1. Suppose Churchland is right and it is a theory. Does the fact that it does not explain mental illness, creativity, intelligence, sleep, etc., show that it must be a “radically false” theory? Why?...

1. Suppose Churchland is right and it is a theory. Does the fact that it does not explain mental illness, creativity, intelligence, sleep, etc., show that it must be a “radically false” theory? Why?

2. How do you think that Descartes might answer Locke’s “Nestor” objection?