing in such concepts as trust, expertise, apathy,
accountability and corruption:
• That performance measurement and reporting can reduce the proficiency with which
particular public services are delivered by interfering with the work of the
professionals involved in their delivery, and
• That performance measurement and reporting can contend with the dangers of
particular public services being captured by the professionals who deliver them. That
is, it can prevent or deter the professionals in question from running the services
primarily for their benefit, instead of for the benefit of types of people who are
officially intended to benefit, according, for example, to legislation, charters,
regulations, statements of intent, missions and prospectuses.