1.0 - 0.8 0.6 F 0.4 0.25 0.5 0.75 1.0 Frequency of sitters in population FIGURE 6.22 Negative frequency- dependent selection. When re- sources are scarce for fruit fly larvae, the fitness of a...

When the frequency of sitters is 0.75 (see Figure 6.22), the fitness of rovers is much higher than that of the sitters. So why don’t rovers quickly and completely eliminate the sitters in this population?

Don't write from any online source..

1.0 -<br>0.8<br>0.6 F<br>0.4<br>0.25<br>0.5<br>0.75<br>1.0<br>Frequency of sitters<br>in population<br>FIGURE 6.22 Negative frequency-<br>dependent selection. When re-<br>sources are scarce for fruit fly larvae,<br>the fitness of a sedentary sitter (red<br>line) versus an active rover (blue line)<br>depends on which of the two types is<br>rarer. (After Fitzpatrick et al. 2007.)<br>Fitness<br>

Extracted text: 1.0 - 0.8 0.6 F 0.4 0.25 0.5 0.75 1.0 Frequency of sitters in population FIGURE 6.22 Negative frequency- dependent selection. When re- sources are scarce for fruit fly larvae, the fitness of a sedentary sitter (red line) versus an active rover (blue line) depends on which of the two types is rarer. (After Fitzpatrick et al. 2007.) Fitness

Jun 10, 2022

SOLUTION.PDF

1.0 - 0.8 0.6 F 0.4 0.25 0.5 0.75 1.0 Frequency of sitters in population FIGURE 6.22 Negative frequency- dependent selection. When re- sources are scarce for fruit fly larvae, the fitness of a...

Get Answer To This Question

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment