1. What did Justice Harlan mean when he said, in his concurring opinion in Katz v. United States, that the answer to the question of what protection the Fourth Amendment affords to people requires reference to a place?
2. Should a person in a telephone booth be given the same degree of Fourth Amendment protection as a person in his or her bedroom? As a person in his or her garage? As a person in his or her automobile?
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here