1. Why could the hospital in Barnett not argue that, on any view, the true cause of Mr Barnett’s death was the person who put the arsenic in the tea?
2. In his 2003 Report, Making Amends (see below), the CMO proposed a limited no fault scheme to deal with cases of neurologically impaired babies. As an independent research exercise investigate why (so far) this suggestion has not been acted upon
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here