1. What were the “harmonious and satisfactory” consequences that followed from accepting as true those rules that you just gave as examples to question 1 above?
2. According to the textbook the ethical relativist cannot claim that the moral standards of one’s own culture are mistaken nor that the moral standards of another culture are mistaken. Explain why the ethical relativist cannot make either of these claims. Do you agree with the argument of the textbook? Why?
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here